Categories
All About Guns Fieldcraft

Ayoob: How to Discreetly Carry Larger Handguns By Massad Ayoob

Traditionally, big handguns were for carrying openly and smaller handguns were for concealment because — well, duh — smaller things are easier to hide (and they’re also less weight and bulk to carry). However, the wise concealed carriers ask themselves, “Why exactly am I carrying a handgun in the first place?” The obvious answer is, “Because I might have to shoot something to stay alive.”

Springfield Armory Echelon pistol in a vehicle lock box for personal protection
The standard Springfield Armory Echelon pistol is a full-sized handgun, and it makes for an exceptional concealed carry choice. Shown is a compact 4.0C model. You just need to find the right holster and methods for optimal concealment whatever pistol you choose.

If the purpose of the gun is not only to shoot but to hit the target when it is desperately important to do so — and since we know that, as a general rule, larger handguns are easier to shoot fast and straight — we have a definite collision of needs here.

Which brings us to the question of how to comfortably and discreetly carry larger handguns concealed.

There may be other reasons. In law enforcement, the rookie cop is generally a relatively young adult, often with no firearms experience, now in an occupation where they realize they are expected to take action when violent felonies occur in their presence — even when they happen to be off-duty.

Springfield Armory Echelon pistol in an AIWB holster for personal defense
Inside-the-waistband and appendix IWB holsters can do wonders for concealing a larger pistol. Modern carry rigs are impressive with how well they can work.

While more police officers are issued compact handguns for off-duty carry today than ever before, the majority of law enforcement agencies still issue only one handgun, normally a full-size service pistol. The entry level officer is at the low end of the pay scale, often with young children and substantial life expenses, and purchasing another firearm and the attendant accessories can be a significant financial burden.

Finding the Balance

In the old days of the service revolver, young cops learned that buying an inside the waistband holster (IWB) allowed them to carry their four-inch barrel .38 or .357 Magnum concealed in ordinary clothing, and to be armed with the very same gun they were most familiar with through department training and qualification.

IWB holsters help hide big guns
IWB holsters can help hide big guns. Here, a stainless full-size Springfield 1911 is in Milt Sparks Executive Companion and a 5.25” barrel XD-M is in a Summer Surprise by Leather Arsenal. Image: Gail Pepin

Let’s fast-forward to the concealed carry world of today. Even if you are at your peak earning years and you can afford a vast array of guns of all sizes and holsters of all types, you have to balance comfort with discreet concealment and, what we’ll call for lack of a better word, shootability.

If you shoot a helluva lot better with a bigger gun, perhaps one with an optical sight or even an attached flashlight, concessions are going to have to be made somewhere.

vertical shoulder holster with Springfield Armory Range Officer 1911
Vertical shoulder holster like this classic Bianchi X15 holds full size Range Officer 1911 .45 tight to body. Image: Gail Pepin

For decades, starting at a very young age before anyone pinned a badge on me, I carried a full-size 1911 .45 auto. I did so during a few decades as an active part-time cop whenever I was allowed by the agency to do so. There were periods when I had to carry a department issue double-action .45, full size, and of course did. For some of those years the mandated service weapon was a .357 Magnum revolver with four-inch barrel. In each case, I learned to carry and be comfortable with the department issue gun on my own time.

Here’s how.

Dressing Around the Gun

If I recall correctly, Detroit Police Lieutenant and gunfight winner Evan Marshall was the first expert to coin the term “dressing around the gun.” Your clothing was designed to fit you and make you look good. Now a couple of pounds of oddly shaped metal have been added. To dress around that requires changes in sizes and styles of clothing.

full size pistol prints when bending over
The author demonstrates how a full-size 9mm pistol carried behind the hip “prints” horribly when you bend over like this. Image: Gail Pepin

IWB means that a longer handgun is down inside your pants and you don’t need as long a lower hem on your concealing garment to cover it. There’s a price to pay, though: you bought your pants with a waistband to fit you, and for them now to fit you and the pistol — and probably a spare magazine — it will have to be larger. Figure two inches larger in the waistband dimension.

AIWB. If you want a full-length grip frame to accommodate a higher cartridge capacity magazine, you’ve increased the height of the gun, a measurement that encompasses the butt of the pistol to the top of the pistol. A modern optical sight will significantly increase that height.

This is one reason why appendix inside the waistband carry (AIWB) is now so popular: most people have a broader expanse across the front of their torso than their measurement from belly button to spine. The greater height of the fully equipped modern pistol is now better concealed — but a closed front concealing garment is now required. That means an untucked closed-front shirt, a hoodie, a pullover sweater, or something similar.

avoid printing by changing how you bend over
When you crouch or kneel with your back vertical (straight up and down), you avoid the printing problems associated with a full-size gun. Image: Gail Pepin

An excellent choice is the PHLster Enigma, an ingenious system that can hide a good-size pistol under a shirt.

I’ve had occasion to carry a four-inch barrel .44 Magnum revolver. The big six-shooter concealed well in a Milt Sparks Summer Special inside the waistband holster, with a sport coat or un-tucked open front flannel shirt hiding it. Not the most comfortable carry, but certainly tolerable.

FBI tilt – butt a bit forward, muzzle canted to the rear — is a distinct concealment aid if you carry strong-side hip. It helps keep the butt inside the fabric drape coming down from the lats.

Pancakes aren’t just for breakfast. Back in the 1960’s, Roy Baker’s patented Pancake holster popularized belt loops fore and aft instead of level with the holstered pistol. It helps to pull the holstered gun’s silhouette tighter into the body for better concealment. One such loop, as on the classic Askins Avenger designed by Richard Nichols, is good; loops front and back work even better.

And for the Distaff Side

For the ladies reading this, there are separate concerns. The average female is smaller than the average male, and a four-inch barrel striker-fired 9mm her big brother considers “compact” becomes more like “huge” for her. Most of the handguns and most of the holsters were designed by and for men. Moreover, your typical female has higher and more prominent hips than a male the same height. A concealment hip holster that puts the gun’s butt in his kidney area will put the same gun up into her floating ribs.

style of this Italian made leather holster from Blackhawk ensures the butt of the gun is tucked against the torso
The design of this Blackhawk leather holster pulls the butt of the full size XD-M close to the body to maximize concealment. Image: Gail Pepin

Solution? Instead of awkwardly rocking the shoulders sideways to clear a long-barrel pistol, incorporate hip movement into the draw. If you’re right-handed, drop the hips down and left as you draw, down and right if you’re a southpaw. Now, instead of the draw being all lifting a big gun out of its scabbard, the draw becomes part that and part your lower body pulling the holster down and away from around the gun. It’s also less of a flag movement than the shoulder rock: you don’t want to “telegraph your punch” by allowing an assailant to see you drawing any sooner than he has to.

By the way, this technique also works for males who like a very high-riding hip holster.

General Tips

There are going to be fashion sacrifices. Skin-tight clothing and concealed handguns simply don’t play well together. To conceal a full-size handgun, you want the concealing garment (un-tucked polo shirt, jacket, whatever) to be about one size larger than perfect fit without the gun. That gives you enough fabric drape for better concealment. The Fashion Police will probably only give you a warning instead of dragging you into Fashion Court, but no one is likely to look at you and scream “OMG, they’ve got a gun!

shoulder holster allows for the carry of full size pistols
A high-quality shoulder holster can allow for the carry of full size pistols including the Springfield Armory 1911 line of handguns.

If you carry on the hip, don’t reach for high shelves in public with the hand on the holster side. That tends to pull up the concealing garment and reveal the pistol. Use the other arm. Bending over at the waist causes “printing” of holstered guns at hip or small of back, so pretend you’re a back patient and kneel or bend the knees to prevent the printing.

Conclusion

My old friend Clint Smith is one of the all-time great instructors in armed self-defense. He’s famous for saying, among other things, “The defensive handgun should be comforting, not necessarily comfortable.” He practices what he preaches. Every time I’ve been with him, he was carrying a full-size 1911 .45, a full-size Springfield Armory XD45, or a large frame big-bore revolver with a four-inch barrel. And, you know something? He never said the gun couldn’t be comfortable as well as comforting.

If a larger pistol gives you more confidence in your ability to hit your target rapidly under stress, and/or a greater power level that you find more reassuring, and/or a larger ammunition reservoir that you think you might need … well, that’s comforting.

Following the above advice, I’ve found that it can be comfortable, too.

Categories
Fieldcraft

Left of Bang: How Marines Avoid Ambushes By Kevin Creighton

Learn how to spot trouble long before it happens.

If you walk into any defensive-oriented training class, there will be a good chance you will hear the “Cooper Color Code” being mentioned. Created in the 1970’s by legendary firearms trainer Col. Jeff Cooper, it’s a way of describing your ability to react to what’s going on at any given moment.

Left of Bang book review
Left of Bang is based on the Combat Hunter program, which teaches Marines how to spot and avoid ambushes before they happen.

The original version has four levels, each represented by a different color.

  • White: Your mind is on vacation. You’re in your easy chair at home, reading a book and sipping a drink.
  • Yellow: You are aware of your environment and that something might happen to you.
  • Orange: There is something going on that requires your increased attention.
  • Red: You’ve determined what the problem is, and it needs to be dealt with.

When I teach a class, I relate the Color Code to driving on a road. Condition White is clueless to your environment, like texting and driving. Don’t do that. Condition Yellow means you are occasionally checking your mirrors and keeping an eye on your speed. Orange means you are approaching something that might be a problem, like a tricky intersection or a tight corner. Red means some yahoo has blown through a stop sign and you’ve got to deal with it right now. Yikes.

recognizing threats using Left of Bang book
Some threats are more obvious than others. You can learn to recognize threats using the information contained in the Left of Bang book.

The Color Code works well to describe our mindset as we go about our daily routine. It’s easy to relate to just about anybody, and describes how we need to change our response as things escalate.

However, one of the disadvantages of the Color Code is that it is an intuitive process. What triggers each step in the mindset is not specified; that is left up to the individual. Humans are pretty good at spotting trouble — that’s one of the reasons why we are at the top of the food chain. We know when things just “don’t feel right” and we prepare ourselves to deal with it.

atmospherics
When considering atmospherics, the author states that how a place “feels” is an important part of avoiding an ambush. Image: Vladvictoria/Pixabay

This becomes a problem when we are forced to explain our actions to other people, such as an investigating officer or a district attorney. “I drew my pistol because the dude was acting weird” may have seemed perfectly reasonable at the time, but try explaining that to a jury and see what they think.

What we need is an iterative, process-based approach to spotting trouble and reacting to it when it happens. Enter the Marine Corps’ Combat Hunter program.

The Right Response

The Combat Hunter program was created in 2007 as a way to teach Marines how to spot an ambush before it happens.

Casualties were mounting from surprise attacks, and Gen. James Mattis (and others) directed the Corps to create a program to spot and possibly nullify an ambush before it happened. They wanted to win the “left of bang.”

geographics
Going out for a late-night drink might not seem like a bad idea, but understand that it could increase the chances of something bad happening to you. Geography matters. Image: Juuud/Pixabay

“Bang” refers to the event that starts the ambush, be it an improvised explosive device going off or surprise assault by a group of irregular soldiers. Everything on the timeline to the left of that event is planning and preparation. Everything to the right is execution of those plans. We were winning the battle to the right of bang, what we needed was a way to win left of bang.

The Combat Hunter program was created to help solve this problem. It is, in essence, a two-step process:

  1. Establish a baseline of normal for your environment
  2. Look for changes from normal

Establishing a baseline of “normal” takes some time, but not as much as you might think. For example, I lived in Costa Rica for an extended amount of time, and it took me about three weeks to get the rhythm of the culture there, and that was before I could say more than a dozen words in Spanish.

After those three weeks went by, I had a good idea of what “normal” meant on the streets of San José, and could tell when something was not supposed to happen.

biometrics
Biometric indicators like eye twitches and nervous sweating can indicate something bad is about to happen. Image: Hinnerwaeldler/Pixabay

Just knowing that “something ain’t right” isn’t enough, though. We need to look for specific changes in our surroundings that signal that something is about to happen. The Combat Hunter program, as outlined in the book Left of Bang, demonstrates six things which can change and indicate that something bad is about to happen.

They are as follows:

  • Proxemics: Where everybody is in relationship to everyone else. A young man breaking off from a group of other young men congregating on the other side of the street and walking towards you is a prime example of this, but so is someone who is standing unusually close or unusually away from you
  • Iconography: Graffiti is a classic example of this, but it can also mean what clothes a person is wearing or similar ways we signal group affiliation to other people.
  • Geographics: Where are you? My time in college taught me that hanging around outside of a seedy bar at night dramatically increases the chances of something bad happening to you versus, say, studying in the library.
  • Kinesics: How are people moving? Touching your face, nervous glances or a “mad dog” fighting stare are usually indicators that something bad is about to happen.
  • Biometrics: Nervous tics. Unusual sweating. You know it when you see it.
  • Atmospherics: As they say in the movies, “I got a bad feeling about this.”

These are the six things that establish what “normal” behavior is like in any given environment. When three or more of those behaviors change, our behavior needs to change, or else we will suffer the consequences.

If three of these things are out of the ordinary, you need to act. What that action is will vary depending on the circumstances, but an action is required if you wish to avoid a negative outcome.

Near and Far

Up until now, I’ve been talking about how the Marines use these methods to spot trouble in far-off countries.

However, they are 100 percent applicable to our lives here in the U.S. The criminal we are most likely to face is a resource predator: We have something they want, and they are willing to use the threat of violence (or actual violence) in order to get it.

They will probably attack from ambush in order to get said resource, no matter if it is our wallet or our car or our very lives, so having a system that lets us look for specific things around us.

Better still, this process allows us to relate our thinking to others rather than just saying, “He was just acting strangely, so I drew my pistol.” Let’s walk through an example of what this might look like in real life.

It’s 10pm on a Saturday night and you have been tasked by your significant other to run to the local supermarket in order to buy a vital component for tomorrow’s meal.

Now before you say, “I would never do that sort of thing,” realize that if you haven’t done this already, you probably will do this or something similar at some point in your life. We can minimize the risks we take, but we can’t eliminate them altogether.

iconography
What we wear tells a lot about us and what our intentions might be. Image: MEHRAX/Pixabay

You pull up in your car in a reasonably safe parking spot, take a quick glance around the parking lot to make sure there is no violence currently in progress, then go into the store, make your purchases and walk out to your car.

As you exit the building, a young man breaks off from a group of other young men, ages 20-30 or so, who are hanging around a car about 15 yards off to your right. He walks purposefully towards you and is dressed primarily in green colors, along with his friends.

As he walks towards you, he points to you and says “Hey, buddy!”

Game on. Let’s establish what is going on here, and see if there is reason to act.

  • Proxemics: The man in question left his group of friends and is on a mission to approach you. That’s weird.
  • Iconography: There is a common color (green) among the people involved. Now it could be they are all on the same softball team and have stopped at this supermarket for a post-game libation, but that’s not how I would see things in this situation.
  • Kinesics: Walking with purpose, pointing at you. Yep, check that box.
  • Biometrics: Too far away to tell. Let’s give this one a pass.
  • Geographics: You’re in a supermarket parking lot, late at night, on a weekend. Yeah, geographics are definitely in play here.
  • Atmospherics: See above.

We’ve now established that there are five out of six things happening here which might indicate an ambush is about to happen. Welcome to Worst Case Scenario Town, Population: You.

What should you do in this situation? That is where your previous training and experience should kick in. If it were me, I would default to the “Ask, Tell, Make” method I learned in a Shivworks “Managing Unknown Contacts” class and ask the gentleman to hold up about 15 or so feet away from me.

proxemics
We allow people access to our personal space based on our relationships with them. Bad guys like to push these boundaries and get up close and personal. Image: Sammy-Sander/Pixabay

If he persisted on approaching, I’d ask him again to stop there. If he kept coming, I’d scream “STOP!” and go to another option such as retreating back into the store, shining a bright flashlight at him (it is night after all) or possibly deploying pepper spray or another solution. Your response may vary.

Conclusion

As we can see, the beauty of Left Of Bang and the Combat Hunter program is that they allow us to see why we did something in a logical, process-driven manner rather than just rely on intuition.

It also allows us to hone those processes and live safer lives and improves our ability to relate our actions to others if there are any possible interactions with the American legal system. Left of Bang is available in electronic, paper and audio versions from all major booksellers.

Categories
All About Guns Fieldcraft

Don’t Be this Guy | Gun Shop Don’ts

Categories
All About Guns Ammo Fieldcraft You have to be kidding, right!?!

Less is More? Taking Grizzly with a SMALLER Cartridge (30-06 vs 375 H&H)

Categories
All About Guns Fieldcraft

Picking Your Pistol: Four Mandatory Traits Of A Carry Gun by Richard A. Mann

Picking Your Pistol: Four Mandatory Traits Of A Carry Gun

Prioritizing four mandatory traits of a concealed carry handgun.

There are hundreds of pistols marketed as being suitable for concealed carry. Choosing one that might be the best option for you can seem daunting, but there’s a method you can employ that is very practical. It involves prioritizing the most important aspects of a concealed carry pistol, which include—in order of importance—carry and concealability, reliability, shootability and effectiveness.

This hierarchy might surprise many who believe effectiveness/ballistics should be most important, so let’s look at each aspect individually and some rules I think should apply.

Ease of Carry & Concealability

If you have a pistol for concealed carry that you find uncomfortable to carry or hard to conceal, you simply will not carry it—no matter how effective it might be. As they say, the first rule of participation in a gun fight is to have a gun.

Choosing A Carry Gun ruger rxm
The compact 9mm pistol has become the most popular for concealed carry because for most it offers the best balance of everything that matters.

For example, few would argue the effectiveness of a 10mm pistol, such as the 6-inch barreled Kodiak from Dan Wesson. After all, it can launch a 180-grain bullet to almost 1,300 fps with double the kinetic energy of the 9mm Luger. But it also weighs more than 50 ounces when fully loaded and is almost 10 inches long.

Choosing A Carry Gun target
This Wilson Combat SFX pistol in 9mm is soft shooting and accurate. But, fully loaded, it is heavy and may be too much gun for some to comfortably carry and conceal.

Rule 1: Find the size of pistol you can comfortably carry and easily conceal. Then, assemble your options accordingly.

Reliability

If you are required to shoot your concealed carry pistol to try to keep from becoming un-alive or seriously injured, it must work. It must work for the first shot, the second shot, and every shot thereafter. (I once responded to a shootout behind a bar early one morning and on the ground beside the dead guy was a pistol with a stove-pipe jam.)

Fortunately, most modern pistols from reputable manufacturers are very reliable, but you might discover that you do not interface with a certain pistol very well and that lack of a smooth interface can cause stoppages. You might also find out a specific pistol—no matter how trusted the model—has reliability issues.

Rule 2: Settle for no less than 100 percent reliability from your carry gun when shooting self-defense ammunition.

Shootability

You need to be able to hit what you’re shooting at. Yes, just pointing a pistol at, or shooting at, a bad guy might be enough to make them stop doing bad things. But if that does not work, you’re going to need the bullets you launch to find their mark. You might interface wonderfully well with a specific pistol, and it might never malfunction, but if you cannot hit what you’re shooting at—and you know you can shoot better—it’s not the pistol for you.

Choosing A Carry Gun wilson combat
Sub-compact pistols can be difficult to shoot fast and accurately, but a compensator like the one on this Wilson Combat P365 2.0 can help without sacrificing ease of carry and concealability.

What you’re looking for is a pistol you can shoot fast and accurately, but it’s hard to give a performance threshold when it comes to shootability, because of the different skill levels of shooters. Consider using a common defensive handgun drill—something like the Forty-Five Drill—to evaluate your abilities with any handgun you’re considering carrying.

Rule 3: If, from 5 yards, you cannot put five shots into a 5-inch circle in 5 seconds with your chosen pistol, it might very well be the wrong handgun for you.

Effectiveness

This is the aspect of defensive handguns that often causes the most worry or disagreements, and it deals with the cartridge more than the pistol. Although, the pistol matters, too, because a particular cartridge might generate a recoil impulse that makes the pistol unshootable for you. The most carried self-defense pistol cartridges are the 9mm Luger, .40 S&W and .45 Auto. Less popular are smaller pistol cartridges like the .22 LR, the .25, .32 and .380 Auto, and the semi-recently introduced .30 Super Carry.

beretta 22 pocket pistol
Itty-bitty pistols like this Beretta chambered for the .22 Long Rifle are difficult to shoot with speed and finesse, but you can hide them very comfortably.

In attempting to answer the question of which cartridge is the most effective, the answer is really very simple: It’s the cartridge that’s capable of delivering the largest caliber bullet at the fastest velocity. However, between the three most popular cartridges, and even the .30 Super Carry, the distance between their effectiveness is not as broad as you might think. Given good shot placement, they will all work about the same.

Choosing A Carry Gun sig p322
A shooter’s needs vary due to skill and hand and arm strength. Maybe for you a lightweight pistol like this Sig Sauer P322 is all you can manage.

Rule 4: Choose the largest caliber cartridge with the fastest velocity that you can comfortably manage and shoot well, in a pistol that you can carry and conceal reasonably easy.

When all these considerations are looked at in totality, the little itty-bitty guns are often avoided because they’re either hard to shoot or because they do not offer optimum effectiveness. Conversely, the big pistols are rarely chosen because they’re very hard to comfortably carry and conceal.

Today, handgun weight is a great classifying metric and the compact handguns—weighing between 24 and 32 ounces—in 9mm Luger have become the most popular. This is because for most people they offer the best balance of carry ease, shootability and effectiveness with 100 percent reliability.

This classification of pistols is where I would suggest most start their search. You might find that a compact pistol in 9mm Luger recoils a bit much for your shooting comfort. Your option then is to step up to a full-size pistol or drop down to a lesser cartridge. If you find a compact 9mm soft shooting, you could opt for a more powerful cartridge that might be more effective or for a sub-compact pistol that could be easier to carry and conceal.

Most shooters trade or upgrade their carry gun in the first few years because they’re either looking for something that fits them better or because they want a better quality or more powerful pistol. There’s nothing wrong with that.

As you learn and become a better shooter, you might go through multiple pistols before you find the one that’s just right for you. However, if you’re just beginning your search or are unhappy with your first purchase, consider these four aspects of a carry pistol and maybe try a compact 9mm, at least as a point of departure.

Categories
All About Guns Cops Fieldcraft

“Requiem for an Unsung Hero”

*Last week I was talking to my old friend Andy Stanford on the phone.  For those of you new to the shooting game, Andy was a pioneering instructor in the 1990s and 2000s.  He focused a lot of his classes on handgun skills and operating in a low light environment.

Back in the days before the internet was popular, Andy was well known in the field because he wrote books about subjects that most of us were trying to master.  I still have the original first edition copies of Andy’s books from the now-defunct Paladin Press.

Andy’s most notable book was Fight at Night, the first book ever written about low light operations.  His book Surgical Speed Shooting was also quite innovative for the time.

 

In our conversation, I mentioned that I was planning on attending an upcoming private training class taught by Larry Mudgett.  Larry spent 35 years with LAPD,  During his tenure there, he radically improved the police department’s (and the SWAT Team’s) firearms training.

He, somewhat like Andy, did the majority of his fine work in the days before YouTube, Instagram, and Facebook.  That means most Gun Culture 2.0 folks have no idea those guys even exist.

I’ve always found Andy to be both superbly intelligent and intellectually curious.  He’s a bit of a contradiction in the knuckle-dragging world of atavistic firearms instructors.  If you don’t know anything about him, I think this short article Andy Stanford: Former shooting instructor hits the high notes in the Ridgecrest, California Daily Independent characterizes a lot of his personality.

In our phone conversation, Andy told me about one of his friends whose accomplishments at Bakersfield, California PD rivaled those of Mr. Mudgett.  In fact, Andy’s friend was once Larry Mudgett’s instructor.  Unfortunately, this man, Mike Waidelich, passed away a few years ago.

I did some research on him and found that he and I would probably have gotten along quite well.  He was a student and friend of Jeff Cooper, serving as Range Master at Gunsite Academy.

In one of Cooper’s monthly Commentaries from 1995, he mentioned Mike in the following entry.

“Family member and Orange range master Mike Waidelich has now become a firm advocate of the Glock pistol. This has puzzled me because I consider that trigger action is the most significant single element in the precision efficiency of any firearm, and the trigger on the Glock is customarily so bad as to be practically unworkable.

But Mike does not agree. He explained to me that pistol engagements within the law enforcement establishment customarily occur at such short range that precise bullet placement is not important. He maintains that he can teach anybody to center a human adversary with the Glock trigger at any reasonable range – say 10 meters or less.

The other points that recommend the Glock to the police establishment are low cost and readily available modular parts. The Glock people will furnish you with spare parts immediately, where most other manufacturers hem and haw. These points are important. They are not enough to turn me into a Glockenspieler; but then, I am not a police range master.”

 

An appreciation for Glocks in the Gunsite world back in 1995 was considered heresy.  I decided I liked Mike’s style.  I liked it even more when I read his letter to the editor published by The Bakersfield Californian titled Don’t leave home without one back in 2012.

“In response to the May 2 letter “Consequences of NRA’s assault on gun laws”: I was a police officer for 30 years. I was assaulted several times during that time and had contact with many assault victims. All manner of weapons, knives, clubs, guns, and a bunch of other things were used.

I have been retired for about 14 years now and I still never leave the house without a gun. When you can assure me that I will never be attacked by anyone, armed or otherwise, I’ll leave my gun at home. Until then, you should hope that I, or someone like me, is around if you are ever the victim of an assault.

I hate violence. I hate it so much that I am willing to kill if necessary, to keep anyone from using it against me.”
 
Mike Waidelich

I fear that history may forget the genre-changing accomplishments that men like Andy Stanford and Mike Waidelich contributed.  Andy wrote an obituary of sorts documenting Mike’s achievements.  I am publishing it below with Andy’s permission to keep Mike’s ideas alive for eternity.

I think if modern day officers shot the same 10-round course Mike developed twice a month, our police hit rates would change in a dramatically favorable manner.  We’ve known how to solve the problem of cops who can’t shoot for almost 50  years now.  The problem is that most modern police firearms instructors don’t take enough interest in their craft to study the methods used by past innovators.

I hope Andy’s article provides you all with a little perspective and historical context that you might not have otherwise been exposed to.  Enjoy.  Thanks to Andy for allowing me to reprint his work.

-Greg

R.I.P. Mike Waidelich

Requiem for an Unsung Hero

 

Lyle Wyatt just called me with “bad tidings”:  Mike Waidelich died today.  I first met Mike in 1977 through the South West Pistol League, where he had won the B-class Championship the year before.

The last time I saw him was probably in the early 1990’s at the Soldier of Fortune 3-gun Match, where Waidelich was a longtime staff member.  He had Hollywood good looks, and Lyle confirms my impression that Mike was a genuinely nice guy.

R.I.P. Mike Waidelich

Requiem for an Unsung Hero

 

Lyle Wyatt just called me with “bad tidings”:  Mike Waidelich died today.  I first met Mike in 1977 through the South West Pistol League, where he had won the B-class Championship the year before. The last time I saw him was probably in the early 1990’s at the Soldier of Fortune 3-gun Match, where Waidelich was a longtime staff member.  He had Hollywood good looks, and Lyle confirms my impression that Mike was a genuinely nice guy.

Mike was born in 1942, and served in the U.S. Army Special Forces (he fought in the Dominican Republic in ’65, if I recall correctly).  One of the first Gunsite instructors, Mike taught during the API 250 class attended by LAPD SWAT icons Larry Mudgett and John Helms.  But his biggest claim to fame was the too-little-known story of his success as the Bakersfield P.D. Rangemaster.  By some miracle, I spoke with him several times in the last month or so, and got the details.

 

Mike joined the BPD in 1967 when it was an agency of 50-ish sworn personnel (now several hundred).  At that time patrol cops carried .38 revolvers in clamshell holsters.  A year or so later they had eight on-duty shootings with zero police bullets hitting the suspects.  The Chief asked Mike if he could solve this problem.  Mike said “yes” but only if he could do it his way.  A couple of hours explaining the particulars of “his way” and the job was his, 12 years total.

Pretty quickly the switch was made to 9mm Smith and Wesson Model 59 autopistols, and later, in the 1980s, to the 1911A1 Colt 45’s that Mike initially recommended (in Milt Sparks leather no less).  Then, approximately ten years after that, the department switched again, to Glocks, first in .40 S&W, now 9mm.  But the hardware is not generally the most important factor in a gunfight.  It’s usually “the nut behind the bolt,” and that is where Mike made his bones.

In-service transition training was five days long.  So was academy firearms training for recruits.  Paul Trent, Mike’s friend and protege, relates: “When I went to the Gunsite 250 course in 1980, I got an Expert ticket.  I realized Mike had taught my 1976 academy class virtually the same material, plus some additional tactics.”  Trent attended the BPD academy a year before Waidelich actually met Jeff Cooper, and prevailed in an on-duty gunfight his first day on the job.

 

The standard BPD course of fire (with Mike’s rationale) was as follows, all from the holster:

2 rounds in 1.5 seconds at 10 feet (“No one should be closer than that.”)

2 rounds in 2.0 seconds at 20 feet (“The length of a car.”)

2 reload 2 in 6.0 seconds (8.0 for revolvers) at 30 feet (“From the curb to the front door.”)

2 rounds in 3.5 seconds at 60 feet (“From the opposite curb to the front door.”)

The course was shot twice over each month (later, less frequently).

 

Mike told me the 10-point scoring zone on the silhouette target was, as best he could recall, a 7-inch circle, with the next zone (9 points) measuring 9×13 inches.  A hit anywhere else on the silhouette scored 6 points. Departmental competitions were held as additional motivation for skills development. As for the rest of the system, I’ll let his words speak for themselves (from an 11 March 2021 email):

 

“I forgot to mention the somewhat unique method for scoring the basic drills.  The time was flexible in that there were penalties for overtime.  The penalties were 1 point per quarter second over the time allowed for the string.  So, if you fired 2 in 1.5 seconds at 10 feet, you got zero penalties.  At 1.6 seconds you lost 1 point.  At 1.8 you lost 2 points, etc.  I had shooters all over the place.  One sergeant never made the time but never missed the 10 ring and his times were not long enough to disqualify him. 

Others always made the time, but were all over the target.  It was quite interesting to get them to balance the speed and accuracy appropriate for their abilities and I think it gave them a proper mind set for actual combat. 

Of course shot timers didn’t come along until 1982 so initially the timing was done to tenths of a second with a stop watch.  The course was administered with 6 shooters on the line and the RM would walk down the line and each shooter would shoot individually. 

A run through all 4 stages for 6 shooters took less than 10 minutes so the first half hour of a 2-hour training session was basic drills, followed by additional drills covering and teaching specific skills and techniques.     

Initially the standard was 80 out of 100 on either string out of 2 tries.  If a shooter failed to shoot an 80 in his first 2 attempts he was sent to a side range to dry practice and then given a 3rd attempt.  Those who failed 3 times were required to come back, but only once on department time. 

If they failed again they were required to come back on their own time.  If they couldn’t qualify during the course of the training period — monthly at first but it got longer as the department grew, finally to quarterly — they were assigned to the range for remedial training. Should they require remedial training in any two consecutive training cycles, their fitness for duty would be reevaluated.

In short, they could get fired, and nobody hit the street who wasn’t currently qualified.  The training had teeth.”

 

How good were BPD officers?  85% hits when the national average was 15%.  (Lyle says this number would be higher but for one outlier shooting in which an officer missed with his entire first magazine.)  Anyone who has studied the matter knows how significant this is.  Most cops can’t shoot well, and the few who can are usually self-motivated enthusiasts.  Not one officer was killed in a gunfight when Mike was BPD rangemaster.    A few anecdotes flesh out the tale:

The new regional FBI agents based in Bakersfield usually shot the BPD department qual for familiarization.  Mike’s course of fire quickly humbled the mostly cocky G-men.  (The Bureau actually used some of Mike’s written documentation as source material for their own efforts.)

When training in the L.A. area, Waidelich and other Bakerfield P.D. officers frequently heard comments like, “Oh. You’re from BAKERSFIELD.  Our bank robbers go there to get killed.”  Clearly the department had a widespread and well-earned reputation as real deal gunfighters.

Once, a visiting firearms instructor expressed skepticism when Mike described the BPD standards:

“You mean to tell me EVERY officer in your department passes this course?”

“Everyone from the Chief on down.”

“I’ll believe it when I see it!” 

Mike got on the radio. “Dispatch, please send two officers to the range.”  Shortly, two random BPD cops arrived, and both shot better than 90% scores, cold.  “I can call two more but the results will be the same.”

In 2016 — long after Waidelich retired — Kern County law enforcement killed more people in the line of duty than any other county in the country, many much more populous.  (Bakersfield is in west Kern County.)  I believe this statistic is the result of three factors:

1) a relatively conservative political district where cops don’t automatically get fired for using their weapons,

2) a target rich environment full of gang bangers and oilfield roughnecks, and

3) the lasting influence of Mike Waidelich’s cutting-edge training.

 

That’s my story and I’m stickin’ to it.

Categories
All About Guns Fieldcraft Interesting stuff

How To Reduce Felt Recoil From The Bench by Richard A. Mann

How To Reduce Felt Recoil From The Bench

Want to get better at handling the hard hitters? Here are six ways to reduce felt recoil from the bench.

When we shoot from a bench rest, we’re usually sighting in a rifle or testing ammunition. When doing either, it’s important to get the best shot to shot results we can. The problem is that sustained recoil can negatively impact not only your shooting but also your enjoyment. There are some ways you can mitigate felt recoil when shooting from a bench rest, and these techniques become very important when you crawl behind a hard-kicking rifle.

The general consensus among firearms trainers is that most experienced adult shooters can withstand about 20 shots from a bench rest with a .30-06 Springfield rifle without experiencing excessive discomfort or a negative impact on accuracy and precision. The amount of free recoil energy the average .30-06 rifle with a scope will generate is right at about 20 foot-pounds. Of course, some rifles recoil much harder. A .338 Winchester Magnum can generate almost twice as much free recoil energy.

But it’s not always about free recoil energy.

rifle recoil reduction

Due to the configuration of some rifles and their lack of a soft butt pad, even lighter recoiling rifles can be uncomfortable to shoot, and too, everyone has different recoil tolerance levels.

Years ago, I purchased a Marlin 1895 Cowboy lever action rifle in .45-70 Government. Based on recoil calculations, that rifle recoiled with just a tad more than 20 foot-pounds of free recoil energy.

However, because of the way the rifle was configured with its thin hard plastic butt plate, it was painful to shoot from the bench. Shooting while standing offhand wasn’t bad at all, but after four or five shots off a bench with full-power loads, your eyes would start watering.

shooting rifle off hand
Shooting a hard-kicking rifle off hand will not hurt as bad as shooting from a bench because of how you hold the rifle and how your body can rock with the recoil while standing.

If you’re going to be doing a good bit of shooting from a bench rest with a rifle that has a bit of bite, try some of these techniques to help diminish that bite. Individually they all work, but by combining them you can usually make a rifle that’s no fun at all to shoot from a bench at least tolerable enough to allow you to test several loads and/or sight it in.

1: Hold Her With Passion

As soon as a rifle fires, it will begin moving to the rear. If there is a space between the rifle’s butt pad and your shoulder, that movement and impact will enhance recoil pain. This is especially true if the rifle does not have a soft butt pad.

recoil reduction bag rest
Holding the forend of the rifle in your hand and placing your hand on the front bag can help slightly with recoil control, but wrapping the rifle strap around the front bag is a better technique.

Before you press the trigger, make sure the butt stock is snug against your shoulder—but be careful not to pull the rifle back into your shoulder forcibly. The stress of your muscles will make it more difficult to hold the rifle on target steady.

recoil reduction stock shoulder
Make sure the butt pad of the rifle has solid contact with your shoulder, but do not apply extreme force.

2: As Mom Would Say: Sit Up!

When most shooters get behind a rifle positioned on a bench rest, they tend to position the rifle as close to the bench as possible. If you do that and you’re about 6 feet tall, with most benches you will need to lean over to get low enough to place your shoulder on the rifle stock and your eye behind the sights. This position puts more of your body behind the rifle and when the rifle recoils your body will absorb—feel—more of the recoil because your body will not move easily to the rear.

recoil reduction posture sit straight
The more erect you can sit behind the rifle, the less unpleasant the felt recoil will seem.

The closer you can sit to an erect position when you shoot from a bench the less you will feel the punch on your shoulder. It more closely replicates shooting from a standing position. A gunsmith I know who builds dangerous game rifles built his test shooting bench high enough to shoot from while standing to limit felt recoil.

3: Get Yourself a Sissy Pad

One of the easiest ways to limit the pain associated with recoil when shooting from a benchrest is to use a sissy pad. These are pads you strap on your shoulder to help mitigate recoil. Caldwell and PAST offer several versions—and they do work. Your range buddies might call you a sissy and rag on you for using one … but just ignore them.

recoil pad
A recoil shield or sissy pad like this one can help reduce felt recoil.

Remember, the reason you’re shooting from a bench is to evaluate ammo or sight in your rifle, and both need to be accomplished with as much precision as possible. You don’t shoot from a bench rest to demonstrate your manhood.

4: Slings Aren’t Just For Shoulders

When I am doing a lot of shooting from the bench with a rifle that has stiff recoil, I like to take the rifle strap and loop it firmly around the top front sandbag(s). This can tremendously reduce the reward force of the rifle during recoil, because the rifle must pull against the weight of the sandbag as it moves to the rear. If you’re using a real sandbag—filled with sand—as opposed to those filled with polymer pellets, this technique works like a lead sled.

recoil reduction sling bag
By wrapping the sling around the front sandbag(s), it will effectively serve as a recoil restraint without putting undue stress on the rifle.
recoil reduction sling bag 2
recoil reduction sling bag 3

5: It’s Time to Get a Suppressor

The baffles inside a suppressor redirect and slow the gas produced when a rifle is fired. This, in conjunction with the weight a suppressor adds to the rifle, helps reduce free recoil energy, sometimes by more than 25 percent.

recoil reduction suppressor
A suppressor can substantially reduce the felt recoil of any rifle.

But when it comes to felt recoil, the reduction can seem even more. With big-bore, hard-kicking rifles, the reduction is very noticeable because big-bore rifles require big, heavy suppressors. For example, the Banish V46 V2 suppressor, which will work on 0.375- and 0.458-caliber rifles, weighs right at 1 pound.

6: It’s OK to Put on Weight

The Caldwell Lead Sled is a mechanical rifle rest that has a cradle for your rifle’s forearm and a pocket for the butt stock. It’s adjustable and holds the rifle reasonably firmly. If you add one or more bags of lead shot to the undertray, it can eliminate a lot of felt recoil. The system, however, is not perfect because you are dramatically altering the way the rifle reacts to recoil … and this can alter your point of impact.

rifle bench shooting
Recoil from rifles shot from the bench feels harder, but it is unavoidable for zeroing and testing ammo.

If you sight in your rifle with a lead sled, you should confirm your zero without it. Also, with extremely hard-recoiling rifles, the lead sled can strain the bedding of the rifle and, in some cases with extensive shooting, cause damage.

A lead sled still has application and is especially useful with new or young shooters who are very recoil sensitive, but if you properly employ the first five techniques a Lead Sled is not necessary.

Don’t Overdo It

All these techniques—individually or combined—can help you make hard kickers more tolerable to shoot. But even with these techniques, some rifles can still be uncomfortable. It’s not just the impact on your shoulder; it can be the sort of whiplash sensation applied to your neck.

safari rifle

One of the best things to do when shooting a heavy recoiling rifle is to shoot in moderation. A sustained pounding is what puts professional fighters on the canvas, and it does little to help you shoot your best.

Physics Lesson: Free Recoil Energy

recoil calculation formula

If you use the internet as a source for recoil calculation, you’ll find various calculators you can plug data into to determine the recoil velocity, recoil energy and recoil impulse of a gun. Ironically, just as two shooters will experience the felt recoil of the same gun differently, these calculators will give you different results—they’ll be close but rarely identical.

But does it matter?

Not really, because none of these calculators will tell you exactly what it feels like to shoot a specific gun with a specific load. Still, because humans are conditioned to rate or score everything by numbers, we want a numerical answer to everything including how hard a gun will kick.

The Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers’ Institute (SAAMI) sets the specifications manufacturers follow when they make guns and ammo and is a great source for free recoil energy information.

According to SAAMI, the momentum of a free-recoiling firearm is equal and opposite in direction to the momentum of the bullet (or shot charge/slug and wad column) and the propellant gases. Because propellant gases are extremely difficult to weigh, SAAMI equates the propellant gas weight to the powder charge weight.

But SAAMI tempers the velocity of the propellent gases based on gun type. The way the different calculators express the velocity of propellent gases is one reason you’ll see different results from different formulas.

According to SAAMI, the formula for determining the free recoil energy (FRE) of a firearm can be expressed as:

FRE = WF/(2×32.17) ((WEVE + WPCVEf)/(7000 x WF))2

where:

WF = weight of firearms in pounds

WE = weight (in grains of the ejecta—bullet or shot and wad column)

VE = velocity of the ejecta in feet per second

WPC = weight of projectile charge in grains

7000 = conversion factor for grains to pounds

VEƒ = velocity of the propellant gases (VE) multiplied by gun factor (ƒ)

where the value of ƒ =:

High Powered Rifle – 1.75VE

Shotguns (average length)  – 1.50VE

Shotguns (long barrel)  – 1.25VE

Pistols & revolvers  – 1.50VE

Given this formula, a 7-pound high-powered rifle firing a 165-grain bullet with a powder charge weight of 40 grains at a muzzle velocity of 2,700 fps would have 18.26 foot-pounds of free recoil energy (FRE):

WF           WE.      VE       WPC  VE        ƒ            WF.          FRE

7/(2×32.17) ((165*2700+40*(2700*1.75)/(7000*7))2=18.26 foot/pounds

I plugged this same data into three online recoil calculators, and the results were: 18.19, 18.2, 18.88, for an average of 18.42 foot-pounds for free recoil energy. You can take the time to work the formula, but that time will be mostly a waste because we’re all going to experience recoil force differently … at least by as much as the varied results provided by online calculators.

Categories
Fieldcraft Manly Stuff Our Great Kids Real men This great Nation & Its People War

William Fairbairn, Rex Applegate, the OSS and the ‘House of Horrors’

Categories
Fieldcraft

Freezing to Death By Will Dabbs, MD

What’s it really like to die? Well, nobody actually knows. There are those who claim to have died and then come back to life, but that’s not technically accurate. Some of the support structure might have failed only to be kickstarted later, but that vital essence is either there or it is not.

Even this deep into the Information Age, death remains maddeningly enigmatic. As a physician, it has fallen to me to pronounce quite a few people dead. I’ll grant you a little insight into the sausage factory that is modern medicine. We still don’t much know what that practically means.

Life is a curious inscrutable spark. Biology opines that life begats life. All living things must spawn from something previously alive. Mary Shelley’s vivid imagination notwithstanding, we can’t make it de novo. We can only identify when it is gone.

In a manner of speaking, death is simply the absence of life. The sundry machinations involved in declaring someone dead—auscultating for breath and cardiac sounds, assessing pupillary and corneal reflexes, stuff like that—are all designed to assess whether or not that vital ember has actually been extinguished. Like most things, that can be a curiously inexact science.

Baby, It’s Cold Outside …

I was stationed in the Alaskan interior as a soldier. Mine was an arctic combat unit, so the winter was our primary training time. This close to the Arctic Circle it was dark even at midday. It was also just insanely cold.

That’s not hyperbole. The thermometer flirted with 50 degrees below zero. Under those conditions, the world just gets a little bit weird. There is typically no wind and no precipitation. It is as though nature just gives up and quits.

Digs

Uncle Sam has ample experience in such unforgiving spaces. Arctic tents will accommodate 10 troops arrayed like the spokes of a wagon wheel radiating out from a center pole. Each tent sports a Yukon stove that runs off of most any flammable liquid.

This day we were using JP8 jet fuel, a greasy, diesel-like concoction that is actually a bit challenging to conflagrate. The stove fed from an inverted five-gallon jerry can that sat outside on a stand. Once nicely tooled up, a Yukon stove creates the most mesmerizing sound.

In sleep mode, you lower the canvas tent down to help retain as much heat as possible. One poor schmuck has to stay awake and act as fire guard. The year before I got there, one of these tents caught fire and killed 10 GIs. The fire guard job is important.

What any normal person really dreads is having to change out the jerry can. Five gallons of fuel lasts a while. However, once the stove runs dry, that canvas tent gets cold fast. The fire guard has to traipse outside, wrestle a fresh can in place, and then restart the stove. That sucked. Nobody wanted to be that guy.

Life Goes Pear-Shaped

We were all nestled snugly in our arctic sleeping bags, but there is just so much insulation you can get out of those rascals. I have indeed slept exposed in one of those things under such frigid conditions. It will keep you from dying, but you’ll never be comfortable.

Sleep deprivation is part and parcel for an Army officer in the field. I had been up for a couple of days already and finally crawled into my fart sack with maybe three hours to go until it was time to get up and do it all over again.

Soon after I fell asleep, the stove ran out of gas. As it was close to time to get up anyway, the fire guard just woke everyone, myself included, and cleared everybody else out. Exhausted, I promptly fell asleep again.

Some while later I awoke to find myself alone and cold-soaked. In the absence of the stove, the ambient temperature had dropped to 50 below zero in no time. I was shivering uncontrollably and badly hypothermic. My boots, parka, and gear were outside my sleeping bag. Expeditiously donning that stuff didn’t make things much better.

Dying is Not So Bad

It was maybe 75 meters to the TOC (Tactical Operations Center) where it was always warm. I gathered up my kit and my weapon and stumbled in that general direction. About halfway there, I started to feel REALLY good.

Before one dies of hypothermia, they develop the weirdest sense of euphoria. Folks who succumb to cold are often found naked having inexplicably removed their clothes.

In my case I just wanted to sit down at the base of a tree and rest. I figured just a few minutes should be enough to leave me rejuvenated. After some fuzzy mental gymnastics I nonetheless inexplicably decided to crack on.

By the time I staggered into the TOC, I didn’t know or care who or where I was. My buddies recognized my sordid state and set me up in front of the stove with something hot to drink.

Fifteen minutes later I was back in the land of the living. By definition, nobody knows what it is really like to die. I can tell you from experience, however, that in the cold arctic wastes death can be positively seductive.

Categories
Fieldcraft

9 Home Invasion Stereotypes