Categories
Allies

If you want a real & true Friend then get a Dog! Bess Truman

Categories
Allies

Pity there are not in California!

Image result for The Crossroads Pawn and Audio in Little River, S.C
Here is their address for folks in the neighborhood!
The Crossroads Pawn and Audio in Little River, S.C

Categories
Allies

Memorial Day

Categories
Allies War

While you are enjoying the day off!

Categories
All About Guns Allies Darwin would of approved of this! Gun Info for Rookies

Some possible Good news for Ohio!

Ohio Self Defense Reform Bill Passes House Committee

Ohio Self Defense Reform Bill passes House Committee
Ohio Self Defense Reform Bill passes House Committee

Arizona -(Ammoland.com)- Ohio bill HB 228 has passed out of the House Federalism and Interstate Relations Committe on a seven to three vote. The vote was along party lines, with seven Republicans voting for the bill and the three Democrats voting against the bill.
The Ohio legislature is looking to reform Ohio law on self-defense. Currently, Ohio appears to be the only state where the burden of proof in a self-defense case rests with the defender. When a person claims self-defense in Ohio, the defender has to prove that they acted in self-defense. In nearly every other state, the burden of proof is on the prosecution. They have to prove that the defender did *not* act in self defense. From the nraila.org:

HB 228 would place the burden of disproving a self-defense claim onto the prosecution, similar to how it is in almost every other state. Further, House Bill 228 would expand the locations that a person has no duty to retreat from before using force to defend themselves under both civil and criminal law.

Arizona flirted with this reversal of the traditional burden of proof for a decade. Prosecutors lobbied the legislature and reversed the ordinary burden of proof in 1996. It is much easier for prosecutors to obtain a conviction when the burden of proof is shifted to the defendant.
Harold Fish paid the price for the prosecutor’s power grab.
Harold Fish killed a man who was charging at him and yelling that he was going to kill him. The first investigator on the scene reported it was such an open and shut case, he classified it as self defense and did not arrest Harold. The county prosecutor did not like that assessment, so they replaced the first investigator and arrested Harold Fish.
After much public outcry, involving three separate bills passed by the Arizona legislature to change the law, a long appeals process, two vetoes by Democrat Governor Janet Napolitano (a former prosecutor), $700,000 dollars spent on legal defenses, and three years in prison for Harold Fish, the trial court was found to be in error, and Fish was freed. He died three years later.
It is this type of abuse within the legal system that HB 228 is meant to prevent.
Prosecutors in our society have enormous power. They can lie. They can recruit false witnesses. They can have obvious conflicts of interest. They can repeatedly bring prosecutions against people who have committed not crime, for personal reasons. The Supreme Court has ruled that they can not be sued for any of this. They have absolute immunity.
Prosecutors have incredible levels of power. Shifting the burden of proof in self defense cases away from the defendant is a small step in placing limits on that power.
Jim Irvine of Buckeye Firearms says that Ohio is the only state in the United States that has this burden of proof placed on the defender. From buckeyefirearms.com:

“Ohio is the ONLY state in the U.S. with this absurd requirement for burden of proof,” said Jim Irvine, Chairman of Buckeye Firearms Association. “It has been talked about in legal seminars around the country for years. It is an embarrassment to Ohio.
“People under attack should be able to defend their life. They should not have legal hurdles to jump before acting to defend themselves. They should not be second-guessed for years over a decision they were forced to make in a second. Ohio law should protect the victim, not the aggressor. This bill corrects this problem with Ohio law.”

HB 228 has 34 sponsors in the House, and one in the Senate. The Ohio House (the legislative assembly) has 99 members, of which 66 are Republicans. The Ohio Senate has 33 members, of which 24 are Republicans.
The Ohio governor is Republican John Richard Kasich, Jr.
Governor Kasich has been making noises about supporting various restrictions on gun ownership. Those restrictions include outlawing private sales, allowing police to confiscate guns on the basis of basis of “gun violence protection orders” without any due process, and others.  It is unknown if Governor Kasich would sign this self defense reform bill.
©2018 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included.
Link to Gun Watch


About Dean Weingarten:Dean Weingarten
Dean Weingarten has been a peace officer, a military officer, was on the University of Wisconsin Pistol Team for four years, and was first certified to teach firearms safety in 1973. He taught the Arizona concealed carry course for fifteen years until the goal of constitutional carry was attained. He has degrees in meteorology and mining engineering, and recently retired from the Department of Defense after a 30 year career in Army Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation.

 
 
 

Categories
Allies

Good for them!

Did you know that in Ireland you can get a gun faster than you can get a pizza delivery?

Did you know that in Ireland you can get a gun faster than you can get a pizza delivery?

Did you know that in Ireland you can get a gun faster than you can get a pizza delivery? Or that there are almost a quarter of a million legally held guns in the country?
These are just a few of the facts that are raised tonight in TV3’s News Special programme entitled Ireland’s Gun Crime Crisis. The programme aims to highlight the current problem of gun crime in Ireland and to show the brutal impact that it can have on individuals and society as a whole.
Gun crime has featured strongly in the news in recent weeks with the killing of 16 year old Melanie McNamara in Tallaght, among other cases.

#AD

According to Conor Tiernan, the producer for the show, the programme will aim to raise awareness about gun crime in the country.
“The purpose of the programme really is to pose the question: how serious is gun crime? Is it better or worse than it was before? How is it impact on people’s lives? How is it impact on society? And what can be done to stop these crimes happening or at least control it?” he said.
The programme also features an interview with a man who is described as a well-known drug dealer and who has direct experience of Irish gun crime.
Mr Tiernan says that while drug dealers are notorious for their reluctance to talk to the media, this drug dealer (who appears wearing a balaclava) was willing to be filmed.

“This particular drug dealer felt so strongly about the shooting of Melanie in Tallaght that he actually felt that things had gone too far, so that’s what led him to do the interview,” he said.
The programme will feature interviews with politicians, journalists, academics and people who have lost partners and relatives to gun crime. There will also be a live studio debate on the topic.
“There’s a lot of ignorance about gun crime. People don’t know much about it because most people live happy lives and don’t come into contact with guns, so one of the central purposes of this programme is to inform people about it,” said Mr Tiernan.
“We’re looking at the illegitimate trade in weapons and its human cost, but we’re also looking at the legitimate side of the gun trade in Ireland which I definitely think is something people don’t know much about,” he added.
Catch the TV3 News Special Ireland’s Gun Crisis tonight at 8pm on TV3.

Categories
All About Guns Allies

National Geographic – Snipers inc.

Well I thought it was interesting!
https://youtu.be/D0MJul9CiU0

Categories
All About Guns Allies

I am really starting to like our President & here is why!

New Trump Regs Would Alleviate Registration Costs for Gunsmiths, FFLs

President Donald Trump (Photo: Twitter)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
A new proposed regulation announced this week by the Department of State could alleviate the massive annual registration fee that has for years kept small gunsmiths and FFLs out of business.
The regulatory amendment would transfer defense articles to the jurisdiction of the Department of Commerce if they are not inherently for military end use and are widely available in retail outlets. The change would remove the annual $2,250 fee required by the Department of State’s Directorate of Defense Trade Control (DDTC), which the Obama administration imposed on gunsmiths who “manufacture” firearms and ammunition.
In 2012 the Obama administration stepped up enforcement of a regulation that required firearm and ammunition manufacturers to register with the DDTC under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR). Because they said that even small gunsmiths engage in activities that are regulated under the ITAR. Many of these small shops closed down because they couldn’t afford the annual registration fee along with compliance costs.
Now the Trump administration’s Department of State is looking to revise these regulations by transferring items currently listed in the United States Munitions List and controlled by the ITAR to the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), which is controlled by the Department of Commerce. These items include non-automatic and semi-automatic firearms and ammunition, as well as their related parts and services. This is good news for gunsmiths because the Department of Commerce does not impose a registration requirement for the manufacture of controlled items and there is no annual fee.

SEE ALSO: GOP Lawmakers Pen Letter to Stop ITAR Gun Control Targeting Gunsmiths

Fully automatic weapons will remain under the ITAR, but so will suppressors, suppressor parts, and any related services. Magazines that have a capacity in excess of 50 rounds will also remain on the list, and companies that manufacture these accessories will be required to register under the ITAR.
The decision to retain these items in the USML seems to contradict the Department of State’s stated goal to “revise the U.S. Munitions List so that its scope is limited to those defense articles that provide the United States with a critical military or intelligence advantage or, in the case of weapons, are inherently for military end use.”
Suppressors and 50+ round magazines are not inherently for military use and are widely available in commercial retail stores throughout the United States. It is unclear why the Department of State would deregulate semi-automatic firearms but retain the burdensome registration fee for companies that manufacture suppressors and high-capacity magazines.
Interested parties may submit comments on the new regs by emailing: DDTCPublicComments@state.gov with the subject line, “ITAR Amendment – Categories I, II, and III.”

Categories
Allies Well I thought it was funny!

So Trumps a Nazi huh?

Categories
Allies The Green Machine War Well I thought it was funny!

Well I liked it!