Categories
Fieldcraft

Hock’s Blogs CHOKES AND NECK ATTACKS – LEGAL AND MEDICAL ISSUES

Attacking the Neck for Restraints, Takedowns and Chokes

A martialist must have a working knowledge about the anatomy, physicality and the law when it comes to wrapping arms around  the neck for any reason, a walk-away, takedown and/or any choke. Here is quick, mandatory report on what you should know on the subject in general.

First, I would like to establish my anecdotal experience. I am from an era, starting in the 1970s in martial arts and police work where chokes were very popular and roughly trained. A choke was a go-to, common enforcement move and in 26 years I have choked out about 10-12 or so people. That is not a lot, As an obsessive martial artist, training and experience has helped me use alternatives to choking. But I have witnessed and partaken in some 40 or more. Every suspect quickly recovered as we were taught to monitor the suspect’s responses. And I have been attacked by a few chokeholds, most during during arrests (read on for the worst). And in those olden training times, it was not uncommon to be accidentally choked out (and knocked out) sometimes in class. Times have changed.

Chokes were treated very flippantly in those olden times. Sadly, in the recent decades that followed, for whatever reasons – be they a lack of knowledge-training, etc., simple chokes have caused damages and deaths that have enraged into socio-political, national and international uproars.

You do not want you or your students, compatriots and-or employees to be a part of such uproars. Results may include imprisonment these days, by ignoring the facts. Chokes are risky yes, but, still, a martialist must have a working knowledge of chokes and non-choke, neck grabs.

While such sport-choke and related sport neck takedown methods are useful to practice and know, they are small in comparison to self defense, crime, law and war problem-solving. So, this subject-study will include civilian, enforcement and military realities, as well as generic, applications of arm wrap, chokes and neck grabs.

Due to popularity and fandom of martial arts sports, most of the neck-related, training attention, time-hubris is spent on sport tap-out chokes down on the mats to win matches and pro fights. This sports version eats up “all the oxygen” (if you will pardon the pun) in youtube videos and internet searches. Several martial arts will claim there are “100s” of chokes, but no. Instead, there might be hundreds of chess-like approaches and situations to inch into these chokes. The choke itself is “checkers simple.” Blood and air.

And important – all neck attacks are not chokes…however, neck attacks are loosely, flippantly called “chokes” or “chokeholds” by many. We’ll be looking at the common arm-related ones not crushing-hand chokes, but crushing hand chokes might cause similar injuries as arm wraps.(It should also be noted here that choking by the hands not arms is a very big domestic violence problem. That’s another essay. But generically speaking, the injuries are very the same.)

The big two… for our rear arm wrap attack and takedown essay and yes – as well as grounded problems, here are two main neck arm-wrap-grabs for rear chokes and takedowns. See the drawings below, single arm and double arm wraps. You will find there are numerous nicknames for chokes. Some do help identify the move-position. Blood chokes are often called “sleepers” because the “chokee” thinks he is really just neck-uncomfortable and still okay… and… and… he’s out. While an air choke will probably cause the chokee to “air swim,” like he is drowning on dry land.

What are the legal and medical definitions? Law Insider defines a neck restraint as “the use of any body part or object to attempt to control or disable a person by applying pressure against the neck, including the trachea and-or carotid artery with the purpose, intent, or effect of controlling or restricting the person’s movement or restricting the person’s blood flow or breathing, including chokeholds, carotid restraints, and lateral vascular neck restraints.” (For the record, a “Lateral Vascular Neck Restraint® (LVNR®) is a control technique applied to the sides of the neck, using a combination of physiological factors to restrict blood flow to the brain which may cause the subject to lose consciousness.)

Dr. Google defines choking as a strangulation. “Strangling cuts off the flow of oxygen to the brain in one or more ways. Strangulation compresses the carotid artery or jugular veins, resulting in cerebral ischemia. Cerebral ischemia is caused by disruption of the blood supply, and thus oxygen, to the brain, particularly the cerebrum. Global ischemia is caused by cardiac arrest, shock, carotid occlusion,hypotension, asphyxia, or anemia. Focal cerebral ischemia is usually related to cerebral vascular atherosclerosis. Strangulation is defined as asphyxia by closure of the blood vessels and/or air passages of the neck as a result of external pressure on the neck.”

Non-choke neck grabs, restraints and takedowns can look like attempts at unconscious choking, but can be just temporary control measures. You can just remove-escort or takedown people via the neck area without choking them. Or you can follow up a takedown that includes a choke. With your  decision to squeeze-choke the neck, your legal and medical strangulation clock is ticking…

Tick-Tock…. In May, 2023, a former U. S. Marine interrupted a disturbance and threats on a New York City subway with a choke, one that according to witnesses the hold lasted 15 minutes. The person died. The Marine disputes the time length and denies lethal intent, but nonetheless the man died. This caused a serious socio-political incident and put the Marine under indictment for murder. One must be very cautious when doing any neck wrap choke-contact for criminal and civil problems. Did a restraint slip into a prolonged blood choke or an air choke? Did the hold last too long?

Very Well Health reports that, a “A medical evaluation is crucial if someone’s been strangled. An injury to the trachea may not appear to be serious right away, but swelling in the tissues around the trachea can lead to a secondary restriction of airflow a few minutes after the neck is free.”

So how long can you squeeze? Police files report officers that have blood-choked suspects held for 30 seconds have died. That’s a short time. But shorter times are on record. There are other times the suspects hang on, struggling for longer. The old and general advice with a blood choke is to monitor the opponent. You can feel when someone “goes to sleep.”

How long is long then? “A 17-member panel of submission experts (including BJJ black belts, experienced grapplers, former MMA athletes, and medical professionals) analysed 81 UFC matches between 1993 and 2020 that ended in strangulation submission due to a LOC (as opposed to tapping). Each examiner reviewed each film (blinded to the other’s interpretation) to determine the time between full application of the technique and LOC. The mean time to LOC was 9.0 seconds, with a standard deviation of 2.5s. (Note: this had to have included ground chokes and this section of Level 2 takedowns is only covering standing rear arm wrap chokes. Still we can glean related information.)

These results were consistent with previous studies in compliant volunteers, indicating that skillful application of a choking/strangulation technique will cause LOC regardless of defense mechanism…the triangle choke (probably down on the mat) displayed a significantly faster time to LOC of 7.2 seconds.”  – Sam Gilbert

Crushing the trachea can cause death. There are incidents on police records of officers who are relatively untrained in this subject matter and they have accidentally crushed the trachea. The damage can range from minor vocal cord weakness to fractures of the larynx or trachea. These fractures can cause air to escape into the neck and chest, leading to significant respiratory compromise and even death if not treated quickly.

Basic neck structure injuries too…  As I have mentioned not all neck-related, rear pull takedowns involve blood and air restraint, choke-to-unconsciousness intent. In terms of using the neck for takedowns and counters, in some cases you must worry about damaging the neck skeletal structure.  But non-chokes are not without some medical, legal and civil law dangers.

The most damaging neck takedown I have seen and had done on me, thankfully incorrectly, is what was once called the “Ranger Takedown.”   In the remote northern areas of  South Korea, a criminal Army Sergeant snatched up my throat from behind with a single forearm across my neck and jumped back, as diagrammed here to the left. In the taught move, the Ranger lands on his chest. The enemy soldier lands on his back. Neck? Snapped or very badly broken. I landed instead down on my side, saving my neck, with his forearm across my windpipe. he continued to choke me. Since his hand was somewhat next to my chin, I broke a finger on his wrapping arm causing him to release me. For such escapes, always breaking a finger is not possible and will not always work, but it did for me that time.

I tell you this to explain the worst-case scenario of what a single arm, (or double arm,) rear neck-wrap takedown can do at its most “bone-damaging.” You can still single or double arm throat pull, slower, and NOT land flat down into this death move, but rather make space and pull him slowly down on his back, with you remaining bent-half-standing or kneeling. Blood choke if you must, but let go at the right instant.

Other related neck structure injuries? I know of a few rather world famous, life-long MMA champs that have stents placed in their trachea due to decades of rough training simulated chokes, and real competition chokes. This operation is called a tracheostomy.

Dr. Earl Morgan, Forensic medicine (and a Judo Black belt) adds…”In all of the combative grappling sports the “choke” hold rules require varying degrees of cervical spine protection. Of course, what makes repetitive chokes in combative grappling so safe (in class) is the health and conditioning of young martial artists. My college judo coach cautioned me to seriously consider allowing chokes in anyone over the age of 40. At the time I was in my 20’s and had no idea what the big deal was. He also spoke of the ‘40-year syndrome.’ This is where you turn 40 and suddenly you have all the aches and pains from all the ways you abused yourself when you were young, whether with drugs, alcohol, athletics, manual labor or other factors, it doesn’t matter. He was a much wiser man than I realized.”

Worrying about the counters… Through the decades in training various counters to chokes and side neck guillotines, I noticed that complying savvy workout partners, always let go of their friend-trainee’s necks when they are flipped or tripped. I don’t think many real-world opponent’s will let go of your neck, instead they reflexively hang on (to anything!) as they lose their balance. This means serious neck cranks, not seen or warned in training class. This innocent-helpful, classroom, “let go” practice leads to misleading and dangerous reality results. There is a lot that can happen between step 3 and step 4, in the drawing to right-above.  After issuing similar safety concerns publically about this in the past, I received numerous reports of minor to major injuries from people countering chokes in classes. (I also heard from macho, low I.Q., half-wits denouncing me as a wus. Do they denounce Bass Rutten as a wus too?)

Even MMA great Bass Rutten wisely warns on record and on film, after demonstrating counter-choke flips like the ones shown on the right and above, that you might break your neck if the choker holds on as he flips. Needless to say a taller, stronger, heavier enemy probably won’t be so easily flipped over you. And, your body drop to flip him over could leave you…  “hanging.” All practitioners should examine suggested choke counters for neck safety.

Banning chokes...I have been paid by some police agencies through the years to write subject-matter-expert studies on the validity of neck restraints and chokes. In some jurisdictions worldwide police agencies have continued to defend the use of the carotid restraint hold for decades, claiming that it is safer and more effective than using a police baton, taser, or pepper spray. Other jurisdictions have banned its use entirely while still other jurisdictions have ruled that it may only be used in extreme situations where deadly force is justified.

Most enforcement agencies worldwide have banned this “choke’ tactic (or any neck contact for that matter) for many years now. Some allowances exist for when the officer is faced with deadly force. Yet, in a strange Catch-22 circle jerk, these last-resort, life saving choke options are still NEVER TAUGHT, for fear of…being publically seen-caught just teaching the dreaded chokes!

There are some departments that allow these no-choke, neck-grabs and even neck-squeezing controls on unruly suspects and detainees, and a tiny percentage of people continue to suffer temporary and-or grave injury and death. Due to these virtually devastating socio-political problems from these “I can’t breathe” accidental deaths, and due to the rodeo-like wrestling of suspects, a blood choke can often accidentally twist and slip into a throat choke-crush. Because of this slipping mishap, I must warn police administrations against the common use of chokes in less-than-lethal situations. This usually translates to an admin – “leave the whole neck alone unless you are being killed” policy. Don’t blame me for my warning. Train your troops!

At least think about this...In a military context, other than when trying to capture prisoners, a choke is a strangulation meant to kill the enemy. But for citizens? These same legal-test concerns hold true for citizens. Civilians must be justified under a reasonable dire threat to windpipe choke someone. If you can’t comprehend the facts here, or be able to consider, discuss, teach and articulate them, you and yours might someday be in moral, ethical and legal (jail and lawsuit) dilemmas.

(This essay on non-choke and choke related neck wraps rear takedowns appear in Level 2 of my Force Necessary:Hand course, thus the essay here, which appears in the outline and my upcoming Unarmed Combatives book in 2024.)

Categories
Fieldcraft

3 THINGS to do when PEOPLE STARE at YOU with BAD INTENTIONS

Categories
All About Guns Fieldcraft

What’s the fastest way to shoot a Brown Bess? No, it’s not Sharpe’s “spit loading” method.

Categories
All About Guns Fieldcraft

How Deadly Is A 22 Pistol? 22 Pistol vs Human

Categories
Fieldcraft Gear & Stuff

Pepper Spray for Self-Defense: The Middle Ground Between Words and Bullets

Categories
Fieldcraft

Kit Carson has nothing on him!

Categories
All About Guns Fieldcraft

Leg Shot Syndrome By David Nash

I talk a lot about lethal force, and one concept comes up almost universally. I call this idea the leg shot syndrome. The leg shot syndrome is expressed by the statement “I wouldn’t aim to kill; I would shoot the robber in the leg.”

I believe I know where this thought comes from. It comes from the fact that everyone I give firearms classes to comprise the “good guys.” Good guys don’t go around killing, robbing, raping and hurting people. They believe that everyone has redeeming qualities. Good guys don’t want to kill people, they didn’t start the encounter, and if they had their way, the bad guy would just leave.

Now before I get tons of hate mail, let me say that I understand the reason people think this, and I wish everyone in the world felt that way. If there were no bad guys, there would be no crime. I could then put more energy into my primary job of preparing for natural disasters instead of diverting energy to preparing for criminal disasters. While understanding and admiring this idea, I want to emphasize that this is not a good way to apply this concept.

There are many reasons why this philosophy is not sound in the lethal force arena. Some of these reasons are legal, some tactical, and some, yes, are even moral. I will jump into what I hear as the most widely used reason why the leg shot syndrome should not be used, legal.

A handgun is a lethal weapon. Unlike a baseball bat, a butcher knife, or a policeman’s baton, there is no less lethal way to use a handgun against another human. The law does not distinguish the difference between shooting a person in the head, and shooting a person in the chest. If there is not legally defensible motive and the person dies it is still murder. A bullet cannot be recalled once it leaves the barrel, and the person who fired the bullet cannot decide what it does upon entering a person. There is a major artery in the human leg (the femoral artery), which if severed can kill a person as quickly as shooting them in the chest.

Tactically manipulating a firearm under lethal force pressure is extremely hard. Quite a few books and statistics from a vast amount historical data show that only about 1/3 of the rounds fired impact on the target. This doesn’t seem to be that bad, until you look at other statistics that show approximately 90% of gun fights happen under 7 yards and comprise less than 3 total shots. How realistic is it then that when most people can would be lucky to hit their attacker, you are going to hit one of the smaller areas, and an area that is most likely to be moving?

Tennessee (and every other state I have found that has a defined handgun training curriculum) specifies shooting center-mass with the intent to stop. This involves two concepts.

The first being center-mass, which means aiming your projectile to impact inside the largest target area (the chest), since this is the area you have the greatest ability to actually hit. Also, a hit in the chest area has the greatest probability of stopping your attacker.

Intent to stop means neither aiming to kill, or shooting to wound. Either of these are irrelevant; your legal self defense right is centered upon the attacker being able to kill you, and trying to kill you. If the mere presence of your legally owned firearm cause the attacker to stop, it has done its job. If one well placed round to center mass persuades the criminal to stop, that’s okay. However, if it takes 3.5 boxes of cartridges to stop a drug crazed, gangbanging, terrorist from killing you, then so be it.

This intent to stop is the first half of my moral argument. The other reason comes from plain street sense. I have spent a few years working in corrections. These years are split between entry level corrections, working on the recreation yards and cages listening to inmates talk about themselves and their crimes, to working as a supervisor in maximum security units and applying inmate psychological knowledge to help keep the prison running smoothly.

Criminals do what they do because it works for them. If a mugger or a rapist tries to talk you into leaving with him, it’s because it has worked for him before. Believe me, a violent criminal hasn’t decided to start being a violent criminal just because you are there; a criminal starts small and works up gradually, becoming more violent. If a criminal gets away with hurting you, he will do it to someone else.

I am not saying that vigilante justice is okay. I am not advocating deadly force as a punishment for a criminal, either. What I am saying is that you are a reasonable person, with an inalienable right to life and liberty, minding your own business, living a peaceful life. You have a right do what you need to do to be safe, to go home to your family. This criminal attacked you, tried to hurt you for no reason other than his personal gain. You’re not trying to kill him, only making him stop trying to kill you. That is not wrong, that is right. Your family needs you, make sure you do what needs to be done to be there for them.

Categories
Fieldcraft

Everything you need to know about EYE DOMINANCE

Categories
All About Guns Fieldcraft

What weapons and calibers are best for home defense?

Categories
All About Guns Ammo Fieldcraft

Is the 45 ACP Good for Self Defense? A Comprehensive Look By Scott Witner

An M45A1 pistol is laid out on top of a Force Reconnaissance Marine’s loadout prior to a visit, board, search and seizure (VBSS) operation aboard the amphibious assault ship USS America (LHA 6), Philippine Sea, Feb. 2, 2022. VBSS training reinforces the Marine Corps’ presence within the weapons engagement zone by having a team ready to act in a moment’s notice. The 31st MEU is operating aboard ships of America Amphibious Ready Group in the 7th fleet area of operations to enhance interoperability with allies and partners and serve as a ready response force to defend peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Lance Cpl. Cesar Ronaldo Alarcon)

Choosing the right caliber for self-defense can be daunting, especially with so many options available. One round that consistently stands out is the .45 ACP. Trusted for over a century by military personnel, law enforcement and civilians, the .45 ACP has earned its reputation for delivering powerful stopping power in critical moments. But is it the best option for protecting yourself and your loved ones?

Let’s break down the key advantages of the .45 ACP for self-defense, addressing common concerns like capacity and recoil, while highlighting why it remains a go-to choice for many experts. Whether new to firearms or a seasoned shooter, you’ll learn how this trusted round can enhance your personal protection.

The History of the .45 ACP

The .45 ACP has a rich and compelling history that adds to its appeal as a self-defense round. Developed in 1905 by the legendary firearms designer John Moses Browning, the .45 ACP was created to meet the U.S. military’s need for a more powerful sidearm. The result was a round providing significantly more stopping power than its predecessors. This led to adopting the M1911, a .45 ACP handgun, which became a staple for the U.S. military from World War I through Vietnam and beyond.

The National Match M1911 .45 caliber service pistol is used during the individual pistol portion of the 2014 Marine Corps Championships from April 14-16 aboard the Weapons Training Battalion ranges at Stone Bay. The individual pistol match is shot at the 25-yard line and 50-yard line, and must be shot one-handed. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Sgt. Alicia R. Leaders/Released)

The .45 ACP’s battlefield performance solidified its reputation as a hard-hitting, reliable round that could neutralize threats with minimal shots. Its larger, slower-moving bullet made it particularly effective at close range, where self-defense situations often occur. Despite the rise of smaller, higher-velocity rounds like the 9mm, the .45 ACP has maintained popularity due to its historical success in real-world combat scenarios.

Stopping Power: The Main Advantage of the 45 ACP

When discussing self-defense calibers, the term “stopping power” is often a key consideration, and the .45 ACP is renowned for its ability to stop threats quickly. The cartridge typically fires a larger and heavier bullet weighing 185 to 230 grains, which transfers significant energy upon impact. This energy transfer can incapacitate an assailant more effectively than smaller, faster rounds. This stopping power can be critical in life-threatening situations where the goal is to neutralize the threat as quickly as possible.

(Photo: HOP Munitions – 230 grain JHP)

The .45 ACP’s larger diameter also creates a wider wound channel, causing more tissue damage. This often leads to faster incapacitation, even if only one or two rounds are fired. Many proponents of the .45 ACP argue that it requires fewer shots to stop a threat than smaller calibers like the 9mm, making it a strong candidate for personal defense.

Moreover, modern ammunition advancements, such as jacketed hollow points (JHP), have further enhanced the stopping power of the .45 ACP. These rounds are designed to expand upon impact, reducing the risk of over-penetration and increasing the likelihood of the round staying within the target—an important factor in self-defense to avoid unintended harm.

Accuracy and Controllability

While the .45 ACP is known for its stopping power, it also offers a surprising level of accuracy and controllability, making it a solid choice for self-defense. One might assume that a larger, heavier round would produce excessive recoil, but this isn’t always true. The .45 ACP operates at a relatively low muzzle velocity (typically around 830 feet per second for a 230-grain bullet), which helps manage recoil and makes it easier for the shooter to stay on target.

Army Reserve Cpl. Anton Shekhalevich, 412th Theater Engineer Command, fires a Colt 1911 pistol during a CIOR pistol practice event at Camp Ethan Allen Training Site in Vermont on July 21, 2022. The Interallied Confederation of Reserve Officers Military Competition (CIOR MILCOMP) is a three-day team competition consisting of NATO and Partnership for Peace nations in Europe. It has been around since 1957. The competition is open to all reserve components for both NCO and officer. It is now run on a volunteer basis and funded by former competitors through an alumni association. (U.S. Army Reserve photo by Calvin Reimold)

For many shooters, especially those with experience, the .45 ACP can feel more controllable compared to smaller, faster rounds like the 9mm. The slower recoil impulse allows for better follow-up shots, a critical factor in self-defense scenarios where accuracy and quick reaction times are essential.

Additionally, many .45 ACP pistols are built with ergonomics and weight distribution in mind, further aiding in recoil control. Guns like the 1911, a popular platform for the .45 ACP, are often praised for their balance, which can help shooters maintain precision even under stressful situations.

While novice shooters may initially find the .45 ACP’s recoil more challenging, proper training can mitigate this concern. Once a shooter is accustomed to the feel of the .45 ACP, they often appreciate its manageable recoil and accuracy at close to medium distances, the most common ranges for self-defense encounters.

Reliability: Trusted for Self-Defense

Reliability is one of the most critical factors when choosing a self-defense caliber, and the .45 ACP shines. Whether used in military, law enforcement, or civilian applications, the .45 ACP has a proven track record of dependable performance. In high-stress, life-or-death situations, the last thing you want is a firearm malfunction, and the .45 ACP’s reputation for reliability makes it a trustworthy choice.

One reason for this reliability is the round’s low-pressure design, which helps reduce wear and tear on firearms. Many pistols chambered in .45 ACP, such as the iconic 1911, or modern polymer-frame handguns like the Glock 21, are designed to be durable. These handguns are tested rigorously to ensure they function consistently, even in harsh conditions. This is why many law enforcement officers and military personnel have relied on .45 ACP pistols for decades.

Additionally, the wide variety of ammunition types available for the .45 ACP adds to its reliability. Whether using full metal jacket (FMJ) rounds for practice or jacketed hollow points (JHP) for personal defense, you can find a reliable load that functions well in your firearm. Modern ammunition manufacturers have optimized .45 ACP rounds to ensure smooth feeding, reduced misfires, and enhanced performance, making them a round you can count on when it matters most.

Addressing Common Criticisms: Capacity and Recoil

While the .45 ACP offers many benefits, a few common criticisms are often raised when discussing its suitability for self-defense—primarily its lower capacity and higher recoil compared to smaller calibers like the 9mm.

Magazine Capacity

One of the main trade-offs of carrying a .45 ACP handgun is its reduced magazine capacity. Due to the larger size of the .45 ACP round, most handguns chambered for it hold fewer rounds per magazine. For example, a standard 9mm pistol might hold 15 to 17 rounds, while a .45 ACP pistol typically holds between 7 and 10 rounds.

However, it’s important to note that the need for high capacity can be mitigated with proper training and practice. In many self-defense situations, accuracy and shot placement are far more important than the number of rounds. With the stopping power of the .45 ACP, fewer rounds may be needed to neutralize a threat. Many modern pistols, like the Glock 21, offer extended magazines, bridging the capacity gap between .45 ACP and 9mm handguns.

Recoil

Recoil is another factor that often deters some shooters from using the .45 ACP. The larger round produces more felt recoil than a 9mm, which can be intimidating for novice shooters. However, this disadvantage can be overcome with training. Many experienced shooters find the recoil of the .45 ACP to be manageable, especially when using pistols designed with recoil mitigation features.

The relatively slow velocity of the .45 ACP, combined with modern advancements in handgun design, has made it easier for shooters to maintain control and fire accurate follow-up shots. Guns with recoil springs, weight distribution and ergonomic grips help manage the recoil and keep the firearm on target.

Shooters Weigh in on using .45 ACP for Self Defense

The .45 ACP has been a popular self-defense round for decades, but opinions on its effectiveness and practicality vary widely. Here’s a look at what experienced shooters and firearms enthusiasts think about using the .45 ACP for self-defense, based on real-world feedback.

Training and Familiarity Matter More Than Caliber

One consistent theme among users is that your proficiency with a firearm is more important than the caliber. As one person put it, “If you can shoot it often enough to get good with it, then caliber becomes less important as training and skill increase.” This sentiment underscores that practice and familiarity with your chosen firearm will have a greater impact on self-defense outcomes than whether you’re using a .45 ACP or a 9mm.

Capacity and Ammunition Availability

While .45 ACP is seen as effective, many users highlight its limitations in capacity compared to 9mm. A .45 ACP handgun typically holds fewer rounds, which can be a concern in high-stress self-defense scenarios. As one user noted, “You’ll have less ammo in the mag than a similarly sized 9mm, and ammo to train with will be more expensive. This makes it a less economical choice for frequent practice.Magazines of .45-Caliber rounds are layed out as they are loaded during an exercise for Special Reaction Team, Provost Marshal’s Office, Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort, Aug. 21. The exercise was intended to familiarize the Marines of the team with the M45 1911 A1 pistol as they transition over from the standard issue Beretta M9A1 pistol.

Ballistics and “Bigger Holes”

One of the selling points of the .45 ACP is its ability to create larger wounds due to its larger diameter bullet. However, modern advancements in ballistics have narrowed the gap between the effectiveness of different calibers. One experienced user explained, “I used to be way into .45 ACP because, as people like to say, ‘it makes bigger holes.’ But most modern handgun cartridges have very similar ballistics. Even when using premium ammunition, the difference between a 9mm and a .45 ACP may not be significant enough to matter in most defensive encounters.

The Role of Overpenetration

Concerns about overpenetration are common in home defense. One shooter remarked that the .45 ACP’s slower velocity could make it less likely to penetrate walls or other barriers, making it a safer choice in some situations. However, others point out proper shot placement and ammunition selection will mitigate overpenetration risks regardless of caliber.

Suppression and Recoil Considerations

The naturally subsonic nature of .45 ACP rounds makes them a popular choice for suppressed firearms, with some users specifically mentioning their preference for .45 ACP in home defense setups that include a suppressor. However, recoil remains a concern, as it is generally more pronounced with .45 ACP than 9mm, which could impact follow-up shot accuracy in high-stress situations.

Heckler & Koch Mark 23 .45 cal SOCOM pistol (Photo: Creative Commons)

Overall, the .45 ACP is still considered a viable self-defense option, especially for those familiar with and confident in using the caliber. However, for many, the higher capacity, lower recoil, and cheaper training costs of 9mm handguns make them the preferred choice for everyday carry and home defense. As one user put it, “Regardless of which is actually better, how well it’s used is going to be vastly more important.

It remains a solid self-defense option for those comfortable with the .45 ACP and willing to practice regularly. However, modern 9mm offerings provide capacity, recoil management, and affordability advantages, making them a more well-rounded choice for most situations.

Why the 45 ACP Is a Strong Choice for Self-Defense

When it comes to self-defense, choosing the right caliber is essential, and the .45 ACP makes a strong case for itself. Its combination of historical reliability, stopping power and accuracy makes it one of the most trusted rounds for personal protection. While the criticisms regarding magazine capacity and recoil are valid, they are manageable with the right training and firearm selection. For those prioritizing a proven round that can quickly stop a threat, the .45 ACP remains a top contender.

Ultimately, the best self-defense round is the one you feel most comfortable and confident with, but the .45 ACP offers a balance of power and performance that few other calibers can match. With modern advancements in ammunition and firearm design, the .45 ACP continues to evolve, making it an even more formidable option for those looking to protect themselves and their loved ones.