Texas has a proud heritage of gun ownership and Second Amendment support, so the likelihood of a vehement anti-gun candidate getting elected on a statewide basis for nearly any public office isn’t great.
Look no further than three-time loser Beto O’Rourke for proof. Running on a solidly anti-gun platform of banning AR and AK style rifles, O’Rourke lost the election for the U.S. Senate to pro-gun Sen. Ted Cruz, then failed to make it out of the primaries before the 2020 election. Finally, he lost the governor’s race to pro-gun candidate Greg Abbott in a lopsided 52% to 43% vote.
Enter Texas state Rep. James Talarico, a “pastor” who has proclaimed that God is “non-binary” and that there are really “six different genders.” While those views won’t sit well with many Texans, his views on guns and gun ownership seem to be even worse.
Talarico is vying for the U.S. Senate seat currently held by Sen. John Cornyn, who lost the Republican primary to Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. And Talarico’s thoughts on the Second Amendment should ensure that gun-rights proponents vote against Talarico this November.
In a town hall meeting in 2020, Talarico explained his reasoning on why passing more and more restrictive gun control laws is appropriate and constitutional.
“A lot of politicians like to talk about the Second Amendment,” Rep. Talarico said in the video town hall. “Very few have actually read the Second Amendment because, if they did, they would know that the words ‘well regulated’ are right there in the text of the amendment itself.”
As the National Shooting Sports Foundation pointed out in a recent news alert chronicling Talerico’s stance,
“Rep. Talarico’s suggestion that ‘well regulated’ meant that the Founders believed all along that gun rights were supposed to be heavily restricted or conditioned is as laughable as it should be disqualifying,” Larry Keane, NSSF senior vice president and general counsel, wrote in the alert.
“We have a summer reading list for Rep. Talarico, and it begins with the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Heller.”
As Keane further pointed out, in the early days of our country, “well regulated” referred to “well trained,” “well organized” or “well exercised.” Basically, the militia (of “the People”) is trained and ready to go should it be called up for duty.
Of course, that’s not Talarico’s only objectionable stance when it comes to gun owners’ rights. On a progressive podcast, he called for passage of “safe storage” laws that would mandate how citizens store their privately owned firearms—a position in direct opposition to the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Heller.
On that podcast, he equated gun control laws to the requirement for people to apply for city permits in order to hold protests and rallies on city property—a ludicrous comparison, indeed.
It was even revealed recently that Talarico employed the former head of an extremist gun control protest movement as his legislative aide in the Texas House of Representatives.
As Keane wrote, while November might seem far off, the election just a little more than 100 days away.
“As Rep. Talarico continues to try to sell his anti-gun platform to voters in Texas, more of them will learn just how extreme that platform is and will reject it,” Keane concluded. “NSSF will be there to help spread the word.”
Ultimately, while there are some decidedly liberal cities in Texas—like Austin, Houston and Dallas (think failed congresswoman Jasmine Crockett, who lost to Talarico in the Democratic Senate primary)—rank-and-file Texans are believers in the protections afforded by the Second Amendment and cast their votes accordingly. Hopefully, the vast majority will do so again and keep Talarico as far away from Washington, D.C., as possible.
The Smith & Wesson Model 57 N-Frame .41 Magnum—a favorite of sixgun superstars—refuses to go out of style.
Seldom has a new cartridge introduction been propelled by such a cast of sixgun luminaries as the .41 Magnum. Depending on whom you talk to, Elmer Keith, Bill Jordan, and Skeeter Skelton all had a hand in convincing Smith & Wesson (along with ammomakers Remington and Norma) to join forces on the .41 project back in 1963.
The Middleweight Magnum
The initial rationale for the two resulting Smith & Wesson .41 N-Frame revolvers was twofold. One, the adjustable-sight Model 57, was intended as a serious big-game revolver. The other, the Model 58, primarily envisioned by Keith and Jordan, was to be a powered-up police revolver with fixed sights.
The Model 57 was intended to use a 0.410-inch-diameter 210-grain JHP at a velocity of 1,400+ fps, while the 4.0-inch-barreled, bare-bones Model 58 (essentially an N-Frame take on a heavy-barreled, medium-frame Model 10—sort of an M&P on steroids) was to be employed with a 210-grain lead SWC at a considerably more manageable 950 to 1,000 fps in “Police Load” trim.
Photo by Michael Anschuetz. Like all current Smith & Wesson revolvers, the Model 57 Classics features a key lock to render the gun inoperable when necessary. It’s located above the cylinder release.
In addition to coming with a micro-adjustable rear sight, the Model 57 also had target-type stocks. Except for the bore diameter, it was a dead-ringer for the .44 Magnum Model 29 and could be had in several of the Model 29’s cataloged barrel lengths (4.0, 6.0, and 8.38 inches).
My well-worn 1969 Guns & Ammo Annual lists identical prices for both guns: a cool $165. As befits a sidearm intended for the LE market, the Model 58 could be had for a department-friendly $96 (blued). However, the Model 58 didn’t catch on for a couple of reasons (see the accompanying sidebar). But the Model 57 did, although primarily with discerning sportsmen (and, yes, collectors) seeking something different.
Even though Keith is reflexively associated with the .44 Magnum, he gave the new .41 Mag. Model 57 a serious big-game test, which he recounts in detail in Hell, I Was There. He took one of the first 4.0-inch specimens with him to Alaska and brought down a pair of caribou (at typically lengthy Keith yardages), and he was thoroughly impressed with the cartridge and the revolver.
One of the earliest “talking points” concerning the .41 Mag. was that it generated less recoil than the mighty .44 Mag. Of course, this proved to be a highly subjective assessment.
While the difference may be noticeable if you’re talking about the old .41 “Police Load” or Winchester’s current 175-grain Silvertip, at a full-house power level many experienced handgunners—including Jeff Cooper—claimed to be unable to see any significant difference between the two. But many .41 Mag. adherents point to the fact that—given similar bullet weights—the .41 will shed less velocity at long yardage than the .44.
Photo by Michael Anschuetz. The DA grip configuration of the Model 57 Classics transmits the recoil impulse straight back more or less.
Besides the Dirty Harry mystique, the .44 Mag.’s great advantage was that it had beaten the .41 Mag. to market by nearly a decade, and it offered an easy-shooting, easily obtainable .44 Special alternative in much the same way as .357 Magnum users can enjoy a more laid-back .38 Special option.
But the .41 Mag.—much like the 10mm Auto—has managed to gather a dedicated cult following. Enough so that Smith & Wesson has kept the Model 57 in the stable as a member of its highly regarded Classics lineup. If you want a new, blued S&W these days that’ll combine vintage appeal with performance, the company’s “Classics section” is pretty much where you’ll find it.
Photo by Michael Anschuetz. The Model 57 Classics has the original square-butt frame, unlike most current S&W revolvers that use a common K/L/N round-butt frame, but the grips are not as beefy as the original target-type grips.
What’s Old Is New Again
At first I thought the Classics line was part of the company’s Performance Center. Turns out, I was a bit off the mark. S&W’s Matt Spafford set me straight:
“The Smith & Wesson Classics line is a subset of the main Smith & Wesson line…. They do not feature the traditional Performance Center upgrades (action package, tuning, etc.) but are really fully functioning reproductions of the products that were once a part of the standard S&W line.”
The current Classics iteration of the Model 57 comes with a 6.0-inch barrel, blued finish, and the key-lock safety feature. Other departures from the original format would be the frame-mounted firing pin and the crush-fit barrel. Pinned barrels went out in 1982, along with the slightly shorter counter-bored cylinder.
The grips on today’s Model 57 Classics are different from the originals in that they are not as beefy as the target-type grips on the original, but the gun does have the true square-butt frame like the original and unlike most other current S&W revolvers that share a common K/L/N-Frame round butt.
Photo by Michael Anschuetz. Even from the big Model 57, Federal’s 250-grain CastCore hunting loads are a handful, but you can’t complain about the accuracy. Three of the shots in this 25-yard group clustered into a half-inch.
From Mild to Wild
The cross-section of .41 Mag. factory ammo I was able to dig up for the Model 57 covered the cartridge’s mild-to-wild range of performance (more or less). Loads included Speer’s 210-grain Gold Dot HP, Federal’s 250-grain CastCore, Winchester’s Supreme 240-grain Platinum Tip and Super-X 175-grain Silvertip HP, and Hornady’s new 190-grain polymer-tipped FTX. The Silvertip offering—rated at 1,250 fps—is as close as you’re going to find to “mild,” even though it’s practically a dead-ringer for the 10mm Auto Silvertip load.
So what about “wild”? Well, to me the Federal CastCore and Winchester Platinum Tip represent the top end of anything I’d want to want to run through a nice N-Frame revolver. Of course, for day-in, day-out recreational shooting, handloaders can always brew up civilized facsimiles of the original Police Load (or even something kinder and gentler). So, if you want to replicate the .44 Special’s stand-in role for the .44 Mag., this would be the way to fly.
In shooting the new Model 57, I was extremely impressed with all loads both in terms of accuracy as well as consistency. The lowest velocity extreme spread was 42 fps, and the highest was 63 fps. No shockingly spiky leaps were to be seen here.
Photo by Michael Anschuetz. The Model 57 Classics features a six-round cylinder capacity, and it utilizes S&W’s key-lock safety system located near the cylinder release.
The velocity champ was Hornady’s 190-grain FTX LEVERevolution loading. Although it obviously didn’t reach advertised carbine levels of 1,600 fps or so from the 6.0-inch barrel, it did average 1,418 fps and was quite accurate. It should be noted that felt recoil was particularly “felt”—not surprisingly—with the 250-grain Federal CastCore and 240-grain Winchester Platinum Tip. Either of these would do nicely for large hogs and bears, while everything else would certainly fit the bill for deer.
At 3.5 creep-free pounds, the Model 57’s single-action trigger pull really lived up to the crispness clichés of breaking icicles and glass rods. And should you ever envision rapid-fire double-action shooting, the pull there was a short, manageable 10 pounds with no stacking that I could discover.
Interestingly, the elevation range in point of impact for all five loads tested at 25 yards was about 4.5 inches, well within the adjustment range of the Model 57’s excellent micro-adjustable sight. So unless you lay hands on a load that’s really out of the ordinary, you’re unlikely to run out of clicks.
In the interest of full disclosure, most of my previous shooting experiences with the .41 Mag. have been with an old pre-transfer-bar Ruger Blackhawk single-action revolver. With the gun’s traditional plowshare grips, heavy loads tend to cause the gun to roll upward in recoil. Single-action fans often claim this makes recoil less onerous. I’ve found this to be true as far as it goes, provided you don’t bark your thumb on the edge of the hammer (ask me how I know this).
With an S&W N-Frame of any vintage, the gun pretty much comes straight back—which allows for quicker recovery between shots but can also pound the web of the shooter’s strong hand (which in my case gets a bit “weak” at the end of an extended session).
I’d really like a beefier set of stocks on it if I were going to do a lot of shooting—something that would cover up or help spread the impulse from that exposed steel backstrap. But again, even a 6.0-inch N-Frame is not the item for promiscuous blasting with darn near any magnum beginning with the number “4.” Or at least it isn’t for me. But this is—I admit—irrelevant whining from a cowardly .38 Special K-Frame kind of guy.
I was very impressed with the Model 57 Classics. It’s accurate, good-looking, and classy. It is a powerful tool capable of launching a large, fast projectile suitable for anything you’re going to use a magnum revolver on.
Photo by Michael Anschuetz. Still a state-of-the-art outdoorsman’s classic with vintage appeal, the .41 Magnum S&W Model 57 Classics double-action revolver boasts a retro N-Frame pedigree.
Smith & Wesson Model 57 N-Frame Specs
Manufacturer: Smith & Wesson; smith-wesson.com Type: Double-action revolver Caliber: .41 Magnum Cylinder Capacity: 6 rounds Barrel: 6.0 in. Overall Length: 11.5 in. Width: 1.70 in. Height: 6.0 in. Weight, Empty: 47.6 ounces Grips: Checkered walnut Finish: Blued Sights: Micro-adjustable white-outline rear, pinned red-ramp front Trigger: 10-lb. DA pull, 3.5-lb. SA pull (as tested) Safety: Transfer-bar firing mechanism, key-activated lock
A Patriot from the North Carolina provincial militia led by James Moore and Richard Caswell is shown in the act of firing at the Battle of Moores Creek.
illustration: Don Troiani
Shortly before the Declaration of Independence was signed, a small but pivotal battle took place near the port city of Wilmington, N.C. The February 27, 1776, Battle of Moores Creek Bridge was the first Revolutionary War battle to be fought in the Old North State. I don’t know if the popular warning against bringing a knife to a gunfight existed then, but even before the smoke had cleared that day, the Scottish Highlanders fighting for the British certainly could have vouched for the cliché’s veracity.
In late 1775, several thousand Loyalists under Brig. Gen. (of militia) Donald MacDonald assembled at Cross Creek—the site of modern-day Fayetteville, N.C. Most were recent Scottish immigrants who’d sworn allegiance to the crown, but former members of the Regulator movement were also present.
Eventually, around 1,500 Loyalists left Cross Creek and marched for Wilmington, some 95 miles away. There, they expected to meet two British seaborne forces, totaling around 7,000 troops. Accounts vary about Loyalist armament, but many—especially those carrying only broadswords from the Scottish Highlands—expected to receive proper military muskets upon meeting the British.
Patriot forces, led by Col. James Moore (no relation to the creek), began checking the Loyalists’ advances along main routes into Wilmington. Aiding Moore’s efforts was Col. James Caswell, who, according to a National Park Service (NPS) representative, led nearly 700 Minutemen from New Bern, N.C. and around 200 militia from Wilmington.
As the Loyalists closed on Wilmington, Caswell prepared to make a stand at Moores Creek Bridge. His men used natural terrain to their advantage, throwing up a breastwork on high ground, approximately 100 feet east of the bridge. According to an NPS representative, contemporary reports show that a contingent of 2nd N.C. Continentals had added two cannons to Caswell’s force, while three “brass guns” had arrived concurrent to the Minutemen.
A camp was also set up on the west side of the bridge and manned long enough for a Loyalist messenger, traveling under a flag of truce, to mistake it for the main Patriot position. That bad intelligence prompted the Scots, now led by Lt. Col. Donald McLeod, to force-march through 6 miles of cold swampland in the early morning hours of Feb. 27. Finding the camp freshly abandoned in the dawning light, they assumed the Patriots were on the run and surged forward.
As the Loyalists approached the bridge, one of their officers is reported to have yelled “King George and broadswords!” which happened to be the vanguard’s primary weaponry. The Scots soon found that the bridge’s decking had been removed and the supporting timbers greased with soap and animal fat. With Moores Creek moving swiftly and swollen to around 6 feet deep, navigating the slick beams was slow and treacherous.
Once a sizeable group of Scots was across, they were hammered by devastating fire from the muskets and cannons of Caswell’s men. Many Loyalists were killed outright, including McLeod. Others were reportedly shot off the bridge or fell, and subsequently drowned, in the strong waters.
The initial attack lasted only a few minutes, but the NPS representative told me three more assaults were beaten back—mainly by the cannons—before the Loyalists fled into the swamps. Sources vary on the number of Loyalist casualties, but somewhere between 50 and 70 were killed and wounded. Another 850 were taken prisoner in the next days, including MacDonald. Patriot forces suffered just two casualties: one combatant killed and the other wounded.
Aside from Highlander broadswords and Patriot cannons, we have scant information about weapons used during the battle. However, because this battle was early in the war and not fought by regular troops, we can reasonably assume both sides showed up with whatever arms they already possessed when called to muster.
Muzzleloading hunting rifles and fowling pieces (what would be the colonial equivalent to a modern shotgun) were likely present among each force. A contemporary report seems to support this, stating that McLeod’s body had been riddled with nine rifle balls and a couple dozen pieces of “swann shot.” The NPS representative said he’s combed through period records showing that while running away, the Loyalists threw their weapons and equipment into the swamps to aid their flight. He’s also studied firsthand accounts listing 150 broadswords, 350 fowling pieces and 1,500 “good rifles” that were mostly confiscated from Loyalist homes over succeeding days.
Moores Creek is considered to be the first decisive American victory of the Revolutionary War, providing the Patriots with a significant morale boost. It also influenced the passing, in April 1776, of North Carolina’s “Halifax Resolves” and the colony’s status as the first to instruct its delegates to vote for independence in the Continental Congress.
I’ve always held a keen interest in this battle and have visited the site several times. A hilltop where Loyalist Scots gathered while on the way to Cross Creek sits just outside my little town in central North Carolina. The same Scottish, Irish, English and German surnames found on the 18th-century land deeds, maps and headstones of our area live on in the descendants of people who fought on both sides of America’s first civil war.
I’ve called North Carolina home since I was 18 and spent 19 of my Army years stationed at Ft. Bragg. That period of my life revolved around moving quickly—often on foot—fighting light and staying one step ahead of larger enemy forces, so this is one of those battles that speaks to me on many levels. More than anything, it reinforces my deep appreciation for the sacrifices of our founding generation and the blessings of freedom.
The Battle of Moores Creek is one on a long list of evidence for the importance of well-armed citizens. It demonstrates even a modest force, competent with their arms, thinking on their feet and always ready to defend their communities, is a strong hedge against tyranny. Just as the patriots of Massachusetts had done during the battles of Lexington and Concord in April 1775, when minutes counted, the minutemen and militia of North Carolina quickly answered the call, defended their ground and altered the course of history.
