Categories
All About Guns Allies Fieldcraft

Bucket of Bucks Legal Fights Cost Money … Lots of It! By Dave Workman

Many years ago, at my local gun club, we would include in the monthly meeting the passing around of a small pail. Everybody kicked in a dollar or two — or maybe 10 — and we called it the “Bucket of Bucks,” with the money going to the National Rifle Association.

2A Defense can take many different approaches, big or small, and this one can be one of the best if it is done properly.

Two Things

 

There are two principles in life beyond death and taxes — lawsuits cost money, and lots of it. This year’s legislative sessions in many states produced the kind of laws that beg to be challenged, and good attorneys do not work for free.

Now is a good time for local gun clubs, gun show operators or anyone conducting a shooting match or some other function to help raise these important dollars. I once saw a guy throw in a crisp $100 bill, turn quickly around and disappear into the crowd.

Funds collected in such a manner can be consolidated and sent every couple of months to where they will do the most good.

It actually boils down to simple economics. For the price of a six-pack, you can kick in a few bucks to help defend your Second Amendment rights. Instead of paying for some designer coffee one or two mornings each month, stick that money away and drop it in your bucket of bucks. What’s that box of cartridges cost? Skip plinking once a month and stick that money in a bag, sock or small box in the corner of your gun safe.

Those who don’t belong to an organized gun club, or attend a monthly gun show, can turn the bucket into your personal piggy bank. You might be surprised how quickly these little donations accumulate. Throw in loose change every day. Pennies, nickels, and dimes suddenly become dollars. If you receive change for any purchase, a quart of milk or a gallon of motor oil, empty your pockets soon as you get home and put the money in your personal bucket.

For example, I habitually save quarters. Get some paper roll tubes from the local bank or credit union. It doesn’t take much time to discover you’ve saved up $10 worth of quarters. After a couple of months, you might have $20 or $30 worth; maybe more if they’re dropped in a jar on a shelf. Multiply that by the amount of money one might collect from your pals at the gun club who are coached to do likewise, and pretty soon it’s a tidy sum. It may not seem important, but it can become part of a larger amount subsequently donated to your favorite group engaging in legal actions.

There are several worthy groups, including the NRA, Second Amendment Foundation, Gun Owners of America, Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, Firearms Policy Coalition and so forth. State-level groups include the Oregon Firearms Federation, Florida Carry, Massachusetts Gun Owners Action League, California Rifle & Pistol Association, Illinois State Rifle Association and so forth. All of these groups are currently involved in at least one court action, and they would be grateful for any help they can get.

Way back in my youth, a local city councilman said something that has stuck with me through the decades: “The thing a conservative is most conservative about is a dollar bill.”

The other side knows this. With funding from millionaires, billionaires and other wealthy elitists, the gun prohibition movement is rather well-financed. They can easily outspend you if your side doesn’t have money set aside.

Many such organizations actually learned from groups like the NRA, the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, Mule Deer Foundation, Safari Club International, Ducks Unlimited and others who hold annual fund-raising dinners and auctions. However, instead of buying wildlife habitat or doing other beneficial projects, the gun control crowd uses its money to pay lobbyists, lease buses for group trips to the state capital and even advertising. Their recreation is making you miserable.

Using The PRINCIPLE

 

If they can do it, so can you, and you have the better motive. They’re trying to destroy the Bill of Rights, while you’re working to protect it.

Why is this so important now? In case you hadn’t noticed, the gun prohibition lobby and their allies in state legislatures and Congress are engaged in a war of attrition. They pass legislation they know won’t pass a legal challenge, but they also know fighting it will cost the Second Amendment community small fortunes in legal fees.

This was the underlying strategy when cities began suing gun companies more than two decades ago. It’s still the strategy — though they will never admit it — to pass laws in various states defying the principles set down by the U.S. Supreme Court in the 2022 Bruen ruling. It costs money to fight these battles, especially when lower court judges do their best to find gray areas to things that seem black and white to gun owners.

We cannot often fight back as individuals, but we can pool our resources and put up a good fight with our allies — and using the “Bucket of Bucks” approach is one good way.

When I spoke a few months ago at a political gathering, I asked for a show of hands from people who might belong to a local gun club. When they did, they learned their assignment for the weekend was to go to the local hardware store and purchase a metal or plastic pail, write on it “Bucket of Bucks,” and start collecting funds. If even half of those folks followed through, it was a small victory.

I’m okay with small victories. It’s what grassroots action is all about — and it’s at the grassroots level where this fight may eventually be won.

Categories
All About Guns Manly Stuff You have to be kidding, right!?!

When men get bored

Categories
All About Guns

A Winchester Model 67 in caliber 22LR

Categories
All About Guns This great Nation & Its People

US States by Gun Ownership Rate | Comparison

Categories
All About Guns N.S.F.W.

I know that its not a Remington 700 right? N.S.F.W.

Categories
All About Guns Allies

Why Didn’t We Know How Dangerous This Would Be?

Categories
All About Guns You have to be kidding, right!?!

SIG Sues Washington Police Academy For Banning Training With Its P320 Pistol by Mark Chesnut

We reported recently how Sig Sauer’s popular P320 pistol has come under fire by some law enforcement agencies, military branches and even Gunsite Academy because of alleged safety problems. One such law enforcement group, the Washington State Criminal Justice Training Commission (WSCJTC), which operates Washington’s police training academy, banned the P320 for trainee use.

“My position has to be safety because we know so much now that if I make a different decision, I don’t feel like I’m being responsible,” Monica Alexander, WSCJTC executive director, said upon announcing the ban.

Now, SIG has filed a lawsuit, Sig Sauer Inc. v. WSCJTC, seeking to have the ban reversed and claiming that the ban is unnecessary and not well grounded in fact or law.

“Law enforcement departments throughout Washington State trust, rely on, and prefer the P320 as their service pistol of choice,” the lawsuit states. “By banning the P320 for new law enforcement recruits, the WSCJTC is putting these men and women at a disadvantage when they enter the field and will be assigned the P320.

The action also imposes negative financial impacts on all those law enforcement agencies that utilize the P320 and Sig Sauer. It further inappropriately and unjustifiably inflicts reputational and economic harms on Sig Sauer.”

The plaintiff further argues the lawsuit that the organization’s P320 ban runs afoul of state law and the state’s statute outlining the right to keep and bear arms.

“The executive director’s unilateral decision is inconsistent with the state’s preemption in the field of firearms regulations under Chapter 9.41 RCW and does not fall withing any statutory exception,” the complaint argues. “Chapter 9.41 RCW fully occupies and preempts the entire field of firearms regulation within the boundaries of the state, including the registration, licensing, possession, purchase, sale, acquisition, transfer, discharge and transportation of firearms, or any other elements relating to firearms parts thereof.

“Moreover, the action implicates constitutional rights, and at a minimum should be subject of formal rulemaking. The Action has the effect of regulating a field contained in Article 1, Section 24 (Right to Bear Arms)of the Washington Constitution.”

Of course, Sig Sauer is facing a number of lawsuits of its own. One was filed by Houston police officer Rick Fernandez, who claims he was shot in the leg by his holstered P320.

“The bullet from the subject handgun shot through Officer Fernandez’s right calf and lodged into his ankle,” the lawsuit stated. “But the subject handgun, at all times, remained holstered. He never pulled the trigger or otherwise handled the gun.”

Another ongoing lawsuit by a Kentucky man, who claims his holstered P320 fired on its own, is pending before the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals. In January, that court ruled that a lower court erred in dismissing Timothy Davis’s product liability claims against Sig Sauer. The court found that the district court wrongly barred Davis from using expert witnesses to support his claim that the P320 handgun was defectively designed due to its lack of external safety mechanisms.

 

Categories
All About Guns

A CHRISTOPH KUCHENREITER MARKED PERCUSSION PISTOL IN APPROXIMATELY .50 CALIBER

Categories
All About Guns

Ruger lcp .380acp review

Categories
All About Guns The Green Machine This great Nation & Its People War

Korean War – Battle of Inchon | 1950 | Fight for Seoul (our last great victory & My dads War)