Category: All About Guns

“You see, this has got to be learned; there isn’t any getting around it.”
Mark Twain, Life on the Mississippi
Don’t you just hate those old-timers who go around muttering, “Things ain’t like they used to be.” I always did, and still do, even when I’m the one doing it. So what is the curmudgeon crabbing about this time? It worries me so many people seem to have forgotten how to learn a new skill. They seem to think there’s some magic trick or inside tip, and it will all be easy.
This may not be want you want to hear, but becoming a good shot takes time and effort. Real improvement doesn’t come easily, nor does it ever get easier. To add a note of encouragement — it doesn’t get harder either.
It takes me a lot of training to acquire a new skill, but on the plus side, once a skill is learned it tends to stick. I can maintain a reasonable skill level with 20 minutes of dry fire two or three times a week, along with 25 or 50 rounds live fire monthly.
To improve, though, I find it more productive to train fairly intensively over a shorter period of time. Let’s say we can afford the ammunition to fire 50 rounds a week, 2,600 rounds annually. My experience has been I’d see considerably more improvement using my 2,600 rounds in sessions of 200 rounds, three times a week, for a month (2,400 rounds). Through the remaining 11 months of the year I could retain most of the improvement with dry fire and 20 careful live fire rounds a month.
I’m not recommending this as a training schedule, as it would take several years to reach our goal. The idea is to get the best return on the investment of resources we do have. When I was competing regularly, I used to average around 25,000 rounds annually, but not spread evenly over the year. As weather and work permitted I’d shoot 200 rounds a day for 10 or 12 weeks. When time and weather was against me I’d use dry fire and shoot a couple live fire sessions a month to maintain what had been learned.
Where’s The Magic?
There’s no magic in 200-round sessions. I’ve found 50 rounds doesn’t show much progress, as it isn’t enough repetitions. On the other hand going much over 200 rounds leads to lack of focus. If I want to shoot more in a day I’ll split the day up into two or more 200-round sessions. Again, what works for me may be too much or not enough for you.
I begin and end every session with precision slow fire, 10 rounds at 25 yards, two hands unsupported. It serves two purposes; it confirms the gun is sighted in, and it reinforces focus on a perfect sight picture and clean trigger break. The last 10-shot group should be roughly the same size as the first. If it is noticeably larger it likely means you’re getting mentally tired and losing focus.
What to practice? I suggest training in one skill at a time. After the ten precision shots, move to a specific skill. Have a written goal and keep a record of every session to track progress. Without a record there’s no way to measure progress.
The goal might be to draw and fire two A-zone hits from seven yards in two seconds, five times in a row. This would not be too hard from a speed holster, but tougher from concealment or a police duty holster, so tailor times to your equipment, needs and the level of skill at which you start out. Set realistic goals. They should make you work, but be achievable within three or four sessions. As skill level improves goals can be set higher.
It never hurts to start at the beginning. Learn to keep your eyes open as the gun fires. Sounds simple? Hardly anyone can do it all the time; many can’t do it at all. Learn to fire one shot accurately. If you can hit an 8″ circle every time at 25 yards you might not win any bullseye matches but you are better than most of the people I see at ranges.
Remington 550-1 Shooting



























SPRINGFIELD, Ill. – A federal appeals court on Friday upheld Illinois‘ prohibition on high-power semiautomatic weapons, refusing to put a hold on the law adopted in response to the mass killing of seven people at a 2022 parade in the Chicago suburb of Highland Park.
A three-judge panel of the 7th District U.S. Court of Appeals voted 2-1 on the issue.
“There is a long tradition, unchanged from the time when the Second Amendment was added to the Constitution, supporting a distinction between weapons and accessories designed for military or law-enforcement use and weapons designed for personal use,” Judge Diane Wood said in the opinion. “The legislation now before us respects and relies on that distinction.”
Ed Sullivan, a lobbyist for the Illinois State Rifle Association, said gun-rights advocates were not surprised by the decision, given the court’s political makeup, though only one of the three judges was appointed by a Democratic president. Sullivan said it’s likely that plaintiffs in one or more of the multiple cases consolidated in Friday’s opinion would seek a U.S. Supreme Court review, where he predicted victory.
At least eight other states and the District of Columbia have some sort of prohibition on semiautomatic weapons.
The law, adopted by a lame-duck session of the Legislature in January, prohibits the possession, manufacture or sale of semiautomatic rifles and high-capacity magazines. It takes effect Jan. 1, 2024.
Known as the Protect Illinois Communities Act, it bans dozens of specific brands or types of rifles and handguns, .50-caliber guns, attachments and rapid-firing devices. No rifle will be allowed to accommodate more than 10 rounds, with a 15-round limit for handguns.
Those who own such guns and accessories when the law was enacted have to register them, including serial numbers, with the Illinois State Police. That process began Oct. 1.
The Illinois Supreme Court upheld the law on a 4-3 decision in August.
“The Protect Illinois Communities Act is a commonsense law that will keep Illinoisans safe,” Gov. J.B. Pritzker said in a statement. “Despite constant attacks by the gun lobby that puts ideology over people’s lives, here in Illinois we have stood up and said ‘no more’ to weapons of war on our streets.”
Gun rights advocates have argued that it’s illogical to define semiautomatic guns as only suitable for the military. They say there are myriad reasons a homeowner would choose to protect family and property with an AR-15 as opposed to a handgun. And such semiautomatic weapons are the choice of many gun owners for sport shooting and hunting, they say.
Further, they note protections the U.S. Supreme Court issued in its June 2022 decision in a case known as Bruen for guns in “common use.” The AR-15 is one, they say, given the millions in U.S. households today. But the court noted that the gun’s popularity rocketed when the 10-year federal assault-weapon ban expired in 2004.
“Most of the AR-15s now in use were manufactured in the past two decades,” Wood wrote. “Thus, if we looked to numbers alone, the federal ban would have been constitutional before 2004 but unconstitutional thereafter.”
The House sponsor of the legislation, Rep. Bob Morgan, a Democrat from the Chicago suburb of Deerfield who attended the Highland Park 4th of July parade where the deadly shooting occurred, praised the decision and joined Pritzker in calling for congressional action.
“This law has already prevented the sales of thousands of assault weapons and high capacity magazines in Illinois, making our state safer,” Morgan said. “We must renew our calls for a nationwide ban on assault weapons and high capacity magazines in order to make mass shootings a thing of the past.”