Category: Allies

The CZ have announced that the Bundeswehr has selected the CZ P-10C OR FDE as the P13. The P13 will replace the P8A1, the Heckler & Koch USP, which entered service in 1994. CZ have described the selection as “one of the most significant milestones in its history.”
The P-10C is a striker-fired, short recoil, tilting barrel actioned service pistol, chambered in 9×19 with a standard magazine capacity of 15 rounds.
Introduced by CZ in 2017, the pistol has a 102mm (4in) barrel and an overall length of 187mm (7.4in). Unloaded, the pistol weighs in at 740g (26 ounces). The P-10C is already in service with the armed forces of the Czech Republic, having been adopted in 2020.
Jan Zajic, CZ CEO, told TFB that the new pistols “will be delivered in a configuration tailored to the Bundeswehr’s specific requirements and manufactured and tested in accordance with military specifications.” The P13 will have a flat dark earth finish and its slide will be cut ready for an optic.
The Bundeswehr has not yet announced if the pistols will be generally issued with a red dot sight as standard and if so which model of red dot will be issued. The P-10C OR reportedly beat out competition from Glock and Slovenia’s Arex.

“All the pistols for the German Bundeswehr will be produced in CZ’s production facility located in Uherský Brod, Czech Republic, which meets stringent quality and compliance standards.
We maintain sufficient manufacturing processes and capacity to serve military and law enforcement as well as commercial customers worldwide”, explained Zajic.
While local production of the pistols wasn’t a criterion in the Bundeswehr’s tender CZ noted that they will work closely with their partner in Germany, POL-TEC GmbH & Co., to fulfil the contract and provide comprehensive support to the Bundeswehr.

The quantity of pistols to be procured has not yet been announced by the German government but the order is expected to be significant, with CZ’s CEO Jan Zajic telling TFB that:
“We are honored that the German Bundeswehr has chosen CZ as its partner. Our success in this rearmament tender is one of the most significant achievements in CZ’s modern history.
It clearly confirms the outstanding reputation our firearms have earned through active deployment in real combat conditions. We look forward to a long-term cooperation with the Bundeswehr and to fulfilling all its requirements in line with the contract.”


Almost before the bodies were cold at Australia’s Bondi Beach, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and his colleagues were talking about stricter gun control laws, including limits on the number of licensed firearms an Australian citizen could own, and preventing non-citizens from getting a gun license.
Amid the anguish, there were some social media sneers at Americans for the number of mass shootings reported in the U.S., most of which happen in so-called “gun-free zones,” where the victims are just as disarmed as those who died at the Hannukkah celebration in Sydney.
But Albanese and his cheerleaders could learn something from us Yanks, and from Jews in Israel, where the threat of violence hovers over the population every single day.
Proponents of Australian-style disarmament deliberately ignore, or significantly downplay, the other side of this dilemma. Fifteen of Albanese’s countrymen are dead because they could not fight back.
Here’s a brief refresher of recent history to put this in perspective:
Back on Sept. 8 in East Jerusalem, two Palestinian killers opened fire at a bus station, viciously gunning down more than 20 people, killing six of them, until at least two people, including an armed private citizen, returned fire. Both attackers were fatally shot. The armed civilian was joined by an off-duty soldier in the armed response.
How many lives might have been saved had Australians been able to fight back, as their contemporaries half a world away?
When CBS News reported the East Jerusalem shooting, it waited until the sixth paragraph to mention how the attack was stopped. When the BBC initially reported the mass shooting, it noted the off-duty soldier and armed civilian “neutralized” the attackers.
Jump back in time to July 17, 2022 when a crazed killer opened fire in the food court at the Greenwood Park Mall in Greenwood, Indiana.
Armed with a rifle, the gunman fatally shot two people and likely would have upped the score, except for the quick actions of 22-year-old Elijah Dicken, a legally-armed private citizen who—firing from a distance estimated at 40 yards—put eight of the ten shots he fired into the murderer, ending the rampage.
This incident happened barely two months after an armed female citizen in Charleston, West Virginia put an end to what could have been a deadly mass shooting by a man identified as 37-year-old Dennis Butler.
As reported by WRAL News at the time, Butler’s misadventure started with him “speeding up and down a parking lot” inside an apartment complex where people were attending a graduation party and birthday party. When they asked him to slow down, he left and then returned to up the game, armed with a semi-automatic rifle, with which he opened fire.
But the unidentified armed citizen drew her legally carried handgun and stopped him, cold.
Lt. Tony Hazelett, with the Charleston Police Department, told reporters at the time, “This lady was carrying a lawful firearm. A law abiding citizen who stopped the threat of probably 20 or 30 people getting killed. She engaged the threat and stopped it. She didn’t run from the threat, she engaged it. Preventing a mass casualty event here in Charleston.”
Back in May of this year, a legally armed private citizen fatally shot a teen gunman who had just opened fire on two other people in downtown Seattle.
According to KING News, the young shooter—illegally armed with a handgun under Washington statute—was leaving the scene when the 57-year-old armed citizen drew his handgun and fired.
In early November, again in downtown Seattle, a pair of armed would-be carjackers made what firearms authority Massad Ayoob might call a critical error in the victim selection process.
They attempted to steal a sports car at gunpoint, only to be shot by the car’s owner. As reported by KOMO News at the time, both suspects ended up in the same hospital—one was dumped there by two other suspects, who quickly fled—while police arrested the other wounded man who was transported to the hospital.
When golf pro Phil Mickelson posted a message on ‘X’ about the Bondi Beach mass shooting, he observed, “The 2 terrorists didn’t seem affected by the strict gun laws already in place. In fact the shooting went on for a long time since there wasn’t anybody else with a gun to stop them. I’m not a big gun guy but even I’m not this dumb to believe what this guy is selling.”
He is catching lots of heat from anti-gunners, but self-defense-oriented people are coming to his defense with remarks including:
- “If Australia had a right to bear arms then this attack would not have even started.”
- “Both those killers would have been easy pickins if they had concealed carry over there. They didn’t even try to hide.”
- “Civilians bravely tried to stop the assailants – even without firearms – what armed police on the scene failed to. Two were killed outright and one wounded for the attempt. Even a few armed civilians with guns might have had a fighting chance to limit the tragedy.”
It is true that mass shootings in Australia are rare, but when they happen, nobody can fight back. Things are different in the U.S. and Israel.
Politicians like Prime Minister Albanese have armed security, while the people on Bondi Beach did not have that luxury. Citizens in Israel can get gun permits and can fight back. Millions of citizens in the U.S. can legally carry, and they have fought back.
Australia’s strict gun laws didn’t prevent the Bondi Beach mayhem. There’s a lesson in that for Prime Minister Albanese.
About Dave Workman
Dave Workman is a senior editor at TheGunMag.com and Liberty Park Press, author of multiple books on the Right to Keep & Bear Arms, and formerly an NRA-certified firearms instructor.

The Best & Worst Guns of 2023

The New Zealand government is working to reform its complex and draconian firearms law.
In 2019, a far-left ideologue mass murdered dozens of Muslims in New Zealand. One of his goals was to promote draconian gun laws in New Zealand and in the United States. He succeeded in New Zealand. Many extreme restrictions on firearms and ownership were piled onto already restrictive laws.
Far Left PM Jacinda Ardern was successful in pushing through the draconian law on a wave of media maximized emotion. As part of the pushback to these draconian exercises of power, the Hon. Nicole McKee was elected as a member of parliament for the ACT party in the election of 2020.
Associate Minister of Justice, Hon. Nicole McKee, was interviewed in 2024 by deerstalkers.org.nz:
Labour’s firearm law changes in 2019 affected everybody, not just hunters. Although, in saying that, hunters are a massive part of the licenced-firearms-owning community.
I recall when the kids were small, and hubby was studying, the only way we got meat on our table at home was when I went out and hunted for it. We could not afford supermarket meat.
The real motivation came in 2019. I was running my own business, running firearms licencing courses in rural and isolated communities.
I realised when the 2019 changes came into effect that they would affect everybody, not just the hunters, as I mentioned, but also target shooters, collectors, pest controllers and so on.
In the New Zealand election of 14 October 2023, the three conservative parties won 67 seats, while the far left parties dropped 21 seats to a total of 55. This was a tremendous repudiation of the far left in New Zealand. Gun owners are only 5% of the population of New Zealand.
Nicole McKee was elected to the New Zealand Parliament in 2020. She is a member of ACT, a conservative/libertarian party in New Zealand. ACT has 11 of the 67 conservative seats. The conservative coalition government started a process to reform the draconian gun law shortly after being elected. McKee is heading up the effort. From the Hon Nicole McKee June 1, 2024:
“Cabinet has agreed to the registry review terms of reference and the review is now underway,” Associate Minister of Justice, Hon Nicole McKee says.
The Hon Nicole McKee has been keeping people informed of the new government’s progress on reforming the disastrous and confusing laws passed in 2019. Here are excerpts from her releases. Americans will realize that defense of self and others, or militia use for the common defense, are not mentioned. From a September 11, 2024 ,release:
“I am focused on producing the best firearms laws in the world – laws that are easy to comply with and improve public safety.
“The previous Labour Government’s rushed, knee-jerk law changes have not made New Zealanders safer. More people were convicted of a firearm-related offence in 2023 than in 2019 – up 18 per cent.
From a December 17, 2024, release:
“Most firearms users are law abiding and responsible people. Many New Zealanders use firearms to hunt for food for their families, to control introduced pests, in farming and agriculture, and in sporting and competitive events.
All these activities are legitimate. They are all important because they benefit communities and help protect our natural environment.”
“The safety of our communities is at the heart of an effective firearms regime; it is important that everyone has confidence in how firearms are controlled. For that reason, everyone has a role to play in the rewrite of the Act. This upcoming round of public consultation is the first step in hearing from all New Zealanders about their views.”
From a release on March 2, 2025:
Firearms Prohibition Orders (FPOs) are made by the court when offenders have committed serious violent offences. They are in force for 10 years – prohibiting offenders from holding a firearms licence, and from being around or accessing firearms. Breaching the conditions of an FPO is a criminal offence, and offenders that do breach conditions can be liable for up to seven years in prison.
Legal Firearms Owner is abbreviated as LFO in the releases. From a November 11, 2025, press release by the Hon. Nicole McKee, Associate Minister of Justice:
“The current law has been modified dozens of times since it came into force over 40 years ago with many of those changes being rushed through with little to no scrutiny.
The result is a complex, confusing and bureaucratic patchwork that makes it difficult for LFOs to comply while not adequately keeping the public safe.
“The new law will be written in plain English, structured logically and with public safety at its core. It makes it much more difficult for firearms to get into the hands of criminals while allowing LFOs to continue to use their firearms safely and responsibly.
Some parts of the reform effort appear to be making the law more severe. New Zealand does not have a Second Amendment. Firearm owners are only five percent of the population.
From Hon. Nicole McKee’s release:
“Penalties for over 60 Arms Act offences will be increased, and eight new offences will be created – including new offences to reduce firearms entering the black market such as for straw buying and possessing a firearm with identification markings intentionally removed.
The Hon Nicole McKee is an impressive woman. She appears to be doing the best she can with the situation as it exists. With only five percent of the population as legal gun owners and no Second Amendment, she is pushing for the rule of law when it comes to firearm ownership in New Zealand.
The assumption is that firearms ownership will be legal if the rules are followed. She is focusing on making the rules clear and easy to follow.
It may be the best that can be expected in New Zealand. The law is in the formative stage. We will not know the particulars until it actually passes the New Zealand parliament.
About Dean Weingarten:
Dean Weingarten has been a peace officer, a military officer, was on the University of Wisconsin Pistol Team for four years, and was first certified to teach firearms safety in 1973.
He taught the Arizona concealed carry course for fifteen years until the goal of Constitutional Carry was attained. He has degrees in meteorology and mining engineering, and retired from the Department of Defense after a 30 year career in Army Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation.