Categories
The Green Machine This great Nation & Its People War

Frozen Indecision: American Intervention In Siberian Russia 1918 by TOM LAEMLEIN

sib_lead_8-us-troops-outside-vladivostok.jpg

America’s interaction with Russia is quite the hot topic these days. Many Americans wonder, are the Russians friends or are they foes? In that light, little has changed from a century ago. In the summer of 1918, President Wilson committed American troops to Russia, and the country wasn’t sure what to make of it then either.


U.S. and allied troops on the march in Siberia.

The more time I spent researching the actions of the American Expeditionary Force Siberia, the more confusing their story became. The details, like names and places and dates, are relatively easy to come by. The big questions, like “why,” are much more difficult to answer. Apparently those questions were just as difficult to answer in 1918-1920.

The longer the intervention went on, the less that Uncle Sam’s frozen doughboys understood their mission. With the success of their deployment so poorly defined and their enemies growing in number by the hour, our troops were brought home. American intervention in Russia was quickly forgotten, and has rarely been discussed ever since.

When you think about it, the whole idea is rather shocking, then or now. American combat troops were stationed in tumultuous Russia, at that time a nation in the throes of a bloody civil war. While ostensibly protecting “Allied interests” in Siberia, one of the most inhospitable regions on the planet, U.S. troops traded shots with Bolshevik forces and occasionally with renegade Cossacks, all while trying to keep the peace among bitterly divided Russians and holding together a strange multi-national coalition of uncertain Allies. Small wonder that your high school history teacher never mentioned this in class. No worries, there will be no quiz at the end of this article either.

America Joins the Allies
As World War I wore on, Germany dreaded the prospect of America’s muscle bolstering the strength of the Allied nations. In April 1917, their fears were realized and the United States declared war on Germany. But America’s military would not be ready to make a difference on the battlefield for many months. In the meantime, Germany looked to break the stalemate in France before the arrival of American troops could tip the scales to the Allied side.

On Germany’s eastern front, the collapse of Czar Nicholas II’s Russian autocracy in October 1917 gave the Kaiser the break he had been looking for. The Russian front had kept 40 German divisions occupied in the east. The signing of the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk in March 1918 meant that the Russians were completely out of the war, allowing the Germans to fully concentrate on the western front. The German Army immediately launched a major offensive to bring their newfound divisions into action. England and France, dangerously short on men and resources, appealed to President Wilson to intervene in Russia to re-open the Easter Front and help relieve the growing pressure in Western Europe.


Browning M1917 MG position: U.S. troops pose with men of the Czechoslovakian Legion. It appears that the Czechs are armed with Japanese Arisaka rifles.

Allied intervention in Russia began with the best intentions, but with very little understanding of what was really going on inside that giant nation. The initial focus remained on defeating the Central Powers and ending World War I, thus the idea of reestablishing the eastern front and maintaining pressure on Germany and their Austro-Hungarian partners from both ends of Europe. There was also a significant amount of valuable military supplies kept in both Western Russia (Archangel) and in Far Eastern Russia (Vladivostok). Allied troops were deployed to secure them, and also to assist the Czechoslovak Legion, a large and effective group of troops that had been fighting alongside Russian forces for some time.

The Czechoslovak Legion had declared neutrality towards the communist Bolshevik forces, and thus had been granted safe passage home, albeit through Siberia. The 50,000-strong Czechoslovak Legion was taking the long way home, and they ultimately needed to be rescued from a country in the midst of a growing civil war.

Deployed to Russia


Lieutenant Colonel Nichols of the U.S. 31st Infantry Regiment, outside of Vladivostok.

In July 1918, President Wilson, despite the exhortations of his war advisors, agreed to send 5,000 U.S. Army troops, known as the “American North Russia Expeditionary Force” (also called the Polar Bear Expedition) to Archangel. Another group, numbering about 8,000, called the “American Expeditionary Force, Siberia”, would be sent to Vladivostok. American troops were soon on their way and going to war in Russia.


Christmas greetings from Siberia: U.S. War Stamps poster highlighting the American troop deployment to Russia in 1918.

U.S. troops would not be alone in Siberia. Allied intervention in far eastern Russia also included groups of a few thousand British, Canadian, French, Italian and Chinese troops. Then came the Japanese. Originally expected to deploy about 7,000 troops, the Japanese ultimately sent a force of 70,000 men to Siberia.

Japan’s strange commitment of such a large force for a “rescue mission” heightened mistrust of their ultimate intentions in the region. Major General William Sidney Graves, the U.S. commander in Siberia, kept a close eye on his Japanese allies. Even so, by November 1918 the Japanese had occupied the ports and major towns throughout the Russian Maritime Provinces and they also occupied all of Siberia east of the city of Chita. They would keep much of this territory for several years after the other Allied troops had been withdrawn.


Bolsheviks: Russian communists fighting against the White government of Siberia led by Admiral Kolchak.

As for the Russians in Siberia, there were an increasing number of Reds, the communist Bolsheviks. During the first few months of the intervention there were an equal number of White forces—anti-communist troops that were greatly strengthened by the combat-hardened Czech Legion. Unfortunately, the White Russians were frequently at odds with each other.

The recognized White Russian government was led by Admiral Alexander Kolchak, and the anti-communist Cossacks were led by Grigory Semyonov and Ivan Kalmykov. Both groups were generally brutal to anyone in their path, and the Cossacks were notably unpredictable in any situation. If politics makes strange bedfellows, then Siberia was an orgy of ideological confusion.


Hardened veterans of the Czech Legion armed with the Mosin-Nagant M1891 rifle. The surviving members of the Legion finally made it home in the summer of 1920.

President Wilson defined the objectives of U.S. policy in the Russian intervention within a short, and not particularly detailed, memo that Major General Graves adhered to for the most part. Wilson’s basic points were:

  • The primary objective is to win the war against Germany.
  • The U.S. will not interfere in Russian internal affairs.
  • Military action is admissible to help the Czechoslovakian Legion.
  • American troops will be employed to guard military stores.
  • The United States will not limit the actions or policies of its allies.
  • American forces will be withdrawn if and when necessary.


American Troops in Siberia


On guard at the U.S. consulate in Vladivostok. Note the locally sourced cold-weather gear.

As American troops began to arrive in Siberia in September 1918, it was already turning cold, and it was quickly apparent that the expedition was not properly equipped for the harsh climate. Antique cold-weather gear, even relics of the Indian Wars of the late 19th century, was issued to some of the men. Other warm clothing had to be procured locally until proper supplies from home could be obtained.


One of the many parades in Vladivostok. American troops march while Japanese troops stand in review.

Duty in Siberia was as tedious as it was cold. Pointless parades on the streets of Vladivostok, along with continuous drilling, became the order of the day. The unyielding cold wore the men down. Unrelenting boredom eroded morale. Uncertain of their allies, and restricted from fully engaging any enemies they encountered, the expedition foundered—but still they stayed.

Confusion and dissention about the intervention mission distracted U.S. officials. General Graves commented: “Representatives of the War Department and the State Department were carrying out entirely different policies at the same time in the same place. There can be no difference of opinion as to the accuracy of this statement, and the results were bitter criticism of all United States agents.”


Working on the railroad: Guarding the railways was of critical importance in Siberia.

General Graves stayed consistent in his interpretation and execution of President Wilson’s intervention policy memo. This meant that American troops in Siberia guarded the stocks of war supplies around Vladivostok and also protected the Trans-Siberian Railroad. As compared with their counterparts in Northern Russia, the troops in Siberia rarely fought with the Bolsheviks. However, when American troops did engage the communists in Siberia, the Reds paid a stiff price.


Czech Legion train, veteran of their Trans-Siberian rail trek. The graphic roughly translates to: “Better to fight and die than to live as a slave.”

So too did the Cossacks, when American troops’ sense of justice and human decency was stretched to the breaking point. Cossack groups refused to answer to any authority, and they ranged throughout Siberia, occasionally fighting the Bolsheviks, but most frequently they were engaged in raping and pillaging the locals. As time went on, the Cossacks played both sides, alternately fighting under Red banners or White, whichever served their purposes at the moment.


Czech Legion train: Armed and armored trains were a dominant force in Siberia.

During the early morning of January 10, 1920, the Bolshevik armored train “Destroyer,” under the command of Cossack General Ataman Semionoff, attacked a train station guarded by American troops. Fighting in temperatures that had fallen to 30 degrees below zero, the American platoon resisted fiercely, holding off forces superior in number and firepower. Their subsequent counterattack disabled the armored train and captured its crew. Two Americans died and one was wounded in this final combat action for American troops in the World War I era.


Cold weather duty: U.S. soldier with a M1903 rifle, standing guard in Vladivostok during late 1918.

All told, 48 American soldiers lost their lives during the intervention in Siberia. Many more were casualties of severe frostbite and a collection of diseases, ranging from virulent flu to a form of plague. Many men suffered from venereal disease. Keeping the soldiers warm, as well as entertained, apparently came at some great cost in Siberia.

The End of the Intervention
During the summer of 1919, Admiral Kolchak was captured by the Red Army and executed. With his death, the White Russian regime in Siberia disintegrated. During the next 10 months, most Allied forces began to withdraw. With the war in Western Europe over, and a new homeland to return to, the Czechoslovak Legion was finally evacuated. By June of 1920, all of the Allied forces (with the exception of the Japanese) had left Siberia. Japanese troops would stay on until October 1922, when diplomatic pressure from England and the United States, as well as opposition from their own people, forced them to call their troops home.

Defrosted Weapons Report: American Arms in Russia
American troops deployed to Siberia with a full complement of modern small arms. The backbone of U.S. forces was the excellent M1903 Springfield rifle. Supporting arms included the new M1917 Browning .30-cal. machine gun and the Browning Automatic Rifle. Troops carried the .45-cal. M1911 pistol as their sidearm.


Springfield rifles in Russia: U.S. infantry in Siberia in the spring of 1919.

There was no shortage of weapons or ammunition. Records indicate that more 10 million rounds of .30-cal. ammunition were sent to Siberia, along with 350,000 rounds of .45-cal. ammo. There was plenty of ammunition to feed the 16 Browning M1917 machine guns, 46 M1915 Vickers machine guns, 370 Browning Automatic Rifles, more than 1,000 M911 pistols and approximately 7,000 M1903 rifles that armed the troops in Siberia.


The M1915 (.30 cal.) Colt-Vickers machine gun. The Siberian intervention force had nearly 50 of these highly effective MGs in their arsenal.

The 27th and 31st Infantry Regiments arrived in Vladivostok equipped with the Model 1909 Benet-Mercie light machine guns, but these were quickly replaced by BARs and the Benet-Mercie MGs were returned to the Philippines.


The machine gun cart for the M1917 Browning machine gun proved popular among the troops stationed in Siberia.

The M1903 rifles and BARs received high marks from the infantry as well as the ordnance specialists. The Vickers and Browning heavy machine guns operated flawlessly, and their supporting “machine gun carts” (normally towed by a mule) were highly valued. A metal towing pole and rope were provided so that the MG carts could be towed by hand if needed.


The “Amerikanski Colt,” The M1911 pistol developed an intimidating reputation among the Russians on both sides in Siberia.

Apparently, the M1911 pistol gained quite a reputation during its service in Siberia. There are claims that the “Amerikanski Colt” could disperse unruly crowds with just the mention of its name. Those big .45 slugs could make equally big holes in “Reds” or “Whites” alike and provide a fitting testament for America’s attempt to bring peace to Russia through superior firepower.

Additional Reading:
Cold Front: American Troops in Russia 1918-1919

Categories
Allies Real men Soldiering War

Bloodiest Fight Since WW2 – British Forces Battle at Imjin River

Categories
Leadership of the highest kind War

Why was the German Army so Combat Effective in WW2?

Categories
War

How Malta was Saved

Categories
All About Guns Ammo War

How does a Cluster Bomb Work fired from an Artillery Gun

Categories
All About Guns War

Pak 40 – Best Gun of the War?

Categories
All About Guns Allies Soldiering War

The Battle of Ginnis 1885 Sudan | The Last battle the British fought in their Redcoats

Categories
All About Guns War

THE M1 GARAND & THE COLD WAR By TOM LAEMLEIN

World War II may have ended with the birth of atomic weapons, but despite the emergence of nuclear war-making ability it had taken John Garand’s legendary invention to bear the brunt of keeping the world safe from tyranny.

The M1 rifle had outfought and outshot the Axis on every battlefront, and by the time the peace had been won, nearly 5.4 million M1 rifles had been made. The Garand had beaten the full gamut of enemy rifles, from the classic bolt action Mauser and Arisaka types, to the semi-automatic Gewehr 43 and the newfangled selective-fire Sturmgewehr.

The M1 rifle with South Vietnamese (ARVN) troops in October 1963 during the Vietnam War. Image: NARA

In the early post WWII-era, many M1 rifles were returned to the United States for the extensive arsenal rebuild program for U.S. rifles (this included both the M1 Garand and the M1 Carbine). Worn and broken parts were updated and replaced from stocks to sights, and many rifles were re-barreled. War-weary M1 rifles were made new again, quietly waiting for the next conflict that was sure to come.

Planning for the Long Term

At the end of World War II, the mission of U.S. arsenals changed dramatically — shifting from high-volume weapons production to repairs, rebuilds, and either storage or re-issue of those weapons. The M1 rifle was at the top of that list. While several new research and development projects for a new selective-fire rifle that featured a detachable box magazine were taking place, the lion’s share of standard M1 rifles were brought back to factory-issued condition, and many were placed in long-term storage.

Preparing for the long winter of the Cold War: “Canning” M1 rifles after World War II. Image: SANHS

Beginning in 1950, a new method of preserving rifles for storage was introduced that eliminated the use of the heavy (and much despised) cosmoline grease. The new method was called a “Volatile Corrosion Inhibitor” that leveraged a specially treated foil bag that created a corrosion fighting gas compound once the rifle was sealed inside. Once removed from the bag, the M1 rifle was ready for action with no tedious cleaning required.

M1 rifles were placed in long-term storage for use in a national emergency, delivery to the National Guard or shipment to allies. Image: SANHS

Also developed were special hermetically sealed metal cannisters for “M1 Canning”. These drums used several pounds of desiccant to keep 10 lightly oiled M1 rifles “fresh” for up to fifty years. Other small arms like the M1911 pistol, the M1 Carbine, the Browning Automatic Rifle and the M3A1 SMG were also canned using this same technique.

Back to Asia…

On June 25, 1950, the North Korean communist invasion of South Korea caught the United States by surprise. In August, Congress appropriated $12 billion for America’s armed response to communist aggression. Military budget cuts had been extensive, and the focus of the U.S. military had quickly changed to jet aircraft and atomic weapons. There was little in the form of conventional forces and weapons to deploy to Korea. Even so, the M1 Garand was ready to fight for freedom once again. (Don’t miss my article about the BAR in the Korean War.)

A Marine and his rifle are a dominating force. Here Marines are shown during the Korean War with M1 rifles during 1952. Image: NARA

In many ways, the M1 rifle faced some of its greatest combat challenges during the Korean War. The rifle’s reliable performance in the rugged Korean landscape, and particularly during the intensely cold winter of 1950-51, earned the Garand the respect of friend and foe alike. (Check out my article discussing the M1C and M1D sniper rifles in the Korean War.)

To keep their M1s from freezing shut, the G.I.s opted to remove all lubricating oil and grease during the winter months.

The M1 equipped most of the United Nations infantry units in the Korean War. These men are from the Columbian Battalion. Image: NARA

Despite the stress on the weapon, the M1 kept working, kept firing, and this saved lives in the struggle to turn back communist attacks. Even without a detachable box magazine, or selective fire capability, U.S. and other United Nations infantrymen were able to maintain a high volume of aimed fire, which was critical when facing Chinese “human wave” assaults.

During the Korean War, these U.S. Marines rode with their M1 rifles into battle in a Sikorsky H-19 Chickasaw helicopter. Image: NARA

S.L.A. Marshall’s comprehensive report: Commentary on Infantry Operations and Weapons Usage in Korea, Winter of 1950-51 was considered damning to some U.S. firearms, but certainly not to the M1 rifle. This is his succinct appraisal of the M1’s performance in the frozen hell of Korea:

The issue rifle (M1) has performed adequately in Korea and is regarded by troops with a liking amounting to affection. They have found that it stands up ruggedly against the most extreme tests by terrain, weather, and rough handling. The rifle is sufficiently accurate for the purpose intended. Its record of high serviceability remained unimpaired during the worst storms of the winter. Of all weapons carried by the infantry, the M1 appeared to be least sensitive to heavy frost, extreme cold, and icing. Its “durability” is the great reason why it stands in such high favor with the men. They no longer mind the weight of the piece because of its consistent performance.

Commentary on Infantry Operations and Weapons Usage in Korea, Winter of 1950-51, S.L.A. Marshall

One of the approximately 7,500 soldiers of the “Philippine Expeditionary Forces to Korea”. Image: SANHS

Time after time, round after round, in one war after another, the M1 rifle proved the battlefield value of John Garand’s incredibly sturdy design.

Equipping Friends and Allies

The Cold War was a global conflict, and the M1 rifle helped hold the line against communism all around the world. For many of America’s United Nations, NATO and SEATO allies, the M1 was either a prime or otherwise significant battle rifle throughout the 1950s and well into the 1960s.

Men of the Japanese Ground Self-Defense Force armed with M1 rifles during 1958. Image: NARA

In his amazingly detailed study of the M1, “The M1 Garand Rifle”, noted author and firearms researcher Bruce N. Canfield provides a complete list of the nations that received the M1 rifle: Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Columbia, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Haiti, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Uruguay, Venezuela, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, Israel, Iran, Turkey, Austria, Great Britain, Greece, France, Italy, Netherlands, Belgium, West Germany, Denmark, Norway, Ethiopia, Taiwan, Indonesia, South Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Thailand, Philippines, South Korea, and Japan.

Italy even developed its most significant post-war infantry rifle, the BM 59, from the American M1 Garand. Make sure you read our article “Sibling Rivalry? The Italian BM 59” about this fascinating rifle.

Prior to the end of WWII, the Japanese tried to copy the M1 Garand rifle. Ultimately, they got the real things post-war.

A soldier of the Greek Expeditionary Force in Korea. Hellenic troops fought bravely throughout the war and received two U.S. Presidential Unit Citations for bravery. Image: SANHS

Even as new selective fire “assault rifles” became popular, the M1 rifle was still effective on a modern battlefield. This was particularly true in the many small “brushfire” conflicts that marked the Cold War period. For cash-strapped developing nations, the M1 was also an economical choice, particularly if their ideology aligned with U.S. foreign policy. In many situations during the first twenty years of the Cold War, U.S. foreign aid was labeled: “U.S. Rifle, Caliber .30, M1”

At War Again in Vietnam

Even though the M14 rifle had been adopted by the U.S. military in 1959, millions of M1 rifles remained in U.S. service as well as with Allied nations around the world. By the early 1960s, the M1 rifle was at war again, this time in South Vietnam. A group of 400 U.S. Special Forces advisors went to Vietnam in May 1961. By the end of 1963, that number had grown to 16,000 U.S. troops in country.

In Vietnam, a U.S. advisor of the 77th Ranger Detachment demonstrates off-hand firing to ARVN troops, October 1962. Image: NARA

With more than 220,000 M1s sent to South Vietnam, many South Vietnamese troops, ranging from conventional ARVN units to Vietnamese Popular and Regional Forces, carried the M1 rifle. The Garand also found its way into the hands of the Viet Cong, and U.S. forces captured many M1s from the VC before 1968.

ARVN troops continued to use the M1 rifle on a limited basis right up until the time that Saigon fell in 1975. The big M1 was always considered a little too much rifle for the slight frame of the average Vietnamese, but the size of the rifleman did not change the effectiveness of the rifle. By the 1960s, the times and the troops had changed, but the battle honors for the M1 remained the same for a new generation of fighting men.

Random Shots Around the World

The M1 rifle remained in the American arsenal even as the M14 was standardized, and then the M16 a few years later. The Garand was present at major events, like the ill-fated Bay of Pigs invasion in April 1961 (on both sides), with the U.S. Army’s Berlin Brigade during the construction of the Berlin Wall (beginning in August 1961), and with the Ohio National Guard during the Kent State tragedy in May 1970.

U.S. troops of the Berlin Brigade observe East German construction of the Berlin Wall in August 1961. Image: NARA

In the past 25 years, the M1 has been spotted in use during the Somali Civil War, the Iraq War, the Afghan Wars, and the Syrian Civil War. A full 85 years after it was standardized, the M1 Garand soldiers on — an American firearms icon and a legendary warrior around the world. Who knows what the future holds for “the greatest battle implement ever devised”?

TOM LAEMLEIN

Tom Laemlein is a historian. While that might sound mind-numbingly awful to some, he enjoys it. His deep dives into historical research keep him (mostly) out of trouble and, yet, too often away from the rifle range. Tom is the author of more than 30 books on military history and weapons systems. He regularly contributes articles to national magazines and websites on military history and firearms topics, and historical photos from his collection are used by publishers around the world. In those times that he is cornered in a corporate environment, he will talk about marketing until he is released. Tom is married to a very patient woman, and they live on America’s North Coast, near Lake Ontario. His regular misadventures with Wally, his young Tibetan Mastiff, remind him that life must be enjoyed full-bore, at least until you are ready for a nap.

Categories
War

The WW2 Bomber designed to replace the Flying Fortress

Categories
All About Guns The Green Machine This great Nation & Its People War

The Rifle-Musket did not really influence the Civil War