Categories
All About Guns War

First to Fight the Blitzkrieg: Polish Small Arms in September 1939 by TOM LAEMLEIN

polish_lead_1a-polish-browning-mg-ckm-wz-30.jpg

 

When Nazi Germany invaded Poland on Sept. 1, 1939, they found the Polish military to be inferior in numbers, but not completely short-changed in effective equipment or fighting spirit. Several Polish weapons systems were quite effective, as the invading Nazi and Soviet troops were soon to find out. Some of the Polish infantry weapons may appear quite familiar to American small arms enthusiasts.

The Ckm wz. 30 Heavy Machine Gun
From 1919 until well into the 1920s, Poland’s military used a large amount of older, heavy machine guns that they either inherited, purchased from their allies, or captured in some numbers from their enemies (in this case Imperial Germany, the Austro-Hungarian Empire, and shortly after World War I the Soviet Union). The mix of French M1914 Hotchkiss guns (8 mm French), Russian Maxim M1910 guns (7.62×54 mm R), German MG08 (7.92×57 mm) and Austrian Schwarzlose M.7 (in a wide range of calibers) proved to be a logistical nightmare that the Poles sought to redress.


The business end of the Polish wz. 30 heavy machine gun.

After a series of tests and competitions that concluded during 1928, the Poles were thoroughly sold on the capabilities of the Browning M1917 machine gun, rechambered to 7.92×57 mm. Polish officials had settled on the Colt-manufactured M1928, a commercially manufactured export version of the famous Browning machine gun, and opted to purchase a license to manufacture. The price for the license proved to be prohibitive ($450,000) and Colt also demanded to make the first 3,000 examples in their own factory. The Poles were forced to find alternatives, when a thunderbolt of good luck struck in Warsaw—Colt had never secured a patent of their machine gun in Poland. After discovering the opportunity, the Polish armaments ministry began to manufacture the weapons in Warsaw. By 1931, the first Ckm wz. 30 machine guns were issued to Polish troops.


Polish Home Army resistance fighters prepare a wz. 30 machine gun for action during the Warsaw Uprising in the late summer of 1944.

The Polish variant is recognizable by its longer barrel (28” compared to 24” on the American original) and by a significantly longer flash suppressor. Several tripod mounts were developed for the Ckm wz. 30, all capable of transitioning to the anti-aircraft role with a mast extension (and special AA sights). A shoulder-stock extension was also available. The Ckm wz. 30’s cyclic rate (600 rounds per minute) was equivalent to the US M1917A1. All told, almost 9,000 were made for Polish forces by the time of the German invasion.


Wz. 30 machine guns reviewed by Polish Marshal E. Rydz-Śmigły. (Courtesy Polish National Archives)

The Polski-Brownings were used both before and after Poland fell in September 1939. About 1,700 Ckm wz. 30s were made for Republican Spain and were in action during the Spanish Civil War. The Germans captured many Ckm wz. 30s and used them as the “7.9 mm sMG 30(p)” in second-line and fortress units. The Polish resistance hid a few of the Ckm wz. 30s during the German occupation, and these emerged during the Warsaw Uprising by the Polish Home Army during August of 1944.


After the end of the Battle of Westerplatte, German troops review captured Polish equipment, including the wz. 30 heavy machine gun. Note the special AA sight in the hand of the German soldier in the center.


Wz. 30 set up for AA use aboard a Polish Sokół 1000 motorcycle combination. (Courtesy Polish National Archives)

The Browning wz. 1928 Automatic Rifle
As Poland developed its small army during the 1920s, they paid careful attention to the latest trends in small arms design. The Poles became interested in the new concept of a “squad automatic” and turned their attention to new concepts from western Europe. They ultimately settled on what is now considered a classic American design. After an extensive search and a 1925 arms competition, the Poles chose the Browning Automatic Rifle—in this case a Fabrique Nationale variant made in Belgium. Ultimately this became the “7,92 mm rkm Browning wz. 1928”, chambered in 7.92×57 mm Mauser and first commissioned in 1927.


The Polish BAR: Polish troops with a wz. 1928 automatic rifle (7.92×57 mm). (Courtesy Steve Zaloga)

The first 10,000 examples of the wz. 1928 were made in Belgium at FN. Subsequently, Poland also bought a license to build the Browning automatic in their own country (production in Poland began in 1930). The new wz. 1928 featured a few modifications compared to the US M1918 BAR: a longer barrel fitted with cooling fins, a folding bipod and simplified sights. Some wz.1928s were also equipped with a carrying handle and a “fish-tail” buttstock. About 14,000 were delivered to Polish infantry and cavalry units before the invasion of September 1939.


The wz. 28 in action: Note the enlarged forward grip and the bipod.

By all accounts, the Polish wz. 1928 was a well-made and highly effective weapon, offering all the benefits of the widely celebrated BAR. The wz. 28’s greatest drawback was its lack of extended-fire capability, limited by its use of 20-round magazines. The Poles had planned on producing an extensive number of spare barrels, but the program was interrupted by the invasion. The Germans captured a large amount of wz. 28s, and happily used them in their service throughout the war as the “lMG 28 (p)”.


After Poland fell, Germany acquired a windfall of captured small arms. Here a wz. 28 sits atop a pile of Polish Mauser rifles.

The 7.92 mm Kb. Ppanc. wz. 35 Anti-Tank Rifle
While Germany prepared for the blitzkrieg, the Poles were doing what they could to defend themselves against an attack they felt was inevitably going to come. Poland could afford few armored vehicles, but they did invest in some effective anti-tank weapons. One of the weapons they developed in secrecy was a high-velocity anti-tank rifle:  the 7.92 mm Kb. Ppanc. wz. 35. Patterned after the standard Mauser rifle, the wz. 35 featured an exceptionally long barrel (47 inches, creating a rifle that was 69 inches long overall). A special harness was produced to allow the anti-tank rifleman to carry it on his back.


The unique Polish wz. 35 anti-tank rifle. Chambered for the 7.92×107 mm DS round, the wz. 35’s muzzle brake was particularly effective, reducing the recoil to little more than that of a standard Mauser rifle. (Courtesy SA-Kuva)

A great deal of effort was put into creating the wz. 35’s ammunition:  the 225-gr. 7.92×107 mm DS round. The small 8 mm round relied more on kinetic energy than it did traditional armor penetration. Instead of punching a tiny hole through the armor of an enemy vehicle, the DS round transferred incredible kinetic energy to the armor plate, which normally resulted in “spalling” on the inside of the armor. The impact of the DS round on the armor would break off about a 20 mm plug from the interior surface of the vehicle, sending a molten-hot metal scab ricocheting at killing speed inside the enemy tank. The intention was to kill or wound the crew and set fire to fuel or ammunition. Ultimately the wz. 35’s ammunition was effective out to 300 meters on lightly armored vehicles and was capable of penetrating 33 mm of armor plate at 100 meters.


After Poland fell, the Germans sold some of their captured wz. 35 AT rifles to Finland. This example is seen during training exercises with Finnish troops in the summer of 1942. (Courtesy SA-Kuva)

Initial muzzle velocity was 4,180 f.p.s. Unfortunately, the barrels wore out quickly, often after just 200 rounds. Three spare barrels were issued with each wz. 35 to help with this problem. The Polish design team conquered the powerful recoil of their anti-tank rifle with a highly effective muzzle brake (said to have bled off 65 percent of the additional recoil energy). With the muzzle brake in place, anti-tank riflemen reported that the felt recoil of the wz. 35 was little more than the standard Mauser rifle.

Many of the German tanks and armored cars that were deployed during 1939 were light vehicles with very thin armor. Consequently, the Panzer I (two-man crew) and Panzer II (three-man crew) were vulnerable from the front to fire from the wz. 35. Larger German tanks, like the Panzer III and Panzer IV carried frontal armor that was able to handle hits from the wz. 35 except at very short range. One of the drawbacks of such a small caliber anti-tank weapon quickly manifested itself, as while the wz. 35 proved capable of killing or incapacitating the crews of the German light tanks and armored cars, the DS rounds generally did not destroy the vehicles themselves. A curious by-product of this phenomenon were the so-called “ghost tanks” that the Germans recovered from the battlefield; vehicles that had been temporarily stopped with dead crews, but were quickly re-manned and put back into service.


Germany retained a number of the captured Polish AT rifles, using some of them during the invasion of France in 1940. This example is examined by U.S. troops in Germany during the spring of 1945.  

About 6,000 of the new AT rifles were delivered by the beginning of the war, but since they were developed in secret, most Polish troops had no experience in firing them, nor did they have any tactical guide to use them. The wz. 35 is often known as the “UR,” short for Uruguay, which was a cover name/destination the Poles applied to their AT rifles. They certainly caught the attention of Poland’s enemies—the Germans captured many and put them to work in their service during the subsequent invasion of France as the “7.92 mm Panzerbuchse 35 (p)”. Soviet agents scoured eastern Poland for the “secret rifles,” and captured examples of the wz.35 were used as inspiration for their later PTRD and PTRS anti-tank rifle designs.

Additional Reading:
Uprising! Poland’s Fight for Freedom in Warsaw 1944 

Categories
All About Guns

The MK II** Snider Short Rifle: Introduction

Categories
All About Guns Ammo

30-06 at 3023yards

Categories
All About Guns Gun Info for Rookies

Mosin-Nagant Cleaning Kit (TF 6-05B)

Categories
All About Guns

First Look: Mauser M18 Savanna by AMERICAN HUNTER STAFF

Mauser M18 Savanna Lead

Mauser has announced the introduction of its new M18 Savanna bolt-action rifle, featuring a Savanna tan stock with grip inserts and a threaded barrel for the addition of a suppressor or muzzle brake.

Mauser M18 Savanna Bolt-Action Rifle

Known for its accuracy and ruggedness at an attractive price point, the M18 features a cold-hammer-forged German-steel barrel, three-position safety and adjustable trigger that allows users to set their preferred pull weight ranging from 2.25 to 4.25 pounds. The 60-degree oversized bolt with three locking lugs and two extractor pins allows for quick and smooth cycling of cartridges from the rifle’s standard five-round magazine. Ten-round magazines are also available.

“The new Mauser M18 Savanna presents the opportunity for even more American hunters to experience the benefits of German engineering and manufacturing,” said Jason Evans, CEO of Blaser Group. “This ultra-rugged rifle is a true value delivering superior reliability, durability, and accuracy in its class.”

Mauser M18 Savanna Bolt Action Rifle Action

The M18 Savanna accepts Remington 700 LA-style mounts and is available with a ½x28 threaded barrel in .223 Remington, .243 Winchester, .270 Winchester, 6.5 Creedmoor, 6.5 PRC and 7mm Remington Magnum chamberings, and a ⁹⁄₁₆x24 threaded barrel in .30-06 Springfield, .300 Winchester Magnum and .308 Winchester.

The Mauser M18 Savanna has an MSRP of $849.99, and is backed by a sub-MOA performance guarantee and 10-year factory warranty. For more information, visit mauser.com.

Categories
The Green Machine

Bell V-280 Valor Multi Domain Operations – The Army’s pick to replace the Blackhawk

Categories
Ammo

Behind the Bullet: .454 Casull by PHILIP MASSARO

454_casull_btb_f.jpg

1873 was a pivotal year for firearms and cartridge history; it saw the unveiling of the Colt Single Action Army revolver and the U.S. Army’s adoption of the .45 Colt cartridge. Talk about a match made in heaven! A dependable, strong, accurate revolver, chambered in a cartridge pushing a 255-grain round nosed lead bullet at over 1,000 fps made for a combination that would go on to become the name of a Major League baseball team. Fast forward to the mid-20th Century, and you’d see experimenters pushing the envelope of those late 19th Century cartridges. The .38 Spl. evolved into the .357 Mag., the .44 Spl. morphed into the .44 Rem. Mag., and at the hands of Dick Casull and Jack Fullmer, the .45 Colt would transform into the .454 Casull. While many handgun hunters use the .45 Colt very well in the hunting fields, Casull and Fullmer really cooked up a winner.

Although it was discussed in a 1959 issue of Guns & Ammo magazine, Dick Casull’s namesake wouldn’t be put into commercial production until 1983, when it became available in the Freedom Arms Model 83 revolver. Not that there are any flies on the old .45 Colt—OK, .45 Long Colt, if that makes you feel better—it’s a cartridge that, when chambered in a strong, modern pistol, will give impressive ballistics.

I carry and hunt with the .45 Colt in a stainless Ruger Blackhawk, and wouldn’t hesitate to take any feral hog or black bear with it. But, and this is an important but, no matter what you do to the .45 Colt case it won’t be a .454 Casull. Dick Casull’s case is longer, thicker, stronger and will beat the venerable Colt cartridge by over 300 fps with any bullet weight. Pushing a 300-grain to a muzzle velocity of 1,600 fps, you can effectively use a .454 Casull to hunt anything on the North American continent.

Structurally, the Casull case is more than an elongated .45 Colt. It is longer—1.383” for the Casull vs. 1.285” for the Colt—but it is thicker, with a case head set up for a small primer pocket. The Casull case uses a small rifle primer, while the Colt uses a large pistol primer, which not only provides a hotter spark for the larger powder charge, but enhances the strength of the case.

While the latest developments in hunting handgun technology—namely the gargantuan .460 S&W and the .500 S&W—may dwarf both the .454 Casull and .45 Colt, I feel the .454 makes a perfectly logical balance of weight, recoil and horsepower. Due to the fact that the Casull is simply an elongated .45 Colt case, the Casull chamber can and will shoot .45 Colt ammunition, making for a very effective and affordable practice round, as well as a solid choice for a shooter who is new to using a hard-kicking handgun, and wants to develop good skills at the lower recoil level.

There are many good choices of projectile for the Casull’s power range; bullets that will easily stand up to the higher impact velocities. The Swift A-Frame will make a great choice for those interested in hunting truly large game with a handgun, as will the Barnes XPB. The A-Frames are available in 265, 300 and 325 grain weights, while the Barnes is offered in 200, 225 and 250 grains. Grizzly and Corbon ammunition offer some good hard-cast lead projectiles that will also ruin a game animal’s day. Hornady’s XTP and Speer’s Gold Dot are also wonderful choices for both hunting as well as a personal defense round.

The .454 Casull requires a heavy crimp, to keep the projectiles from working their way out of the case during recoil, so if you intend to load your own ammunition, please keep that in mind. It is not a cartridge for the faint-of-heart, and will require a shooter to put in a considerable amount of time at the practice range in order to become a proficient hunter. However, once that happens, you’ll have a very effective hunting tool in your hands.

Categories
All About Guns

A Smith & Wesson Model 19-3 with a Barrel Length of 6 inches in caliber 357 Magnum

Smith & Wesson Model 19-3 Barrel Length 6 inch Condition Used Metal Condition Excellent Wood Condition Excellent Bore Condition E .357 Magnum - Picture 1

Smith & Wesson Model 19-3 Barrel Length 6 inch Condition Used Metal Condition Excellent Wood Condition Excellent Bore Condition E .357 Magnum - Picture 2
Smith & Wesson Model 19-3 Barrel Length 6 inch Condition Used Metal Condition Excellent Wood Condition Excellent Bore Condition E .357 Magnum - Picture 3
Smith & Wesson Model 19-3 Barrel Length 6 inch Condition Used Metal Condition Excellent Wood Condition Excellent Bore Condition E .357 Magnum - Picture 4
Smith & Wesson Model 19-3 Barrel Length 6 inch Condition Used Metal Condition Excellent Wood Condition Excellent Bore Condition E .357 Magnum - Picture 5
Smith & Wesson Model 19-3 Barrel Length 6 inch Condition Used Metal Condition Excellent Wood Condition Excellent Bore Condition E .357 Magnum - Picture 6

 

Categories
Uncategorized

THE UNDERWATER FIREARMS USED BY THE WORLD’S COMBAT FROGMEN by Travis Pike

Oh, boy, was the Cold War a wild time! Man, the early development of Special Operations forces led to some truly weird developments. SEALs and Spetznaz troopers, in particular, proved that a small team of seaborne commandos could be hell on Naval infrastructure. As such, these seaborne commandos would need specialized weaponry to fight like legitimate frogmen. This led to the development of the underwater firearm concept.

Underwater firearm? Are you serious?

As a heart attack. In the 1970s, there was a vision of teams of frogmen fighting each other underwater as if a Mack Bolan novel came to life. If it were to come true, normal firearms wouldn’t do the trick in frogmen firefights. So, militaries had to develop an underwater firearm, or at least come up with some underwater knife fighting techniques.

So they developed a few different variants of the underwater firearm idea, and I’ve gathered them here today. Plenty of ideas might have been patented, but I only include the underwater firearms that were developed and actually produced. Here are the five we know about. Who knows what others state governments have kept as a secret.

Related: The strangest Spec-Ops firearms in SOCOM’s armory

Mk1 Underwater Defense Gun

The development of the first underwater firearm comes from the United States in the form of the Mk1 Underwater Defense Gun. The Mk1 entered service in 1970, and the Naval Special Warfare center desired to keep it as secret as possible. It became a sign-out-only weapon that required troops to do paperwork to take the weapon out of the armory.

The Mk1 utilized a pepperbox style design, and this means you have individual barrels that rotate and fire. The double-action trigger rotated the cylinder and fired the weapon. As an underwater firearm, the weapon couldn’t use standard ammunition. In place of your normal projectile, they used metal darts.

These 4.25-inch tungsten metal darts had four fins to ensure rotation and looked like a miniature arrow. The effective range of the weapon was only 10 meters, and the darts moved at about 730 feet per second.

Related: Before the Navy SEALs came the Underwater Demolition Teams

HK P11

The Mk1’s replacement came in 1976, and the German firm Heckler and Koch created it. The P11 offered NATO shooters from a variety of nations their first underwater firearm, despite being old hat for the United States by then. The P11 used a five-shot pepperbox design, and each barrel held a 7.62x36mm dart.

Each barrel is completely sealed, and when fired, the seal is broken. All five barrels form a cluster, and clusters can be reloaded by the factory or discarded entirely in combat. The 7.62x36mm darts featured a 15-meter effective range, which outperformed the older Mk1 by a full third.

The P11 used an electric firing system with a battery located in the pistol grip of the gun. It’s a truly fascinating weapon that might still be in service with NATO frogmen today.

Related: How the Navy SEALs’ forefathers came of age in Korea

SPP-1

The SPP-1 came out of Russia and represented The Russian entry into the world of underwater firearms. This four-shot, pepperbox-style pistol fired a .18mm dart that was roughly 4.5 inches long. This big double action only pistol started its service in 1975 and apparently remains in service to this day.

The SPP-1 shows some Russian ingenuity, as the weapon is much less bulky than western variants of the underwater firearm. The SPP-1 launched darts at about 790 feet per second and had an effective range of 17 meters or so. The Russian pistol seems to outperform the Western models, but it’s tough to say since the ballistic measurements are tough to calculate underwater, and Moscow’s reputation for offering up legitimate performance data on their weapons isn’t particularly good.

Does the larger dart size of the Western P11 outperform the smaller dart of the SPP-1? Tough to say without some serious testing underwater.

Related: 3 more things movies always get wrong about a fight

APS Amphibious Rifle

The Russians didn’t stop with the SPP-1. They also wanted an underwater rifle, and the man who designed the SPP-1 would go on to design the APS Amphibious rifle as well. The APS offered a rifle-sized platform, but it’s technically not a rifle, since the barrel isn’t rifled. I guess the term long gun probably describes it best.

Regardless of nomenclature, the APS Amphibious rifle offered an effective range of 30 meters. That’s a fair bit more than the pistols offered by on either side of the Iron Curtain. Plus, the weapon used a specialized magazine that allowed the APS to hold 26 rounds of the special underwater projectiles.

The weapon fired a 5.66mm steel dart and could fire in fully automatic. The downside to a rifle like this, however, comes from its size. Its bigger, heavier design makes it harder to maneuver underwater, especially with its large and awkward magazine.

Related: Quiet Special Purpose Revolver: The tunnel rat’s lost sidearm

ADS Amphibious Rifle

The ADS Amphibious rifle is the evolution of the APS. Unlike the APS, the ADS actaully is a rifle, as it utilizes a rifled bore. The ADS came to be because the APS worked well underwater, but sucked above the surface. The options were to carry two guns (and that must’ve been a pain when dealing when swimming, dealing with all your scuba gear, and fighting) or to create a new platform that could function in either medium.

The ADS promised to do both very simply, with users having to simply swap magazines as they went from above the surface to below or vice versa. Below water, the ADS used a 5.45x39mm PSP round. Above water, the weapon uses standard 5.45x39mm ammunition. The range underwater was roughly 25 meters and the weapon offered select-fire operation.

The ADS Amphibious rifle uses a bullpup design. This mitigates length and size and makes the weapon easier to use underwater, and those benefits translate well above water as well. The ADS came to be in 2013 and shows that the Russians remained very concerned with frogmen firefights right into the 21st century.

Related: Is the service rifle of the future a bullpup?

The threat of the Underwater Firearm

The underwater firearm doesn’t necessarily kill by penetrating deeply into a guy’s chest. Sure it can, but it seems like the real advantage in frogmen firefights would be targeting gear. Ripping apart masks, breathing tubes and harnesses, protective wetsuits, helmets, and targeting the thin, often plastic windows of mini-subs are all ways these weapons could render swimmers combat ineffective with quickness and ease.

Has one of these frogmen firefights ever actually happened? If so, it’s not documented or discussed freely. However, the idea fascinates me. An underwater firearm seems a little silly these days, but they’ve clearly stuck around for quite some time, and that means the nations that operate these platforms must see a good reason.

Categories
All About Guns

The Kentucky Rifle