Category: Gun Fearing Wussies
Trenton, NJ – A newly introduced bill in the New Jersey Assembly would require firearm manufacturers to obtain a state-issued license and pay annual fees tied to the public health costs of gun violence, with proceeds directed to compensate victims.
The proposal, known as the “Responsibility in Firearms Sales Act,” outlines a new regulatory structure affecting manufacturers, retailers, and compensation programs statewide.
The Bill would require firearm manufacturers to obtain annual state licenses to sell in New Jersey. Fees could total hundreds of millions statewide, based on gun violence-related costs. Revenue would fund compensation for victims of firearm injuries and deaths
The legislation, sponsored by Assemblywoman Ellen J. Park, would prohibit firearm manufacturers from selling or distributing products in New Jersey without a valid license issued by the Superintendent of State Police.
Retail dealers would also be barred from selling firearms unless the manufacturer is properly licensed.
Just so you know, this is New Jersey’s new Governor:
NJ Governor Sherrill wears hijab for Eid (whatever the fuck that is). NJ doesn’t look anything like I remember…
They say everything is bigger in Texas, and a lawsuit recently filed by a gun club in the Lone Star State is, indeed, a big one.
On March 10, the Temple Gun Club filed a federal lawsuit challenging the federal statute that prohibits the possession and transfer of machine guns manufactured after May 19, 1986. Temple Gun Club v. Bondi was filed with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas on behalf of the club’s 1,000-plus members, with three individual members also listed as plaintiffs.
According to a report at Ammoland.com, the law originated as a floor amendment during the 1986 debate over the Firearm Owners’ Protection Act (FOPA). Sponsored by Rep. William Hughes, D-New Jersey, the amendment was introduced with little committee review or recorded debate.
It passed by voice vote and was described by its sponsor as uncontroversial. The final law grandfathered in machine guns already registered with the ATF before the May 19, 1986, cutoff date. While it allowed continued possession by government agencies, it closed the registry to new civilian-owned machine guns.
In the complaint, Temple Gun Club is arguing that banning machine guns is outside the scope of Congress’s limited, enumerated powers, and it is an unnecessary, improper usurpation of power.
“Any ‘powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people,’” the complaint states. “There are seventeen specific powers enumerated in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, along with the power ‘[t]o make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.’
The power to prohibit possessing a firearm is neither implicitly nor explicitly among the federal government’s powers. To the contrary, the drafters of the Constitution included a direct prohibition on ‘infring[ing]’ upon ‘the right to keep and bear Arms.’”
The complaint also notes that plaintiffs aren’t seeking total deregulation of machine guns.
“Machine guns are highly regulated at the federal level,” the complaint states. “The NFA provides a comprehensive registration and licensing scheme that tightly controls who may possess and transfer a machine gun. This case does not challenge the NFA. It only challenges Congress’s extra step in § 922(o) to ban possessing machine guns manufactured after 1986.”
Ultimately, Temple Gun Club and the other plaintiffs are asking the court to strike down the law.
“Plaintiff prays for judgment against Defendants and that the Court: (1) declare that 18 U.S.C. § 922(o) is unconstitutional on its face and as applied to Plaintiffs because it exceeds Congress’s enumerated powers;
(2) issue a permanent injunction against the Defendants, as well as all agents, administrators, employees, or other persons acting on behalf of the Defendants, from enforcing 18 U.S.C. 922(o) against TGC and its members, including any corporations, limited liability companies, trusts, or other entities that TCG members own, control, or serve as officers, beneficiaries, or trustees.
When Gun Owners of America took to social media to warn Texans about James Talarico, they did not mince words. “James Talarico has opposed constitutional carry, while supporting ‘universal background checks’ & red flag laws,” the organization posted. “Now he wants to represent Texas in the U.S. Senate. Talarico will find out at the polls this November that Texans will never accept tyranny.”
The warning reflects growing alarm among Second Amendment advocates as Talarico, a Democratic state representative from Round Rock, advances toward the November 2026 general election against Republican incumbent John Cornyn. A former teacher who frequently invokes his Christian faith when discussing policy, Talarico won the March 2026 Democratic primary and now stands as his party’s standard-bearer in one of the most closely watched Senate races in the country.
Talarico’s legislative record on firearms leaves little doubt about where he stands. In 2021, he voted against HB 1927, the landmark constitutional carry bill that eliminated the requirement for a License to Carry for adults 21 and older to carry handguns openly or concealed.
On his Vote Smart political courage test, he answered Yes to both “Should a license be required for gun ownership?” and “Do you generally support gun-control legislation?”
In that same questionnaire, Talarico explained his philosophy. “I respect the Second Amendment rights of our constituents and believe that Texas should lead the way in promoting safe firearm regulations,” he wrote. “The uptick of violence — from deadly domestic abuse to suicide and school shootings — our state and nation have experienced is simply due to the fact it is too easy for the wrong people to gain access to guns.
Texans agree we need to make our communities safer through common-sense gun safety measures and greater mental health resources. This means ensuring universal background checks and restricting gun purchases for people convicted of felonies or violent misdemeanors.”
The Freedom Index, which measures legislative fidelity to constitutional and limited government principles, gave Talarico a cumulative score of just 9 percent across his four legislative sessions. In 2023, Talarico voted No on HB 2837, a bill prohibiting credit card companies from surveilling, reporting, or tracking the purchase of firearms, ammunition, and accessories through merchant category codes
Talarico’s most viral moment on gun policy came in May 2023, days after the Allen outlet mall shooting that killed eight people. Texas Republicans brought HB 2960 to the House floor, a bill to loosen gun regulations. Talarico delivered an impassioned floor speech against it.
“We’re the only country in the world that allows this to happen,” he declared. “Globally, we are not an outlier in mental health. We’re not an outlier in school security. We’re an outlier in the number of readily accessible weapons of war in our community.”
He continued, “You can’t offer thoughts and prayers on Monday and then debate a bill to loosen gun regulations on Tuesday.”
After the March 2026 Austin mass shooting on West Sixth Street, Talarico again called for gun restrictions. “We prayed, and God sent lawmakers with common-sense gun safety proposals like universal background checks, red flag laws and closing the gun show loophole,” he stated.
His Senate campaign platform makes his priorities explicit. According to his official website, Talarico supports universal background checks for all gun sales, prosecuting firearms traffickers, safe storage requirements for firearms around children in the home, and raising the age to purchase semi-automatic rifles with military-style features like high-capacity magazines.
Texas Gun Rights described him as “the more dangerous” of the two Democratic Senate candidates in the primary, describing him as someone who “plays the ‘reasonable’ gun control advocate — the type who thinks disarming you is an act of Christian charity.”
TXGR President Chris McNutt’s assessment was blunt, stating, “Anyone — Democrat or Republican — who thinks they can run for office in Texas while supporting a gun confiscation agenda is about to get the political fight of their life.”
Texans who value their Second Amendment rights should take Talarico at his word. His legislative record tells a consistent story.
He opposed constitutional carry and voted against protecting gun owners from financial surveillance.
He supports universal background checks, red flag laws, safe storage mandates, and age restrictions on rifle purchases. Pro-gun organizations such as Texas Gun Rights and Gun Owners of America have all sounded the alarm.
Talarico dresses his gun control agenda in the language of faith and reasonableness, but the policies he advocates would infringe on the rights of law-abiding Texans while doing nothing to stop criminals who already ignore the law.
In a state that enshrined Constitutional Carry into law, Talarico represents the opposite vision, one where the government decides who may exercise their natural right to self-defense and under what conditions. For gun rights to continue to prosper in the Lone Star State, candidates like Talarico must be defeated at the polls
About José Niño
José Niño is a freelance writer based in Charlotte, North Carolina. You can contact him via Facebook and X/Twitter. Subscribe to his Substack newsletter by visiting “Jose Nino Unfiltered” on Substack.com.