Author: Grumpy

Its a pity that Winchester made so many. Because it negated the actual investment value of them. But they still make good shooters!

Imagine the stories this piece could tell!

Now having been a Cavalry Scout many years ago. I can see how this is a good idea for mounted heavy infantry. Who has to work out of a armoured vehicle. As it gets mighty cramped in there.

But like all things there is a trade off. In that the shortened rifle can lose some velocity / range. Which can be a problem if you get under long range rifle fire.

Especially when your Tanks & Tracks have either disappeared or been brewed up. Leaving you w/o any heavy fire power to talk back with. It is then when your net gets very busy calling for support.

SVU-AS, a bullpup rifle with the action located behind the trigger.

SVDS, a conventionally configured rifle using the same action.

A bullpup is a firearm with its action behind its trigger group. This configuration permits a shorter overall weapon for a given barrellength. This maintains the advantages of a longer barrel in muzzle velocity and accuracy, while improving maneuverability and reducing weight.
The origin of the term “bullpup” for this configuration is unclear. In 1957, the word was reported to denote a target pistol, particularly one with a fancy stock.^[1]

Description[edit]

The bullpup design places the gun’s action behind the trigger, usually in front of a short buttstock.^[2] The entire magazine is often also located behind the trigger group,^[2] though it is only necessary for the weapon’s feed location to be located there for it to be classified as a bullpup; in some designs such as the Heckler & Koch G11 and Neostead the magazine or magazines extend forward rather than downward.^[3]

The FN P90 uses the bullpup layout in conjunction with a unique top-mounted feeding system, making it the most compact submachine gun with a fixed buttstock

Benefits and drawbacks[edit]

• The primary benefit of a bullpup weapon is that the weapon’s overall length can be significantly decreased without reducing the barrel length. This allows a bullpup weapon to be maneuvered in tight spaces and concealed more easily than a conventional weapon with a similar barrel length.^[4]
• Because bullpups are held closer to the body, they cause less arm fatigue and allow a faster reaction time from a lowered position.
• In a bullpup weapon, the user’s face is much closer to the action. This increase noise issues, can cause spent bullet casings to be ejected into the face of left-handed shooters and renders it difficult for a right-handed shooter to “off-hand” the weapon. ^[2] For weapons with reciprocating charging handles, there is also the risk of the charging handle striking a left-handed user. As a result, bullpups often require unusual ejection mechanisms in order to allow ambidextrous operation. This is solved on some designs with ejection downward (FN P90, Kel-Tec RDB) or forward (FN F2000,^[2] Kel-Tec RFB).^[5]
• In weapons which have reversible bullpup actions, propellant gas can escape from the blanked-off side of the action. In the event of a catastrophic weapon malfunction, the user is more likely to be injured.
• Bullpups tend to have more weight concentrated rearwards than conventional weapons. As a result, they often lack balance, inducing muzzle rise and inaccurate automatic fire.
• The shorter weapon length often results in a shorter sight radius, impairing accuracy at distance, as well as reducing bayonet effectiveness in close combat. However, since bullpups are more frequently used in close-quarters combat, modern rifles tend to use optical sights over iron sights, and bayonets are rarely used in modern combat, this is generally not a huge issue.
• Due to the forward assembly and the necessary trigger linkage, bullpups tend to have less precise triggers. Thus, bullpup trigger pull characteristics are often criticized.^[6]
• Due to the unusual placement of the magazine and controls, shooters accustomed to conventional firearms will take longer to adjust to the manual of arms of a bullpup than they would a different conventionally laid out rifle. In particular, AK-type bullpups can be difficult to load due to their “rock and lock” mechanism. Bullpups often do not have adjustable stocks.
• Some weapons, such as the M16, use the space in the buttstock to store cleaning kits and other tools/accessories. For bullpup designs, these must be stored elsewhere or carried separately.

History[edit]

The concept was first used in bolt action rifles such as the Thorneycroft carbine of 1901, although the increased distance from hand grip to bolt handle meant the decreased length had to be weighed against the increased time required to fire. It is known to have been applied to semi-automatic firearms in 1918 (6.5 mm French Faucon-Meunier semi-automatic rifle developed by Lt. Col. Armand-Frédéric Faucon), then in 1936 a bullpup machine pistol was patented by the Frenchman Henri Delacre.^[7]

EM-2, an experimental British assault rifle of the 1950s.

After World War II, Western engineers drew inspiration from the German Sturmgewehr 44 assault rifle, which offered a compromise between bolt-action rifles and submachine guns. Among them, Kazimierz Januszewski (also known as Stefan Janson), a Polish engineer who had worked at the Polish national arsenal during the 1930s. After being mobilized during World War II he escaped German and Russian forces and made his way to England, where he was a part of the “Polish design team” at Enfield Lock‘s Royal Small Arms Factory. The factory was run by lieutenant colonel Edward Kent-Lemon. As Januszewski was developing a new rifle, the “Ideal Calibre Board” was searching for a replacement for the .303 cartridge. The Board decided on an optimal 7 mm cartridge on which Januszewski and the two teams working at Enfield had to base their designs. One design team led by Stanley Thorpe produced a gas-powered rifle with a locking system based on the Sturmgewehr. The design used steel pressings which were difficult to obtain, and the design was scrapped. The result of the Polish design team’s efforts was the EM-2, which broke significant new ground.^[8]
The EM-2 contained some similarities to the Soviet AK-47, although Januszewski had never seen the Soviet rifle. The first significant bullpup assault rifle came from the British program to replace the service pistols, sub-machine guns, and rifles. In the two forms of the EM-1 and the EM-2, the new rifle concept was born as a result of the experience with small arms that was gained during the Second World War.^[8]
It was obvious that the modern warfare would require the infantry to be armed with a light, selective fire weapon, with effective range of fire much longer than that of a submachine gun, but shorter than that of conventional semi-automatic or bolt action rifles. The bullpup design was seen as a necessity to retain the accuracy at range while reducing overall length. The EM-2 was adopted by the U.K. in 1951 as the world’s first (limited) service bullpup rifle, but was promptly displaced by the adoption of the 7.62×51mm NATO (0.308 in) cartridge, to which the EM-2 was not easily adapted. The decision was rescinded and a variant of the more conventional FN FAL was adopted in its place.^[9]

TKB-408

A 7.62×39mm M43 calibre experimental assault rifle was developed by German A. Korobov in the Soviet Union around 1945, and a further development, the TKB-408 was entered for the 1946–47 assault rifle trials by the Soviet Army, although it was rejected in favour of the more conventional AK-47. The United States briefly experimented in the same year with the integrally-scoped Model 45A bullpup, which never progressed beyond the prototype stage; John Garanddesigned his T31 bullpup, abandoned after his retirement in 1953.
After these failures of the bullpup design to achieve widespread service, the concept continued to be explored (for example: a second Korobov bullpup, the TKB-022PM).

Adoption[edit]

The Steyr AUG was one of the first bullpup rifles to enter widespread use.

FAMAS rifle.

The SAR 21 with the attached Round Corner Firing (RCF) module

FN F2000S

Tavor TAR-21

The L85A2 rifle, variant of the SA80 series of weapons.

The Steyr AUG (selected in 1977) is often cited as the first successful bullpup,^[10][11][12] being in service with the armed forces of over twenty countries, and becoming the primary rifle of Austria and Australia. It was highly advanced for the 1970s, combining in the same weapon the bullpup configuration, a polymer housing, dual vertical grips, an optical sight as standard, and a modular design. Highly reliable, light, and accurate, the Steyr AUG showed clearly the potential of the bullpup layout. The arrival of the FAMAS in 1978, and its adoption by France emphasized the slide from traditional to bullpup layouts within gun designs.^[12]
The British resumed their bullpup experiments with the L85, which entered service in 1985. Following persistent reliability problems, it was redesigned by the then British-owned Heckler & Koch into the L85A2, and it is now a reliable weapon.^[13]
Having learned from extensive combat experience, Israel Military Industriesdeveloped a bullpup rifle: the Tavor TAR-21. The Tavor is light, accurate, fully ambidextrous and reliable (designed to stringent reliability standards to avoid malfunctioning in desert conditions), and is in increasing demand in other countries, notably India.^[2] The Tavor shares many similarities with the SAR 21and the South African Vektor CR-21.^[2] Other bullpups have been recently adopted by the Islamic Republic of Iran Army and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army: the KH-2002 and the QBZ-95 respectively.^[14]
Some sniper rifles such as the American Barrett M95 and XM500,^[15] German Walther WA 2000 and DSR-1,^[16] Chinese QBU-88, Russian SVU, and Polish Bor use the bullpup layout. It is also used for combat shotgun designs such as the Neostead and Kel-Tec KSG.^[17]
Bullpups adopted for current standard issue by various armed forces:

•  AUT: Austrian Armed Forces – StG 77; selected in 1977.
•  AUS: Australian Defence Force – F88 Austeyr; selected in 1989.
•  ARM: Armed Forces of Armenia special forces – K-3; selected in 1996.
•  China: People’s Liberation Army – Type 95; selected in 1997.
•  Croatia: Croatian Army – VHS; selected in 2009.
•  FRA: French Armed Forces – FAMAS; selected in 1978.
•  IRE: Irish Defence Forces – Steyr AUG; selected in 1988.
•  ISR: Israel Defense Forces – IMI Tavor TAR-21; selected in 2001. Micro Tavor MTAR-21 (alternate designation: X95) variant selected in November 2009—to become standard issue for all first-line infantry units except the Kfirand Paratroopers Brigade by 2018.
•  NZ: New Zealand Defence Force – IW Steyr; selected in 1988.
•  OMN: Royal Army of Oman – Steyr AUG.
•  Russia: Spetsnaz – OTs-14 Groza, A-91, and SVU; selected during the 1990s.
•  SIN: Singapore Armed Forces – SAR 21; selected in 1999.
•  UK: British Armed Forces – SA80; selected in 1985.
•  BEL: Belgian Armed Forces – FN F2000; selected in 2004.
•  SLO: Slovenian Armed Forces – FN F2000; selected in 2007.

I have either owned or been allowed to fire quite a few rounds thru this Model. The only thing I have against these fine old guns. Is the fact that the sighting system basically sucks.
So over the years I have seen quite a few of this pistols have the front sight “bobbed” so that the front sight comes to a point. I have also seen a few that have had some bright colored plastic inserted in to the front sight.
Mow while this serious ruins the value of the gun. It does increase its accuracy. So bottom line, it’s damned if you do or damned if you don’t. Your choice!

But all I Know is that Colt & S&W later on. Would put some slowly increasing better sight systems on their later models. That would allow for windage and elevation. Go figure! Grumpy