Categories
Born again Cynic!

How Big Tech Killed Local News and Targeted our Second Amendment Freedoms by Scott Witner

How Big Tech Killed Local News

Here’s something the mainstream media won’t tell you about the mainstream media: its anti-gun bias isn’t just ideological. It’s structural. And it was built by Silicon Valley’s ad machine, not by a shadowy cabal of editorial writers sitting around plotting your disarmament.

The Numbers Don’t Lie

In 2000, newspapers accounted for roughly 53 percent of U.S. ad spending. By 2020, that number had collapsed to about 5 percent, according to the Congressional Research Service. The revenue didn’t disappear — it moved to Google, Meta, Amazon, and TikTok.

The fallout was immediate and severe. More than a third of U.S. newspapers operating in the mid-2000s are no longer in operation. Newsroom employment dropped by about 26 percent between 2008 and 2020 — roughly 30,000 jobs. Newspaper newsrooms alone shrank by 57 percent.

Few industries have seen that kind of collapse outside of video rental stores or one-hour photo shops.

The Local Press Was the Counterweight

Local newspapers were never flashy, but they mattered. They balanced the national narrative coming out of outlets like the New York Times, Washington Post, and Los Angeles Times. A paper in rural Ohio or central Texas was written by people familiar with firearms — people who hunted, carried, or grew up around guns.

As those papers disappeared, so did that viewpoint. What replaced it was national wire coverage from AP and Reuters, filtered through editorial frameworks that often treat common firearms as anomalies or threats.

Local journalism functioned as a decentralizing force, the media equivalent of federalism. It kept coverage grounded in reality. That check is largely gone.

Who’s Left in the Newsroom

What replaced it? Centralized newsrooms staffed by people who are statistically less likely to have ever held a firearm, let alone owned one. These newsrooms look to the Times as their style guide on everything from grammar to gun politics. They want to be in the cool crowd. And the cool crowd, as any gun owner can tell you, thinks you’re a problem to be solved.

The irony is that even the big coastal papers are showing some cracks. The Times, the Post, and the LA Times have all recently parted ways with their most stridently anti-gun opinion editors — not out of any sudden respect for the Second Amendment, but because the political winds shifted with the 2024 election cycle and they didn’t want to look completely out of touch.

They haven’t hired pro-gun replacements. But a few almost-moderate takes on firearms have squeaked through lately, which by recent standards counts as progress.

The Ecosystem has Shifted

The media ecosystem hasn’t disappeared — it’s reorganized. Independent outlets, podcasts, and subscription platforms have filled part of the void.

Pro-Second Amendment voices have more direct access to audiences than they did two decades ago.

But the broader landscape is more segmented. Media alignment now mirrors political alignment. The middle ground that once existed — including pro-gun Democrats and regionally diverse newsroom perspectives — has narrowed significantly.

Bottom Line

The mainstream media’s hostility toward the Second Amendment isn’t just about bias. It’s about who survived the economic apocalypse that Big Tech brought down on local journalism, and who didn’t.

The people still shaping the narrative are, in many cases, far removed from the communities and culture they’re covering.

Categories
Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" Born again Cynic! Cops

TSA Was Never Really About Your Safety…

Categories
Born again Cynic! Cops

A Law to Jail Bad Politicians? – Washington Gun Law

Categories
Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" Born again Cynic! Cops

Don’t Abuse the Word ‘Protester’ By Rich Lowry

A gun shot perforation in a window pane can be seen in front of a makeshift memorial for Alex Pretti in Minneapolis, Minn., January 26, 2026.(Roberto Schmidt/AFP via Getty Images)
That’s not what Alex Pretti was.

Alex Pretti wasn’t killed while “protesting.”

This is the most common description of what he was doing on that Minneapolis street last weekend when he got in a confrontation with federal immigration agents that ended in his tragic shooting.

But if Pretti was merely a protester, we need to change the definition.

A protester, as typically understood, is someone who is making a point, often as part of a gathering of other like-minded people and, usually but not always, in opposition to something.

A protester might hold a sign outside a coal-fired power plant calling for it to shut down.

He might go to Union Square Park in New York City to hear speeches from bullhorns whenever something happens that outrages the left.

He might march against the Iraq War, or the Vietnam War — or in favor of Hamas.

This kind of activity is not to everyone’s taste — personally, I hate the drums and the chants — but there is no doubt that it is a legitimate form of political advocacy.

Depending on the cause, it can even be admirable.

What we are seeing in Minneapolis, though, is often quite different. Run-of-the-mill protesters don’t seek out federal agents and harass and obstruct them. They don’t follow and block their vehicles or establish a robust communications network to deploy resources creating maximum disruption of their operations.

We all are very familiar with how clashes between protesters and police usually go: A contingent of cops faces an unruly crowd along a skirmish line, and the advance guard of the crowd gets more and more aggressive, or the cops begin to move in to disperse the crowd. One way or the other, mayhem ensues. We’ve all seen it hundreds of times.

This is different. Opponents of ICE are, in an organized effort, tracking agents and showing up at operations to stop them from doing their job or make it as difficult as possible. This is more a form of low-level, (by and large) nonviolent insurgency than conventional protest.

And Pretti was part of this effort. It’s more accurate to describe him as an agitator, or — depending on the level of his involvement in the ICE network — even as an operator, than a protester.

The point is to influence events, by direct involvement, rather than simply observe or protest them.

It is telling that, according to CNN, Pretti was injured in a prior confrontation with ICE agents a week before his death.

The fact of the matter is that if Pretti had indeed been only protesting last weekend, he’d still be alive today. He would have stayed on the sidewalk and held up a sign, or chanted “ICE go home,” and the officers might have been annoyed, but they presumably wouldn’t have interacted with him, and there wouldn’t have been any encounter with the potential to go catastrophically wrong.

The calculation in Minneapolis has been that this kind of benign activity is less effective than direct action, and unfortunately — with public opinion swinging against Operation Metro Surge and Trump apparently looking for a climb-down — this assessment looks to be accurate.

We can disagree about the desirability of the goal that Pretti was pursuing, but there’s no doubt about how he was pursuing it, and it wasn’t through conventional protest.

 

Categories
Born again Cynic!

How Many Minnesota Leaders Could Go to Prison?

Categories
All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" Born again Cynic! Gun Fearing Wussies

More Restrictions: Democrat Reps. Push Bill to Limit Online Ammo Sales by AWR Hawkins

Reps. Kweisi Mfume (D-MD) and Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-NJ) announced Friday their re-introduction of legislation to limit the online sale of ammunition.

press release from Mfume’s office indicates the bill, called the Stop Online Ammunition Sales Act, “would require federally licensed ammunition dealers to confirm the identity of individuals who arrange to purchase ammunition over the internet by verifying a photo I.D. in person.”

The legislation would “also require ammunition vendors to report any sales of more than 1,000 rounds within five consecutive days to the U.S. Attorney General, if the person purchasing ammunition is not a licensed dealer.”

Rep. Mfume commented on the legislation, saying, “Since we last introduced this bill, the crisis of mass shootings has continued unabated. We’ve been living with this scourge of violence for so many years as assault weapons and enormous amounts of ammunition continue to fall into the hands of diabolical people.”

He added, “Mass shootings are not going to stop on their own, and we cannot keep waiting for the next one to occur.”

Rep. Coleman said:

Regulating online ammunition sales is a commonsense step to countering the number of mass shootings we see every year.

 

This legislation closes the loophole that makes tragedies like these so unfortunately common. Public safety must come before convenience for an unregulated market: Americans send us to Washington because it is our job to protect them, not mourn them.

The online ammo sales gun control bill has 17 co-sponsors.

Categories
Ammo Born again Cynic! Paint me surprised by this You have to be kidding, right!?!

Winchester’s New Long-Range Hunting Bullet: Real Breakthrough or Just Marketing?

OR as grumpy , old & very cynical me is thinking. The Gun Makers want to sell some more guns. So they invent this new round that will do everything but go around corners, never miss, clean it and then cook it.

Sorry folks but as the late Master Gunner Ian Hogg said a very long time ago. We have taken small arms ammo as far as it can go . So stick with the classics and you really cannot go too far! Grumpy

Categories
Born again Cynic! California

My so called Leaders of California

Categories
All About Guns Born again Cynic! Paint me surprised by this

Guns Dealers Can’t Sell (January 2026) | It’s Getting Worse RIGHT NOW

Categories
All About Guns Born again Cynic!

Gun Makers Send “SPECIAL” Guns to Reviewers?