Categories
A Victory! Allies

Carjacker Kills Himself With Shotgun As He Attempts To Break Window By Tom Knighton

Carjacker Kills Himself With Shotgun As He Attempts To Break Window

Carjackings have to be terrifying for the victims. You’re sitting there, minding your own business, when all of a sudden an armed individual shows up and steals your car out of nowhere. The sudden, terrifying nature of such an attack has got to rattle you.

Advertisement

However, carjackers aren’t necessarily a particularly bright bunch. After all, it doesn’t take a master criminal to stick a gun in someone’s face and take their car. This isn’t Gone In 60 Seconds we’re talking about here.

No, it’s a violent assault on an individual with the potential for the shedding of innocent blood.

Which is why it’s absolutely hilarious when the problem sort of takes care of itself.

A carjacker died after he accidentally blasted himself in the chest while trying to smash a window with the butt of his shotgun, an inquest has heard.

Officers investigating the death of Reece Ramsey-Johnson said they were satisfied there was ‘no third party involvement’ as they closed the probe into his killing.

Witnesses who saw the 22-year-old dying from gunshot wounds in the street outside a Lloyds bank in Sydenham on Sunday, September 8, said his own gun may have gone off when he used to to hit a car window.

Opening the inquest at Southwark Coroner’s Court on Thursday September 26, Dr Andrew Harris confirmed the police investigation had now ended.

He said: ‘The investigating officer is satisfied there is no third party involvement.

Now, this was a UK carjacker and not the American variety of the breed, but it’s still the feel-good story of the day, that’s for sure.

It also suggests that British gun control laws aren’t nearly as effective as some want to claim them to be. After all, if someone like this snotnosed punk could get a shotgun, they can’t be all that hard to obtain on the black market that I’ve been assured doesn’t really exist in the UK.

Advertisement

To be sure, Ramsey-Johnson got precisely what he deserved, regardless of where he was located. Such criminals should always meet such ends. At least here in the United States, we can arrange for them to meet those ends. In the UK, you have to hope and pray it’s someone of Ramsey-Johnson’s…intellect. That’s what it takes to make sure predatory jackwagons get precisely what they deserve.

Honestly, though, I’m actually a bit baffled at just how stupid you have to be to shoot yourself in the chest while trying to bust a car window. I get that they don’t have the gun culture we do, but it shouldn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that you don’t point your gun at yourself while you smash the firearm against a window. This is especially true if there’s something like a finger on the trigger.

At this point, Ramsey-Johnson’s death isn’t just a feel-good story, but a prime example of nature adding a little chlorine into the gene pool. My only hope is that this jackwagon hadn’t already reproduced and thus spread his idiocy to a whole new generation.

Categories
All About Guns Allies

Unarmed and Defenseless Israeli Citizens Massacred! By Will Dabbs

Israel: Draconian Gun Control in a Country in Desperate Need of a 2nd Amendment.

East Jerusalem, Palestinian Territories. Israeli soldiers look at Jerusalem’s Old City on June 2, 2012. Annexed by Israel, internationally it is still considered occupied Palestinian territory. (Shutterstock/ Ryan Rodrick Beiler)

Editor’s Note: This article ran in the spring of 2022. Firearms News is currently working on a new report regarding reports of Israel issuing emergency gun licenses.


On March 22, 2022, Islamic State supporter Mohammad Abu al-Kiyan stabbed a woman to death at a gas station in Beersheba, Israel. He then proceeded to run down and kill a Chabad rabbi who was riding a bicycle. Al-Kiyan subsequently stabbed another two Israelis to death before being gunned down. Five days later a pair of ISIS gunmen opened fire at a bus stop in Hadera, Israel, killing two and wounding another dozen. Two days after that a 26-year-old Palestinian named Diaa Hamarsheh infiltrated Brnei Brak, Israel, and began firing from his car. His five victims included a 29-year-old rabbi who had been pushing his two-year-old son in a baby carriage.

On April 7, 2022, a 28-year-old Palestinian named Raad Hazem opened fire on a crowd in Tel Aviv, Israel. He ultimately killed three Israelis and wounded six. Around 1,000 soldiers and police officers were mobilized in response. Hazem took refuge in a nearby mosque and was later killed in a gunfight with Shin Bet agents. These are just a few examples. There have been many more. With each outburst of violence there is celebration in Palestinian-held territories and veneration of the perpetrators as martyrs. In response, Israeli security services crack down, and the cycle of violence escalates. The innocent are most frequently the victims.

Recent Events

israel-hamas-war-2023-02

When Dabbs was there last guns were most everywhere in Israel, but not many in civilian hands.

This was a demoralizing article to research. I was last in Israel several years ago. I left enraptured with the place. Most Israelis are military veterans, and there was a sense of civic responsibility that eclipsed anything we enjoy over on this side of the pond. Every square meter of the country seemed to be cultivated or put to some similar good use. Everything seemed clean and tidy. The Israeli people were independent, industrious, and friendly. I was struck by the prevalence of firearms. Back then IDF (Israel Defense Force) soldiers frequently brought their service weapons home and carried them in public. I saw young studs in civilian clothes out on dates with their girlfriends while packing Tavors, M4’s, and Mekut’zrar carbines. Israelis also seemed enamored with dummy cords. You could tell who was packing handguns in a crowd by the little curly cords that snaked out from underneath their shirts. All the greeters at hotels and museums were armed.

×

There was a reason for all those guns. Folks have been fighting over that remarkable scrap of dirt since the literal dawn of humanity. However, in recent years it appears Israel has become infected with the same socialist ideals that seem to drive most modern nation states. I asked one 72-year-old Israeli back then about the rules for owning a weapon. He said that you had to get a permit from the government and show a need, but he claimed none of that was terribly difficult. His job as a tour guide was adequate to land him a 9mm Jericho pistol. However, at some point between then and now something changed. As I type these words, Ukraine is in an existential fight for survival. When times were darkest the Ukrainian government was freely distributing assault rifles to anyone who could show an ID and sign up for their territorial defense forces (TDF). However, as soon as they caught their breath, the Ukrainian government began quietly retrieving military-issued weapons from private citizens in the TDF.

israel-hamas-war-2023-03

The M4, the Tavor X95, and the Mekut’zrar were the most common infantry weapons Dabbs encountered during his travels in Israel several years ago.

There has likewise been a gradual creeping effort in Israel to deprive private citizens of the tools they need to defend themselves in the face of rampant terrorism. In a nation comprised almost entirely of military veterans, it has become suffocatingly difficult to obtain a firearm for personal defense. If ever there was a place and a time when private citizens needed to be armed it is there and now, yet the Israeli government nonetheless discourages its citizens from being prepared. Private companies requiring weapons to do business must be extensively licensed, and transportation requirements are oppressive. Police approval is required to transport company weapons both to and from the range. Guns may only be moved in an approved vehicle. Weapons must be religiously logged in and out. Of the 195 sovereign nations in the world, only four include constitutional protections for the right to bear arms. Of those three, Mexico and Guatemala clearly don’t take it seriously. Only the United States and the Czech Republic actually treat the individual right to keep and bear arms with the respect it’s due. The experience of our Israeli friends should serve as a cautionary tale to any American who might question whether or not the 2nd Amendment requires defending.

Origin Story

israel-hamas-war-2023-04

Among those who can secure a permit the Glock is the most common defensive handgun in Israel. The M1 carbine was foundational to Israel’s struggle for independence. These old rifles have long since been sold overseas as surplus. The Uzi submachine gun played a huge role in ensuring the survival of the Israeli state. The Uzi filled a need for a domestically-produced infantry weapon that was both reliable and available.

The modern state of Israel came into being on May 14, 1948, in the bloody wake of the Holocaust. The following day the five surrounding nations of Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Egypt, and Jordan invaded. Israel has been fighting for its very survival ever since. Several geopolitical areas remain at the heart of this ongoing conflict.

The Al Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem is the third-holiest site in Islam and rests atop the Temple Mount, the most venerated scrap of dirt in Judaism. The Gaza Strip is a modest 141-square-mile piece of land governed by the Palestinians that rests between Israel and Egypt. The West Bank is a disputed territory separating Israel from Jordan. The Golan Heights is a rocky plateau wrested from the Syrians in 1967. Each of these spaces is a nidus for conflict today.

Violence has been an simmering constant since 1948, but there have been several full-blown wars. The Suez Crisis of 1956 pitted Britain, France, and Israel against the Egyptians. The Six Day War in 1967 saw Israel seize Jerusalem, Gaza, the Sinai, the West Bank, and the Golan Heights. Israel eventually returned the Sinai to Egypt following negotiations 12 years later.

The subsequent 1973 Yom Kippur War, though bloody, was not nearly so transformative. The 1982 Lebanon War and the several Palestinian Intifadas that followed spilt a river of blood. Today violence taints most everything in the Holy Land. I stood on the back balcony of my hotel holding my daughter’s hand and watched the rockets rising out of Gaza. We Americans have a great deal for which to be grateful.

Boots on the Ground

I reached out to Howard Linnett, a friend who has lived in Israel for decades, with a series of questions. Howard is uniquely qualified to comment on the current state of affairs.

——————————————————————————–

 

Dr. Will Dabbs: What’s your story?

Howard Linnett: I was born and bred in a working class factory town in Connecticut in the days when Connecticut was a firearms manufacturing dynamo. I was awarded my Eagle Scout rank in 1964. College took me away from home. Not too long after the Six Day War, I did my junior year abroad as a foreign student at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem. There I met a beautiful Israeli sergeant still doing reserve duty. We married a year later. My roots have been deep in Israel ever since.

WD: What is your military history?

HL: I was drafted into the Israeli Army in the late ‘70s. Platoon Honor Graduate, Combat Engineers. Learned to build. And learned to destroy. Explosives are fun!

WD: There has been a recent uptick in violence by disaffected Palestinians. What is your view on this from your intimate vantage?

HL: Terrorism never stops. From kindergarten, Arab children are taught Israel must be destroyed. If a Palestinian commits a terror attack and is caught and sentenced to jail, she or he is idolized and receives a salary from the Palestinian Authority. If killed in the attack, the terrorist’s family receives a monthly stipend. “Pay-for-Slay” allows any disaffected Israeli or Palestinian Arab a perfect way to end their life.

WD: PM Bennett has called upon Israeli citizens who are authorized to carry concealed weapons to do so. Does there seem to be a fresh push to increase the number of armed Israelis in the general population?

HL: When terror is everywhere and constant, several thousand or more folks file applications for a license to purchase and possess a handgun. Then the issuing authority (the police) s-l-o-w-l-y processes the application. Permits are not easily obtained. One must “qualify” and self-defense is not one of the few reasons for which a permit is granted.

Any notion to increase the number of handguns licensed to civilians is purely cosmetic and entirely fleeting. The number of licenses decreases every year by perhaps 10,000. When the population is scared and the police hopeless and hapless, the powers-that-be call for licensed gun owners, licensed “to carry,” to do so.

The politicians also mouth-off about easing the requirements to qualify for a firearms license. The crisis is over before any changes can be legislated. Thus ends any meaningful regulatory change. Licenses for rifles and shotguns are virtually non-existent.

WD: What seemed to be the feelings of the last three or four prime ministers on gun ownership?

HL: Prime Ministers don’t really get involved in gun issues.

WD: How difficult is it to own a firearm as a private citizen in Israel?

HL: Close to impossible.

WD: What is involved in legally carrying a concealed weapon?

HL: One’s permit to possess a handgun must be for self-defense based upon a government determination that where you live or where you travel is dangerous and you need the means to defend yourself.

WD: When I was in Israel, I was struck by the number of young soldiers out in public in civilian clothes who were packing their service rifles. What are the rules concerning this practice?

HL: Nowadays soldiers are, for the most part, no longer allowed to take their rifle home with them. Theft of rifles from soldiers’ homes is a huge problem. Civilians who live in communities in “dangerous” locations may be issued a rifle by the IDF, especially if the individual is a member of her or his community’s ERT. These folks come and go from home with the rifle as a matter of self-defense.

WD: What sorts of weapons can be privately held in Israel?

HL: One handgun, if you qualify. Glocks are the most prevalent. If you are an IPSC “active shooter” (participate in a minimum of five national competitions a year) you may be granted a license for a second handgun. Only about 100 of us have rifles, grandfathered from our days as volunteer police precision marksmen and women.

We are now members of the Israeli Rifleman Association. Last time I asked, there remained the requirement that one must be an “active” shooter (participate in a minimum of five national competitions a year) for three years before being able to apply for a license to purchase and possess a rifle. The Rifleman Association and the Israeli Shooting Federation must recommend one for a rifle license and endorse one’s application in writing. Then it is lots of luck.

Only active shooters can apply for a Israeli Shooting Federation recommendation to purchase ammunition. Otherwise one is limited to a box of 50 rounds. If you want to practice at a range, you purchase what you are going to fire for that practice session. One cannot buy more ammunition than you shoot then and there.

WD: Is there a gun culture in Israel?

HL: There are less than 180,000 licenses for approximately eight million citizens. Except during times of heightened terrorism anyone who would possess a firearm without being compelled to do so because of their job (soldier, police officer, etc.) is viewed by the general public as simply being mentally defective. Those same people are the first ones to ask that you sit next to them, if they know you are armed, when you get on Jerusalem’s Lite Rail.

WD: Is there an anti-gun political lobby in Israel?

HL: YES. It is called the Government. It is scared of armed folks.

WD: It seems the Israeli gun lobby cannot get traction due to a liberal/socialist leaning population. Is there an effective pro-gun political lobby in Israel?

HL: No movement of Israeli gun owners exists. Politics rule. Citizens don’t.

WD: How much of the population seems socialist/leftist and do you feel that this is where the opposition to gun ownership is birthed?

HL: Much of the opposition to gun ownership comes from the various women’s movements. They point to deaths of women from firearms. Otherwise opposition against private ownership of firearms goes back to the founding of Israel. If memory serves me, the second law passed by the Israeli Legislature (1949) was confiscation of all firearms and munitions.

WD: Do Israelis appreciate that, historically speaking, disarmament of the civilian population has led to genocide?

HL: Israelis rely on the IDF.

WD: The M1 carbine was once common in Israel. Are weapons donated by the United States still in use?

HL: The IDF is transitioning to the M16/M4 with a shorter barrel and flattop upper. Those M1 carbines were collected and sold as surplus to foreign purchasers.

WD: How does mandatory military service flavor Israeli culture and society?

HL: Military service is not really universal. For example, ultraorthodox constitute a group of citizens whose participation in the IDF is mostly voluntary. Those who choose to serve are often scorned and banished by their community. Theoretically, Israel has a combat experienced reserve of men and women. Our reserves provide a quiet sense of added security.

WD: Israel is a melting pot of cultures dating back millennia. What are your observations on the engines behind the ongoing violence?

HL: Violence is getting worse. Iran’s people lack clean drinking water, but Iran is the financer of 90% of the terror in the Middle East. Israelis are seen as the latest Crusaders who must be driven into the sea. Convert or die by the sword is alive and well. An all-out Middle Eastern war is inevitable and may spread. We shall see who is the last man standing.

Obtaining a Gun in Israel

A firearms license in Israel is a privilege, not a right. This simple observation fundamentally changes the calculus of personal defense in that country. Additionally, in recent years the government has been actively reducing the number of private firearms held by Israeli citizens. Israeli gun licenses must be renewed every three years.

Applicants must meet a series of preconditions along with at least one eligibility requirement. Applicants must be at least 18 if they have served in the IDF and 27 if they have not. They must be fluent in Hebrew and have spent at least the previous three years in the country. The application for the license must include a health assessment and declaration performed by a physician along with a certifying letter of residence obtained from the local government council. Applicants must also pass both written and practical shooting examinations along with an in-person interview. Denial is subjective and difficult to appeal. Recognized eligibility for a gun license includes certain professions such as security guard, explosives transport, or shooting instructor. One criterion involves those who live or work beyond the Green Line in the West Bank where the threat of terrorism is omnipresent. There are 18 possible eligibility criteria.

Per the Israeli government website, “Once the application is submitted and recorded in the system, it will be forwarded for authorization by the Israel police and the Ministry of Health. After their authorizations are received, you will be contacted by the Firearm Licensing Information and Service Center to schedule an interview at one of the licensing offices, in order to continue the process.” Processing time is at the whim of the government, and any license holder who finds themselves no longer meeting eligibility criteria must surrender their firearm at a police station within 72 hours.

The US Perspective

israel-hamas-war-2023-07

Yonatan Stern is the director of the Cherev Gidon Israeli Tactical Training Academy. Cherev Gidon instructors are Israeli combat veterans living in the US whose mission it is to provide high quality Israeli tactical shooting skills to American civilians. We reached out to Yonatan for his perspective: “This is a topic I am intimately familiar with. I moved out of Israel specifically because of its Bolshevik gun controls that denied me any right to defend myself or my family against heavily armed terrorists. I know first-hand how dangerous and deadly this terrible situation is.

“It does not look like any progress is being made in Israel in regards to access to firearms for average citizens. Prime Minister Naftali Bennet recently made a statement encouraging armed citizens to carry their weapons in public, but this was more of a cynical publicity stunt than any indication of progress regarding gun rights. Only a tiny fraction of the civilian population is licensed to own a firearm, and he has made no efforts whatsoever to enable greater access to firearms for average civilians. Deadly terror attacks against the civilian population are becoming a daily occurrence, yet the Israeli government enforces some of the most extreme gun control measures in the world, completely denying citizens the right to bear arms.

“Many of these terror attacks could easily be stopped if the civilian population was armed. However, in Israel, only police, military, security personnel, and a very small handful of privileged civilians who fall into several “eligible categories” have access to firearms. The average citizen has no right to own any type of weapon whatsoever, and doing so illegally will land him or her in jail for many years. In situations like these, selecting who gets to have access to firearms and who doesn’t is the equivalent of selecting who gets to live or die.

“The State of Israel seems to think it has the power of God in deciding which citizens have a right to live and which don’t. Israel has no NRA or gun lobby, and those who wish to own a firearm in Israel are essentially powerless to do anything to change the situation. This situation is absolutely unacceptable, and we feel it is our moral duty to speak up against these criminal and immoral gun control laws in Israel. So, what are we doing about this?

“The Israeli government is not going to change their policies because those of us in the US oppose them. However, Israel has three national interests that we here in the US do have leverage over — •
Funding: Israel is heavily dependent on investment and donations from abroad. Israeli bonds and other contributions are essential to Israel’s economy.

  • Aliyah (immigration). Israel desperately wants to attract educated and successful American Jews to immigrate there. It sends emissaries abroad to encourage western immigration and invests tens of millions of shekels every year in this policy.
  • Political support. Israel heavily depends on American Jews and pro-Israel Christians to support organizations like AIPAC, speak out, and participate in rallies in support of Israel, especially when a major flare-up happens with Hamas in Gaza, usually sparking an international uproar.

“In these three areas, Israel is dependent on our cooperation and support. Threatening that cooperation and support is something the State of Israel is likely to pay attention to. If enough of us get on board, it might put enough pressure on Israel to change its draconian gun control policies. “We are taking the following three steps:

  • We are calling our local Israeli consulates or organizations that raise money for Israel and telling them that we will not donate one penny to Israel so long as it continues disarming its citizens in the face of Arab terror.
  • We are contacting our local Aliyah (immigration) emissaries and telling them that we would love to make Aliyah (immigrate to Israel), but we cherish our 2nd Amendment rights and will never consider moving there so long as we are barred from bringing our guns with us or buying guns locally.
  • We are contacting our local Israeli consulates, AIPAC and/or other pro-Israel organizations, and informing them that they cannot count on us for any kind of political support until Israel recognizes the right to bear arms and allows ALL its citizens to own firearms.

“The way we see it, if only a few of us do this, it will be easy for them to laugh us off and completely ignore us. However, if hundreds or thousands of us do this, they will have no choice but to listen.” For more information, please visit CherevGidon.com.

Categories
Allies

What I call a Happy Campper

Categories
Allies Well I thought it was neat!

I still cannot believe that Clint Eastwood is now 93 years old!!

Here he is in 1966 Italy doing the movie The Good, the Bad and the Ugly.

Categories
Allies Soldiering War

The Retired Israeli General Who Grabbed His Pistol and Took on Hamas

Israel Ziv, a retired Israeli army general, was taking a bike ride Saturday morning when a flood of alarming calls started coming in.

A huge barrage of rockets had been fired from Gaza. Gunmen from Hamas, the armed Palestinian group that controls the territory, were pouring across the border. Soon he would learn a friend’s son was trapped in a kibbutz.

He raced home, put on his uniform and grabbed his weapon, a nine-millimeter pistol.

Within minutes he was flying down a deserted highway in his new white Audi. As he neared the Gaza border, columns of black smoke rose in front of him, and the Israeli Army, at least at first, was nowhere to be seen. Hamas attackers were running across the landscape, hunched under the weight of heavy machine guns and rocket propelled grenade launchers, shooting at him.

“They were all over,” he said. “Hundreds of them.”

Mr. Ziv, stocky, spiky-haired, a bit irascible, and the former head of the operations directorate of the Israeli Defense Forces, is a well-known figure in Israel, especially now. His actions over the weekend — driving headlong into the battle zone armed only with a pistol, organizing a confused group of soldiers into a fighting unit and overseeing evacuations — have been widely publicized on Israeli news channels. In the process he has become an avatar of Israel’s D.I.Y. spirit — and of the failure of its military and intelligence agencies.

The Israeli government said the toll in the devastating incursion by Hamas had reached 1,200 people killed, most of them unarmed civilians.

Already, amid the anguish over the slaughter, public frustrations are beginning to boil, with many Israelis, Mr. Ziv among them, taking issue with the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

“The government is totally paralyzed,” said Mr. Ziv, who, even before this crisis, was extremely critical of Mr. Netanyahu for what he said were policies that bitterly divided Israelis and put the country’s security at risk.

Nevertheless, Mr. Ziv is still welcome in Israel’s corridors of power. On Wednesday, he held several teleconferences with captains of industry about raising tens of millions of dollars to help victims and their families.

“Just for civilians,” he shouted into his phone. “None of it for the army.”

He spoke to the top brass of the military and the police about shoring up a civilian defense force that had clearly been overwhelmed.

He even walked into Israel’s Defense Ministry, where he met with the defense minister, Yoav Gallant, and held secret meetings with national security officials in which they left their mobile phones on the hallway floor before stepping inside a small office for a chat that, the hope was, could not be tracked.

So weakened is public faith in the country’s military that one of the biggest issues Israelis are talking about is arming themselves. Many already own weapons, but the government announced this week that it was purchasing 10,000 assault rifles for civilians, along with bulletproof vests. Mr. Ziv is spearheading an effort to empower retired generals and former soldiers to rebuild community defense squads in the Gaza border area and around the country.

“We need weapons,” one man pleaded with Mr. Ziv as he visited a massacre site on Wednesday. “And we need a system.”

Mr. Ziv put a hand on the man’s back and said, “We are putting together that system right now.”

As they spoke, huge booms thundered and black smoke billowed up from the horizon, obscuring the banana farms and the wire fence along Gaza’s border with Israel that Hamas had breached to launch the assault. Gaza, only a few miles away, has been under relentless attack by Israeli warplanes since Saturday, killing hundreds of Palestinians.

And in just about every village where Israelis have been slaughtered, when a light breeze stirred the slender eucalyptus trees it also carried the smell of death.

Mr. Ziv spent Wednesday moving through this landscape. Sixty-six years old and a decorated paratrooper, he revisited the same terrain where he had tried to rescue as many people as he could. That included the site of the ill-fated desert rave party where Hamas terrorists massacred hundreds of young people — which Mr. Ziv believes might have been a primary target of the attack. Just about everywhere he went, soldiers and civilians thanked him, then shyly asked for a selfie.

His account of what he did on Saturday has been backed up by other retired generals and active duty officers who fought with him over the weekend.

He left his house, a beautiful home overlooking olive groves near Tel Aviv, and arrived in the battle zone around 10 a.m.. He was traveling with a close friend, Noam Tibon, a retired general whose son was trapped in the Nahal Oz kibbutz.

Mr. Tibon’s son, a prominent journalist, had called his father in deep distress, saying gunmen were closing in on him and his family. In recent media interviews, Mr. Tibon said he told his son, “Trust me, I will come. This is my profession. Nobody can stop me.”

Mr. Ziv said that as they drove closer to Gaza, fires burned everywhere and unchallenged Hamas gunmen fired into buildings and passing cars. At first, he said, he didn’t see any Israeli soldiers. But as they traveled deeper toward the besieged villages, they encountered small bands of Israeli soldiers trying to fight back but clearly outnumbered.

“Things were not organized,” Mr. Ziv said.

He and Mr. Tibon linked up with a platoon of young soldiers, piled several of them into the Audi, and began attacking Hamas gunmen on the road, Mr. Ziv said.

It was difficult taking them on with just a pistol, Mr. Ziv said, but after a soldier in his car was wounded, Mr. Ziv snatched his M16 and started firing out the window.

The worst feeling, though, was knowing that although they were some of the first responders, they were already too late.

Bodies were strewn on the highway, along the paths in the kibbutzim, in the patches of shaded forest they passed. What Mr. Ziv shared has been corroborated by extensive video and photo evidence, some of it filmed by the Hamas gunmen themselves. They hunted down Israeli civilians sitting in their cars, huddling in their homes, hiding at a bus stop and running for their lives.

“No one could imagine they would do what they did,” Mr. Ziv said. “It is a brutality that we have not witnessed since the establishment of Israel.”

He added: “So now we need to change the whole doctrine about Gaza,” he said. “No more Hamas.”

How do you do that? he was asked.

“Level the ground,” he said.

Mr. Ziv and Mr. Tibon split up near the kibbutz where Mr. Tibon’s son lives. While Mr. Tibon joined a group of Israeli soldiers fighting Hamas members there, and eventually rescued his son, Mr. Ziv raced to other hot spots. He said he spent nearly 24 hours straight rushing around the kibbutzim and villages under attack, firing his own weapon, organizing evacuations of civilians and coordinating with the military to dispatch backup units as fast as possible.

The worst he found was the rave site. On Friday night, several thousand young people, Israelis and many foreigners, had flocked to an open field a few miles from the Gaza border to hold an overnight open-air dance party. By the time Mr. Ziv reached it Saturday night, he said, there was nothing left to be done.

There were bodies everywhere: in the campsite; in the field where everyone had been dancing; in car after car after car lining the road, filled with young people trying to escape.

He ran to one young man slumped out of a car and felt his neck. No pulse.

“I think the trigger for this whole attack was this event,” Mr. Ziv said. “Hamas planned this for a long time. But they knew a critical mass would be here this weekend.”

From evidence the Israeli military found at the rave site, and what witnesses said, the Hamas attackers surrounded the gathering on three sides. One group of gunmen opened fire on the crowd, methodically driving the panicked partygoers toward the road, where more gunmen were waiting to mow them down.

“I can still hear them screaming,” Mr. Ziv said.

He stood on the site looking out at a field littered with water bottles, rolled up sleeping mats, still-full boxes of Oreos, shirts, pants, tents and empty camp chairs. It was like everything was there but the people. One soldier quietly moved past him, carrying a black plastic bag, looking for documents.

“People don’t understand how fragile the situation is,” Mr. Ziv said. “Hamas has to pay for this.” He paused. “With their existence.”

He then walked away.

______________________________________________                If this is true and not BS Propaganda. Then this guy is a real stud in my book. Grumpy

Categories
All About Guns Allies War You have to be kidding, right!?!

Israel – Ben Gvir says 10,000 assault rifles purchased for civilian security teams By JEREMY SHARON

Guns, helmets and body armor to be distributed to hundreds of residents of border regions, mixed Jewish-Arab cities, West Bank settlements

Members of the civilian security team of Kibbutz Malkia in northern Israel close to the Lebanese border are seen during a drill simulating the Infiltration of a terrorist into the kibbutz, July 19, 2023. (Ayal Margolin/Flash90)

Members of the civilian security team of Kibbutz Malkia in northern Israel close to the Lebanese border are seen during a drill simulating the Infiltration of a terrorist into the kibbutz, July 19, 2023. (Ayal Margolin/Flash90)

National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir announced on Tuesday that his ministry is purchasing 10,000 rifles to arm civilian security teams, specifically those in towns close to Israel’s borders around the country, as well as mixed Jewish-Arab cities and West Bank settlements.

The minister, who heads the far-right Otzma Yehudit party, said 4,000 assault rifles had already been acquired from an Israeli manufacturer and will be distributed immediately.

Helmets and bulletproof vests have also been acquired and will be distributed along with the assault rifles.

The step comes after some civilian security teams reported they had no weapons to fight off Hamas terrorists during Saturday’s devastating assault on southern Israel.

In a statement to the press on Tuesday, Ben Gvir said the new weapons and equipment will be distributed to “hundreds of towns” that have civilian security teams, some of which are manned by civilians who also volunteer in the Border Police, the Israel Police’s gendarmerie unit.

In addition, new civilian security teams will be established in towns that currently lack them, the national security ministry said.

National Security Itamar Ben Gvir during a visit to southern Tel Aviv, September 3, 2023. (Avshalom Sassoni/Flash90)

“We will turn the world upside down so that towns are protected. I have given instructions for massively arming the civilian security teams to provide solutions for towns and cities, and so as not to leave towns unprotected, preparations will be made for a Guardian of the Walls 2,” said Ben Gvir, in reference to the May 2021 conflict with Hamas, which was accompanied by severe inter-communal violence in Israel’s mixed Jewish-Arab cities.

When Israel’s Jewish-Arab cities were the scene of intense riots during the May 2021 conflict with Hamas, Ben Gvir, at the time an MK but not a minister, urged armed Israeli civilians to go to such cities to combat Arab rioters.

Categories
Allies Real men Soldiering War Well I thought it was neat!

The 93rd Sutherland Highland Regiment of Foot 1800 – 1881

he 93rd Regiment of Foot, Sutherland Highlanders was raised in April 1799 in the mountains and remote north of Scotland – the lands of Sutherland, Ross, Caithness, the Orkneys and Shetlands. Most of the men were from “Fencible” regiments, home defense forces raised to check the threat of invasion by France and Napoleon. There had been three such Sutherland Regiments and the last, the 3rd – had emerged from the inglorious Irish 1798 rebellion with a uniquely high reputation and along with the Reay Fencibles contributed greatly to the new Regiment’s strength.

Major-General William Wemyss of Wemyss raised the 93rd for his 16 year old cousin Elizabeth, Countess of Sutherland. Extra numbers were drawn in 1803 from the disbanded Reay Fencibles, Rothesay and Caithness Fencibles, and the Scots Militia. Most of the remainder were added from the Sutherland estates in a process harking back to the old feudal system. Assembled young men would be looked over by General Wemyss and likely looking prospects would be invited to drink a dram of whisky and take snuff from a large silver-bound horn mull, no further attesting deemed necessary.

This was the last instance of the old feudal clan form of gathering men to fight. After this ceremony the men would be told when and where to assemble. Amazingly, every man showed up at the designated time. From the start the 93rd became the most solidly and characteristically Highland of all Scottish regiments.

Most of the men were native Gaelic speakers, raised in the traditions of the family, clan and parish. The Regiment now became the “clan” with the commanding officer as “chief”. The Regiment wore what they called “Sutherland Tartan”, a version of the Government Sett (more commonly known as “Black Watch”).

Formally gazetted into the Army in October 1800, the 93rd were dispatched from Fort George, via Aberdeen, to Guernsey. In February 1803, they were sent to quell a brief rebellion in Dublin. During these years they moved about Ireland, becoming quite popular with the Irish people because of their Gaelic language, high discipline and firm and steady conduct. The Regiment in its history would find itself many more times in Ireland. On one occasion a section was sitting in a tavern when a local bully came in challenging them to a fight. The smallest Highlander accepted, rose, lowered his head, ran and butted the bully in the stomach, flattening him. The rest drew their bayonets, cleared the tavern then quietly went back to their conversation and drink.

 

The 93rd sailed in July 1805 to help recapture Cape Colony from the Dutch. There the 93rd won their first battle honour. While landing 37 men were lost, still cheering madly as their boat capsized. In the ensuing battle the 93rd advanced in line, pipes playing, fired one volley and charged. The enemy broke and ran. After limited skirmishing over the next days Cape Town surrendered and the 93rd moved into Cape Castle, their home for the next eight years.

In an age of great illiteracy, especially in the army, the 93rd was amazing in that nearly every man could read and write. Almost every private had his own Bible – often having been given to him by his family. In Cape Town they built their own church, hired a Chaplain, taught school and gave to charities sending huge amounts home to help those in need.

 

A remarkable, cheerful and united body of men given to music and Highland dancing. Such was their discipline and good conduct that while in garrison with other regiments the 93rd repeatedly was dismissed from Parade when corporal punishment commenced. Instead of having to see the example given by floggings, they instead became the example of discipline.

 

In August 1814 the 93rd sailed to Plymouth, England thinking of home. Instead on 17 September they embarked on three ships as part of a three-pronged offensive designed to chastise the United States and end the war dragging on there since 1812 when the U.S. declared war and invaded Canada. Napoleon had been sent into his first exile. Tens of thousands of veteran British soldiers were now free to be used in America. One prong of this strategy would attack through the Great Lakes region, the second front would smash into the eastern seaboard ultimately to burn the capital of Washington in retaliation for U.S. forces burning York (Toronto), Canada. The third – with the 93rd aboard – would attack through the Gulf of Mexico. Their final destination: New Orleans.

For this expedition the 93rd were ordered to wear tartan trousers (trews) and “hummel” bonnets in place of the kilt and feathered bonnet. No other Highland units were in this Division and as only Highland Regiments wore the kilt it is obvious then there were no kilted soldiers involved in the New Orleans campaign, contrary to what Hollywood movies (especially either version of “The Buccaneer”) and some popular thought would like us to believe.

 

The 93rd landed on 23 December moving up the swamp. American militia attacked at night and a chaotic battle ensued. Elements of the 93rd helped turn the U.S. flank; by dawn superior discipline, training and the bayonet had prevailed over raw troops in the open. The Americans withdrew. Andrew Jackson would not dare to expose his rag tag army in such a way again. On 25 December the British commander arrived. Sir Edward Packenham, the “Hero of Salamanca” and the Duke of Wellington’s brother in law. He was not pleased with the situation nor the terrain he found his army in. Jackson made his stand behind a make shift parapet along a canal 5 miles forward of New Orleans. The main British concern was the limited amount of room to maneuver before sweeping over this small obstacle: after all, in the wars with Napoleon fortifications ten times more massive and defended by professional soldiers had been breached and taken. Rain, sleet and cold assailed the men throughout the campaign. Packenham’s advance on 28 December was halted 700 yards in front of Jackson’s parapet and which withdrew not knowing the American left flank had been turned.

 

Had the probe been turned into an outright attack, the outcome of the Battle of New Orleans might have been quite different indeed. As many as 30 guns were brought up by the British to try and reduce the American parapet which had been reinforced with mud and earth. (The cotton bales had proved useless and were mostly used as gun platforms.)

 

The American artillery proved their worth many times over during this campaign, dislodging British artillery and eventually accounting for the horrendous casualty tally. An aborted assault was tried on 1 January, turning into an artillery duel.

 

 

Then came the calamatious assault of 8 January. Everything conceivable went wrong. The total result was for the army a disgrace; for the 93rd a tragedy. The Light Company helped to take a forward redoubt but without support were eventually driven out, captured or killed. The main body of the 93rd, some 960 men, moved up in column along the river road on the British left to reinforce where needed, originally to help the Light companies taking the advance US redoubt by the river. Then the British right faltered, US cannon fire from the west bank was continued and so the 93rd with pipes playing “Moneymusk” (the Regimental charge) was ordered to cross the field diagonally to assist the right flank. 100 yards from the parapet Regimental commander Colonel Dale ordered a halt – whether to begin forming an attack column or to ascertain the situation will never be known – he was killed immediately after.

 

Their brigade commander, Gen. Keane, was also down, as was the commander of the British right flank, Gen. Gibbs. Many more 93rd officers fell. Packenham rode forward to rally his army and died not far from the 93rd, having previously called out, “Have a little patience 93rd and you shall have your revenge!” The Regiment had no further orders and so stood, “firm and immovable as a brick wall” as one American observer was to write.

 

Other units broke and ran all round them. Most accounts of the battle state the British never even saw the Americans as the defenders would merely throw their firelocks up onto the parapet and fire without exposing even their faces. General Lambert, having taken command and seeing the 93rd standing their ground alone in the murderous artillery fire and haphazard musketry, sent orders for the Regiment to withdraw. Major Creagh, now in command, had first endeavored to advance but was at length compelled to turn back. So the 93rd came back in parade ground precision suffering between 300 to 500 casualties: three quarters of the Regiment’s force and one fourth of total British casualties.

 

The quiet stoicism of the 93rd was again displayed by the example of a 93rd man who lost an arm to the surgeon’s knife. A friend lying next to him commented, “Jock, you’ll never strike a man again with that arm.” The man asked the surgeon for a last look at the arm and after contemplating the limb, hit his friend with it, saying, “You’ll be the last!”.

 

The New Orleans debacle must be blamed on a series of mistakes, bad luck, failure to execute certain elements of the battle plan and the generalship displayed at the time by Jackson. It should be noted that on the opposite (West) bank of the Mississippi River the British advance triumphed, driving the Americans from their line (they ran for two miles) and capturing artillery and colours. One of those cannons was engraved as having been captured from the British at Yorktown during the Revolution. This piece now stands in the Royal Military Academy at Sandhurst.

 


“Battle of New Orleans” by Col. Chs. H. Waterhouse. In many respects a good depiction of the attack on the parapet after the British capture of the advance redoubt next to the river bank. However, errors exist: This scene makes it appear the handful of US Marines actually present single-handedly engaged and stopped the enemy. (As this was painted by a Marine, it’s understandable.)
The US counterattack was also made up primarily of men from the 7th US Infantry and Beal’s Rifles (a local militia). We also do not see any men from the Light Companies of the British 7th and 43rd Regiments who were involved in this attack, nor do we see any of the advance redoubt which had just been overrun and captured.
For once the 93rd Highlanders are shown correctly in trousers. There is speculation some, due to shortage of tartan issue, were in grey trousers. The red stripe of the officer’s pants is debatable. He should also be wearing wing style epaulettes for a flank company and carrying a sabre, not a baskethilt, and sword baldric with slings. As it was the Light Company involved, the men’s shoulder wings are correct, however, the touries (pompoms) on the top of the bonnets should be green for Light Coy.
Also debatable is the presence of US troops on top of the parapet – as all eyewitness accounts state the US troops never showed their faces above the parapet and at this position of the battlefield – inside the redoubt and behind the parapet – an uneasy stalemate occured with both forces keeping their heads down for fear of being shot. Of course, the musket swinging “Davy Crockett” style stance of the Marine at top left is plain silly. 
The British remained in camp for ten days and by the 30th of January were finally embarked and gone. After leaving New Orleans the British captured Fort Bowyer outside Mobile. Two weeks later they learned of the peace treaty of Ghent, signed on 24 December but not ratified by Congress until two months later.

 

Upon arrival back in Britain the 93rd was helped back to strength with men from a short-lived Second Battalion of the Regiment which had spent its existence as a garrison in Newfoundland. It was not enough nor soon enough to enable the Regiment to take part in Napoleon’s final defeat at Waterloo in June, though some officers of the 93rd were there with other units.

 

It is interesting to note New Orleans was the only defeat ever suffered by the old 93rd – and it was the only time they wore trousers into battle.

For a more detailed look and some pop myth busting on the Battle of New Orleans,go here.

For a look at some shots from an A&E TV documentary film on the Battle which the 93rd SHRoFLHU worked on click here.

 

During the “long peace” following the end of Napoleon, the 93rd spent ten years in Britain and Ireland, eleven years in the West Indies from 1823 to 1834 (having the least number of deaths there of any regiment) being stationed variously at Barbados, Antigua, St. Christopher, Montserrat, St. Lucia and Dominica. Then three years at home. They came to Canada in 1838 to aid in quelling an insurrection there. From Nova Scotia the 93rd moved all about Canada. No.4 Company through the entire rebellion was attached to the 71st HLI in the Lower Provinces.

 

The 93rd was present at the capture of the Windmill after which they were reunited at Toronto. The Regiment spent 10 years in Canada at various garrisons including Drummondsville, Montreal, and Quebec.

 

One instance of note involved a Volunteer Regiment in garrison with the 93rd. These fellows continued over a long period to hurl abuse and insult at the stoically patient Highlanders until a gang of Volunteers actually beat up a 93rd Sergeant. At word of this the barracks emptied and a fisticuff battle ensued with the 93rd finally mauling and chasing the entire Volunteer battalion out of garrison and through the town.

 

The commanders of both Regiments watched the proceedings helplessly, the 93rd Colonel at one point trying to intervene only to be lifted by a large 93rd Sergeant by one hand and gently set aside, whereupon the Sergeant saluted smartly and turned back to punching his adversaries. No charges were ever brought against anyone and there was no mention in any official army documents of the incident. It is safe to assume no one ever insulted the 93rd again, either.

 

In 1854 they were back in England when war broke out with Russia. By September they were in the Crimea. With the 42nd and 79th regiments they formed the Highland Brigade under Sir Colin Campbell, an old Napoleonic veteran and one of the few actually good generals in positions of command.

 

On 20 September the Brigade in full Highland uniform, with the Guards Brigade, waded the Alma River. Advancing in echelon, the British took the heights above while under constant heavy fire. The 93rd was engaged for the next months alternating in the siege of Sebastopol and serving garrison duty. On 25 October they were positioned to protect the main British supply base. A port called Balaklava.

Several thousand Russian cavalry had swept down and captured artillery batteries overlooking a small valley. They rode on with about five thousand continuing on the road to Balaklava, the others diverting to be cut down by the charge of the Heavy Brigade. The 93rd – about 500 including a few walking-wounded of other units – stood behind a ridge in the road to avoid the artillery now turned against them.

 

As the Russian cavalry came nearer the 93rd moved forward and stood in line astride the road to the port and the British supplies. On either flank stood a battalion of their Turkish allies who fired an ineffectual volley at 800 yards, then broke and ran. (It may seem from a correspondence from a 93rd officer at the time that 50 casualties suffered by the Turks may have come from a volley purposely fired by a company of the 93rd into their fleeing allies!)

 

Sir Colin Campbell rode down the line: “There is no retreat from here men, you must die where you stand.” A chorus was taken up by the 93rd in answer, “Aye Sir Colin, and needs be we’ll do that.” Campbell did not form the regiment into the usual square formation to withstand cavalry but rather left them in line, later commenting, “I knew the 93rd, and knew there was no need (to form square).” They fired a volley at 500 yards from their rifled muskets and another at 250 yards. They commenced fire by files.

 

The cavalry split in half and veered to the left and right wheeling back. The Grenadier Company wheeled right to fire once more into the horsemen to refuse the flank and insuring the enemy’s retreat. On a hill above, London Times correspondent W.H. Russell watched and wrote of nothing standing between the cavalry and the supply base but “the thin red streak tipped with steel”. This news report gained the Regiment immortality and gave them their nickname. The phrase was popularly condensed to become “THE THIN RED LINE”.

 

The 93rd suffered as other regiments from cold and disease through the rest of the war. Finally they returned home in June 1856 to great acclaim. Only a year later they were diverted from their destination of China to land in Calcutta and be reunited with Sir Colin to help quell the Indian Mutiny.

Having seen the grisly, slaughterhouse remains of the men, women and children prisoners murdered out of hand at Cawnpore by rebellious Sepoy regiments’ mutineers, the 93rd, with other British and loyal Indian units fought with a vengeance up to Lucknow where the beleaguered Residency still held out.

 

On 11 November 1857 the 93rd faced the two great fortified enclosures of the Sikander Baugh and behind it the Shah Najif. The 93rd swept forward to the pipes playing the “Haughs of Cromdell”. Nine officers and men got through a hole in the wall and, fighting hand to hand held the way open for the rest, eventually forcing the gate open. Fierce fighting continued and as evening fell the enclosure was cleared.

 

Two thousand mutineers lay dead inside, most of them killed by the bayonet. Sir Colin called on the 93rd once more and sword in hand led them against the Shah Najif. After a terrific cannonade against the walls with little effect and hostile fire beating down, a 93rd Sergeant literally found a back door in.

 

The Regiment rushed round and inside to see the last of the mutineers scurrying out yet another back way. At dawn the Highlanders uncased their Colours on top of a tower inside so those in the Residency knew relief was at hand. Drummer boy Ross who helped in this feat played “Yankee Doodle” on his bugle “so my American cousins (Canadian relatives) would know I was here!”. The harried defenders of the Residency were brought out safely and the 93rd had won six Victoria Crosses.

 

This was not the end as the relief force now had to escort the relieved to safety and then turn its attention on the rebels occupying Cawnpore once more. From 29 November to 6 December the 93rd was engaged in helping drive out and disperse the rebels. On 1 March 1858 the Regiment with the rest of the army arrived back at Lucknow to finish the job. Lucknow was now the center of rebel power.

 

Over the next few days the British were involved in enclosing the enemy and retaking that which had been so dearly won previously. On the 11th the 93rd assaulted the strongly garrisoned and fortified Begum Kothi, practically repeating their performances earlier.

 

Fierce hand to hand combat was again carried through the fort. Adjutant Wm. McBean was awarded the V.C. for encountering eleven of the enemy in succession and cutting them down with his sword. (McBean was one of those rare fellows: enlisted as a private at age 16, held every rank in the army, never leaving the Regiment, eventually commanded the 93rd and died an honourary Major-General.)

Artillery fire finally formed a small hole in the wall. Pipe Major John McLeod was the first to enter the breach. No sooner was he in than he began and continued through the entire fight to encourage the men with his bagpipe music. By the 21st the fighting in the city was over. There was still long, hard campaigning over the next months against scattered rebels before the 93rd finished with the suppression of the Mutiny. Then it was long years of garrison duty and border fighting in India, including the Umbeyllah Campaign. It would not be until March 1870, twelve and a half years later, that the Regiment would stand once more in Scotland.

 

Victoria Cross Winners

Capt. W.G.D. Stewart
C/Sgt. J. Munro
Sgt. J. Paton
L/Cpl. J. Dunley
Private P. Grant
Private D. MacKay
Lt. WM. McBean
 


Memorial to the Fallen of the 93rd during the Indian Mutiny, in St. Giles Cathedral, Edinburgh.
The 93rd spent 9 happy years at home in Britain. In 1879 they were sent for 2 years to Gibraltar. In 1881 came a reorganization of the British army and the 93rd was amalgamated with the 91st Argyllshire Regiment, becoming the Argyll & Sutherland Highlanders (Second Battalion).

 

Over the long years since, the Regiment carried on with duty and dignity in peace and war. The worst “battle” was with the War Office in the 1960’s to remain in existence after the famous Aden affair with Lt. Col. “Mad Mitch” Colin Mitchell in command.

 

Public outcry and a petition with one million signatures helped keep the Regiment alive. Through war, disease, capture and further amalgamation with the First Battalion, the 93rd has lived on. Today “The Thin Red Line” still stands firm in our ever changing world.

A&S Highlanders in Iraq.

 

“Outnumbered British soldiers killed 35 Iraqi attackers in the Army’s first bayonet charge since the Falklands War 22 years ago. The fearless Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders stormed rebel positions after being ambushed and pinned down.

 

Despite being outnumbered five to one, they suffered only three minor wounds in the hand-to-hand fighting near the city of Amara. The battle erupted after Land Rovers carrying 20 Argylls came under attack on a highway.After radioing for back-up, they fixed bayonets and charged at 100 rebels using tactics learned in drills.

 

When the fighting ended bodies lay all over the highway � and more were floating in a nearby river. Nine rebels were captured.
An Army spokesman said: “This was an intense engagement.” The last bayonet charge was by the Scots Guards and the Paras against Argentinian positions. ”

 

 
The Regiment Today
The Colonel-in-Chief:

  • Her Majesty the Queen.

The Colonel of the Regiment:

  • Major General D P Thomson CB CBE MC

Regimental Headquarters & Regimental Museum:

  • Stirling Castle

The Regular Army:

  • 1st Battalion the Argyll & Sutherland Highlanders (Princess Louise’s) based at Redford Barracks, Edinburgh.

The Territorial Army:

  • 7th/8th (Volunteer) Battalion the Argyll & Sutherland Highlanders (Princess Louise’s) with Headquarters & one Company in Stirling. Companies in Falkirk, Cumbernauld & Dumbarton & a detachment in Dunoon.

The Army Cadet Force:

  • The Argyll & Sutherland Highlanders Battalion ACF.
  • Detachments of the West Lowland Battalion ACF Combined Cadet Force.
  • Dollar Academy CCF.

Alliances:

  • The Argyll & Sutherland Highlanders of Canada (Princess Louise’s).
  • The Calgary Highlanders.
  • The Royal New South Wales Regiment.
  • 1st Battalion (Scinde) the Frontier Force Regiment.

Affiliations:

  • HMS Argyll

Regimental Association: Headquarters: Stirling Castle
Branches:

  • Stirling, Grangemouth, West of Scotland Branch, London, Manchester, Plymouth & South West.

Freedom Burghs:

  • Stirling 1947
  • Dunoon 1953
  • Oban 1963
  • Dumbarton 1963
  • Inveraray 1963
  • Lochgilphead 1965
  • Campbeltown 1968
  • Tobermory 1970
  • Falkirk 1972
  • Denny and Dunipace 1974
  • Alloa 1974
  • Gourock 1974
  • Kilsyth 1974
  • Tarbert Castle 1974
  • Grangemouth 1974
  • Argyll & Bute 1979

If ever in Scotland, visit the

  • Argyll & Sutherland Highlanders Regimental Museum in Stirling Castle.. Follow the fascinating story of the A & S H in the exhibitions of personal artifacts, uniforms, medals & unique silver collection. Admission to the museum is free but there is an entry charge to the Castle.
    Opening times:
    Easter – September:
    Monday to Saturday 10am to 5.45pm
    Sunday 11am to 4.45pm
    October – Easter:
    10am – 4.15pm
    Telephone: 01786 476165
    One may also view 93rd relics at Dunrobin Castle in Sutherland and at the United Services Museum in Edinburgh Castle.
    To get a History of the 93rd with names and dates in a nutshell go to a Concise History of the 93rd

     

    Sources used for this article:
    “Historical Records of the 93rd Sutherland Highlanders”, compiled and edited by Roderick Hamilton Burgoyne, late 93rd Highlanders. London, 1883.
    “An Reisimeid Chataich, The 93rd Sutherland Highlanders”, by Brig. Gen. A.E.J. Cavendish, CMG. 1928. Published Privately.
    “History of the 93rd Sutherland Highlanders…1800-1895”, by Lt. Col. Percy Groves, R.G.A. W & AK Johnston, Edinburgh & London, 1895.
    “Records of Service and Campaigning In Many Lands”, by Surgeon-General Munro, MD, CB., late of 93rd Highlanders. London. 1887.
    “Reminiscences of Military Service with the 93rd Sutherland Highlanders”, by Surgeon-General Munro, MD, CB., formerly surgeon of the regiment. London. 1883.
    “Reminiscences of the Great Mutiny 1857-59”, by Wm. Forbes-Mitchell, late sergeant 93rd Highlanders. London. 1895.
    “Recollections of A Highland Subaltern”, by Lt. Col. W. Gordon-Alexander, late 93rd Highlanders. London. 1898.
    “Fighting Highlanders! The History of The Argyll & Sutherland Highlanders”, by Major P.J.R. Mileham. London. 1993.
    “Famous Regiments, The Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders”, by Douglas Sutherland, M.C. London. 1969.
    “The Scottish Regiments 1633-1987”, by Maj. P.J.R. Mileham. 1988.
    “The Scottish Soldier”, by Stephen Wood. Manchester. 1987.
    “Soldiers of Scotland”, by Lt. Col. John Baynes Bt, M.Sc. 1988.
    “The Highland Brigade in the Crimea”, founded on letters written during the years 1854, 1855 & 1856, by Lt. Col. Anthony Sterling, “a staff officer who was there”. “A History of the Regiments & Uniforms of the British Army”, by Major R.M. Barnes. London. 1950.
    “Scottish Military Uniforms”, by Robert Wilkinson-Latham. Hippocrene Books, 1975.
    “Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders”, by Wm. McElwee and Michael Roffe. Osprey. 1972.
    “The Naval War of 1812” by Theodore Roosevelt. NY, 1889.
    “Blaze of Glory – the Fight for New Orleans 1814-1815″ by Samuel Carter III, St. Martin’s Press, NY.
    The Pictorial Field Book of the War of 1812”, by Benson Lossing, NY 1869, reprint 1976.
    “The British at the Gates-The New Orleans Campaign in The War of 1812” by Robin Reilly. Putnam, NY 1974.
    “Amateurs to Arms”, by Col. JR Elting.1991.
    “With Musket, Cannon and Sword – Battle Tactics of Napoleon and His Enemies” by Brent Nosworthy.
    “The Armies of Wellington” by Philip J. Haythornthwaite. 1994.
    “Weapons and Equipments of the Napoleonic Wars”, by Philip J. Haythornthwaite. London, 1996.
    “British Infantry Of The Napoleonic Wars”, by Philip J. Haythornthwaite. London, 1987.
    “Life In Wellington’s Army”, by Antony Brett-James. London, 1994 edition.
    “The Campaigns of the British Army at Washington and New Orleans, 1814-1815” by Rev. G. R. Gleig. London 1827.
    “A Subaltern in America, Comprising His Narrative of the British Army at Baltimore, Washington, etc..”, by Rev. G. R. Gleig. Philadelphia, 1833.
    “British Sieges Of The Peninsular War”, by Frederick Myatt. Spellmount, UK, 1987.
    “The Dawn of Modern Warfare – History of the Art of War, Vol. IV”, by Hans Delbr�ck (1848-1929). Translated by Walter J. Renfroe, Jr. Univ. of Nebraska, 1990.
    “Biographical Sketches of the Veterans of the Battle of New Orleans 1814-1815” by Ronald R. Morazan. Legacy Publishing, 1979.
    “Frederick The Great on the Art of War”, edited & translated by Jay Luvaas. NY, 1966.
    “Military Marching – A Pictorial History”, by James Cramer. Forward by Lt. Gen. Sir Napier Crookenden, KCB, DSO, OBE, DL. Spellmount, 1992.
    “The Face of Battle”, by John Keegan. NY, 1976.
    “The Mask of Command”, by John Keegan. 1987.
    “Firepower – Weapons Effectiveness On The Battlefield, 1630-1850”, by Maj. Gen. B.P. Hughes, CB, CBE. NY, 1997.
    “The FootSoldier”, by Martin Windrow & Richard Hook. Oxford Univ. Press, 1982.
    “Forward into Battle-Fighting Tactics from Waterloo to the Near Future” by Paddy Griffith (16 years senior lecturer in War Studies at Sandhurst). Presidio Press, Novato, CA. 1990.
    “The Elements of the Science of War; Theory and Practice” by William Muller KGL 1811. (classic example of Pakenham’s tactics being “by the book”.)
    “The War of 1812 – A Forgotten Conflict” by Donald R. Hickey. Univ. of Illinois Press. 1989.
    “New Orleans 1815 – Andrew Jackson Crushes the British” by Timothy Pickles. Osprey, 1993.
    “The American War 1812-1814”, by Philip Katcher, Osprey, 1990.
    “Twenty-Five Years in the Rifle Brigade” by W. Surtees, 1833. Reprint by Greenhill Books.
    “A Full and Correct Account of The Military Occurrences of the Late War Between Great Britain and the United States of America”, by Wm. James, 1818.
    “The Battle of New Orleans – A British View”, the Journal of Major C.R. Forrest, Asst. Quarter Master General, New Orleans Campaign. Intro and annotations by Hugh F. Rankin. The Hauser Press, New Orleans, 1961.
    “Rough Notes of Seven Campaigns in Portugal, Spain, France and America, 1809-1815”, by John Spencer Cooper, late Sergeant, 7th Royal Fusiliers. Reprint of 1869 publication by Spellmount, 1996.
    “The Siege of New Orleans”, by Charles B. Brooks, Univ. of Washington Press, 1961.
    “Various Anecdotes and Events of my Life –The Autobiography of Lt. Gen. Sir Harry Smith, covering the period 1787 to 1860”, by Sir Harry Smith. First published in 2 volumes, edited by G.C. Moore, London, 1901.
    “The Historical Memoir of The War in West Florida and Louisiana in 1814-15, with an Atlas”, by Ars�ne LaCarri�re Latour, Major, principal engineer 7th Military District US Army, originally published 1816. The Historic New Orleans Collection and University of Florida Press. reprint 1999 – expanded edition edited by Gene A. Smith.
    “The Amphibious Campaign for West Florida and Louisiana, 1814-1815”, by Wilburt Brown (Maj. Gen. USMC, retired), University of Alabama, 1969.
    “The Dawn’s Early Light”, by Walter Lord, NY 1972.
    “The War of 1812 – Land Operations”, by George F.G. Stanley. MacMillan & national Museum of Canada, 1983.
    “When They Burned The White House”, by Andrew Tully. NY, 1961.
    “The Baratarians and the Battle of New Orleans”, by Jane Lucas de Grummond.
  • __________________________________________________ Sadly the Brits did away with this fine outfit and instead they now have a “Royal Regiment of Scotland” . The world is a lot duller now! Grumpy

 

Categories
Allies Soldiering War

Black Watch: Royal Highlander by Sidewinder Concepts

The Black Watch regiment is a storied unit within the Scottish military, dating back to the early 18th century. The origin of the Black Watch is similarly steeped in history, with a long lineage of skilled marksmen dating back centuries. Following the Jacobite Rebellion, loyalists of the Highland clans of Clan Campbell, Clan Munro, Clan Grant, Clan Frazer of Lovat, and Clan Mackenzie formed Black Watch.

Black Watch soldiers primarily recruited from these clans were known for their effective fighting tactics and distinctive dark-colored tartan kilts. From its formation to its amalgamation in 2006, Black Watch has contributed to some notably impactful moments in history.

WWII Black watch sniper.
WWII sniper scanning for enemy movement. (Photo credit: Readers Digest Canada)

Distinguished Honor

The Black Watch regiment, which had been established in the early 1700s, was no exception to this trend. Over time, the regiment developed a reputation for producing skilled marksmen, with many Black Watch soldiers distinguished in this field during both World War I and II.

The Black Watch marksman are known for their exceptional skills and techniques that made them famous in the military world. They emerged during the historic Second World War, where they proved their worth on the battlefield.

Masters of Concealment

Black Watch soldiers were trained to become experts in camouflage. They knew how to blend in with their surroundings, using natural covers, bushes, and other materials to conceal their position. This made it difficult for the enemy to detect them, which gave them an advantage in taking out their target without getting caught. The soldiers would even go to the extent of brushing their uniforms with soil or mud to match the terrain.

These soldiers were also masters of patience, a notable and distinctive trait. They would stay in position for hours or even days, waiting for the perfect moment to take a shot. They were trained to remain calm and steady, taking their shot only when they were confident they could hit their target. Working in teams, Black Watch soldiers supported each other during missions. They would communicate using hand signals or other methods to coordinate their movements and take down the enemy as a unit.

These soldiers were armed with top-of-the-line weapons, which they were proficient in handling. They trained to shoot with precision and accuracy, making sure that each shot would hit its intended target. They used advanced scopes, which allowed them to see farther than the enemy could.

Customized equipment and rifles suited to their personal preferences allowed for silent and efficient shot placement. In more recent times, the Black Watch has continued to produce top-notch snipers.

Lovat Scouts.
Camouflage inspection from British officers. (Photo credit: National Army Museum)

Adversaries in War

Snipers in general can be traced back to the 18th century, specifically the American Revolution. During this time, both sides utilized sharpshooters to target key individuals and disrupt enemy movements. The practice of sniping quickly gained popularity, particularly within the British military. The tradition of sniping continued throughout the 19th and 20th centuries, with the development of innovative technologies and tactics. By World War I, snipers were a crucial part of many armies, including the British Army.

diagram of Black Watch soldiers
Black watch uniform manual.

Leaders of the Craft

Black Watch marksmen became famous for their exceptional strategies, which integrated excellent camouflage, advanced weapons, patience, and teamwork. Most snipers undergo grueling training courses that focus on various tasks, although it is the intensive training process that prepared Black Watch soldiers to complete high-risk missions with optimal success.

These marksmen must demonstrate strong mental and emotional discipline with patience, focus, and a heightened sense of situational awareness. They were required to remain calm under pressure to make split-second decisions, adapt to environmental conditions, and demonstrate they are self-sufficient with excellent critical thinking skills to operate.

The unique combination of specialized training and mental fortitude enabled these snipers to carry out immensely difficult missions with precision and success. Their remarkable achievements in the military world have inspired many and will continue to influence future generations. Today, the legacy of the Black Watch lives on, with the regiment still producing some of the finest sharpshooters in the world. The regiment has maintained its reputation for excellence in marksmanship, and its snipers continue to lead the way in the field of military sniping.

Categories
Allies Hard Nosed Folks Both Good & Bad Manly Stuff Soldiering

The Gurkhas

Categories
All About Guns Allies War

Top 8 CRAZIEST Israeli Weapons