Categories
All About Guns Ammo

‘WHAT’S YOUR FAVORITE CARTRIDGE?’ WATCH OUT WHEN YOU ASK SUCH A LOADED QUESTION WRITTEN BY DAVE ANDERSON

Dave’s nephew Mike Decker asked for advice on buying his first big game rifle and Dave said get a .243. A couple of weeks later Mike showed up with a Winchester 70 in .300 Win. Mag.

Friends and relatives sometimes ask for advice on cartridge choice for big game hunting and they seem surprised I don’t have any particular favorites. I tell them the most important things are: (1) shot placement and (2) bullet action. The ability to place shots accurately on demand is important, so factors influencing shooting ability such as rifle fit, trigger quality and sighting equipment matter. Oh, and practice. The shape of the cartridge case and its head stamp matter very little.

I’ve shot big game with at least 40 different cartridges, some only one or two head, others in three figures. Some get used more than others mainly because I like certain rifles, not because of the cartridge. Still, a young fellow recently came up with convincing arguments why I should give some specific recommendations.

A selection of light-recoiling rifles that are actually fun to shoot. From left,
Ruger Hawkeye .223, Remington 700 .243, Weatherby Vanguard .240 Why.,
Kimber Montana .223, Sako Finnlight .243, Savage lightweight .260 Rem.

Questions

 

The young fellow is a doctor, a podiatrist to be specific, who has been attending to my feet. Just chatting along — I thought — he mentioned watching a war movie marathon over the weekend. He noticed when the bad guys wanted to torture information out of the good guys, they would go for the toes. “Toes can be really painful,” he said, taking some kind of medieval torture device from a drawer. He poised the device over my already painful toe. “By the way, what is your favorite big game cartridge?”

“It doesn’t matter much,” I started to say, when he squeezed the handle of the torture device and two small razor-sharp blades started chomping as the device got closer to my toe.

“The .270 Winchester and .300 Win. Mag.! Love them both equally! Spare my toes and I’ll give you one. I’ll give you BOTH!”

“No need,” he said mildly. “I already have a .300 Win. Mag. Besides, doctors aren’t allowed to take gifts from patients. Wouldn’t be ethical.”

“But threatening my toes with torture is ethical?” is what I said, but not out loud.

“So why do you like those two cartridges?” I didn’t want to answer but the whirling razor choppers were now within inches of my painful big toe. “I got the .270 because Jack O’Connor and John Jobson recommended it and I found a Winchester 70 on sale. I shot deer and antelope with it, they all died quickly and as far as I know are still dead.”

“What about the .300? Another good deal?”

“Actually it was, another Winchester 70, later my real favorite, a Ruger 77 Sporter. A bit heavy with its laminated stock but it has about the most recoil I can tolerate without thinking much about it. By that I mean I can hold and shoot this .300 the same as a .223 or .243. If recoil gets heavier, I have to start taking it into account, for example, making sure there is plenty of eye relief with a scope, holding firmly with the left hand to help take up recoil, having a recoil pad, keeping the stock firm against the shoulder.…”

I continued “Another nice thing about the .300 Win. Mag., — the .30-cal. bullet weighs about 30 grains more, while .270 bullets having similar sectional densities and with the same bullet form, similar ballistic coefficients, similar velocities and therefore similar trajectories.”

Vintage pre-’64 Winchester 70 Featherweight .308, vintage Kahles 4x scope,
vintage Ruana knife. They worked 60 years ago and work just as well today.

Dave’s three-generation Biesen rifle, built by Al and Roger Biesen and
engraved by Roger’s daughter Paula. It’s a pre-’64 Winchester 70 in .270 Win.
— a classic cartridge in a classic rifle.

More choices

The doctor put the toe chomper away and got out an even more terrifying tool, this one with a motor. “Bet you think you’re mighty smart tossing around terms like sectional density and ballistic coefficient. Do you know what dendritic synovitis is? How about pemphigus? Acrokeratosis paraneoplastica? See, you’re not so smart. Are you saying I should get a .270 to go with my .300?”

“No! You should get a .22LR, a .223 and a .375, either H&H or Ruger, to go with your .300. Now I’ve told you the truth, you tell me the truth. Do you really enjoy shooting the .300 Magnum?”

“Of course I do! I love it. Recoil doesn’t bother me at all.”

I’d been watching my chance. Now I grabbed the motor-driven toe torture tool from his hands. One pull on the starter cord and the two-stroke engine roared to life. “I guess the foot’s on the other shoe now!” I said, holding the whirling blade near his toes. I’ll teach him to wear sandals to work. “Speak the truth, do you enjoy shooting the .300 Magnum?”

“No! It’s too loud. It’s too expensive. It kicks too hard. I got a scope cut. Recoil does bother me. After five shots I flinch like a patient with an ingrown toenail. I need help!”

“Very good. On Saturday we’ll go to the gun store and find a rifle that fits you in any one of 30 or 40 cartridges you will actually enjoy shooting.” I turned off the motor of the fearsome tool but didn’t put it down. “I acknowledge you are the medical expert, so carry on. We’re not going to hurt one another, are we?”

Categories
All About Guns

The Model 1884 Trapdoor Springfield Saddle Ring Carbine | Gun History | MidwayUSA

Categories
All About Guns

A MASTER ENGRAVED ’78 DUGUET PYTHON, A COLT PYTHON REVOLVER 6″ barrel in 357mag i.e. The definition of what a Safe Queen looks like!

Categories
All About Guns

Vektor CP-1: Recalled to the Mother Ship

Categories
All About Guns

Development of the Luger Automatic Pistol

Categories
All About Guns

15 Earliest Firearms Ever Invented

Categories
All About Guns Allies War

British Sten Submachine Gun – Shooting Review

Categories
All About Guns

EM2 Rifle: Britain vs. America Round 3 by Ashley Hlebinsky

EM2 Rifle Cover

Years ago, when I was still an assistant curator, I gave a vault tour to the Outdoor Channel’s Gun Stories production crew. When I opened one of the vault doors, they got incredibly excited to see a firearm about which I knew very little — a firearm that’s rare in the United States and one that has developed a cult following — the British EM2 Rifle.

This selective-fire bullpup rifle went head to head during the NATO Trials (1950s) with the guns that would become the U.S. M14 and the FN FAL. While I’ve discussed the unique technological developments that stemmed from this time period in previous articles, especially in terms of experiments with actual space age materials and concepts, one thing I haven’t touched on was the impact of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).

In 1949, NATO was established by the U.S., Canada, and other European countries. The goal was to create a transatlantic security alliance to protect against the Soviet Union. This agreement was intended as a reciprocal one in which economically stable countries could help reinvigorate others destroyed by World War II and in turn create a united front to protect the world from encroaching communism.

EM2 Rifle

While I won’t get into all the nitty-gritty details and arguments about the pros and cons of the agreement, I will confirm that it influenced the adoption of military technology across the allied countries. As a result, some technological inventions during this time frame were tested, but many were tested in search of standardizing rifles and cartridges.

Several of these inventions were created to meet a need for the government, such as the .280 intermediate cartridge — the caliber in most EM2 type rifles — but not widely adopted. While the EM2 type rifles have developed quite a following as an infallible firearm and caliber combo and therefore was purely eliminated due to NATO and American bias against their cartridge, it wasn’t without fault.

This article will explore a bit of the EM2 type history. However, the entire history with a detailed summation of the technology, accoutrements, trials, as well as success and failures behind these bullpups will be published in a book by Jonathan S. Ferguson, Keeper of Firearms and Artillery for the Royal Armouries in Leeds, so I won’t spoil all the fantastic details. I’m grateful though that Ferguson provided me a preview into this fascinating history — one that is full of what ifs, colloquial perception, and politics.

TRY SPELLING THAT NAME ON A STARBUCKS CUP

Kazimierz Stefan Januszewski, a Polish immigrant, was a prisoner of war in Hungary who escaped to Britain by way of Italy and France. There’s speculation on his career in Poland; he was a part of the Polish Army and some believe worked in the Radom Factory before 1939. Once in England, he played a pivotal role in the design of weaponry technology for the military.

EM2 Rifle

Januszewski became a British citizen in 1947. He was a commissioned officer in Poland during the war and retained his rank as Captain in England. In 1950, he changed his name to Stefan Kenneth Janson, which was probably a smart move because no one in the history of America’s Ellis Island was going to spell that name correctly. He worked in Britain in the Armament Design Establishment until he left for the U.S. in 1953 to work for Winchester, notably for the U.S. Government’s Project SALVO.

During his time with Winchester, where he’d finish out his career and retire in 1974, he served as the Head of Engineering of the Arms Research and Development Department and ultimately Director of Arms Product Research. He oversaw the production of many civilian arms as well, including the Winchester Models 190, 255, 1200, and 1400 firearms.

However, you didn’t come here to read about the commercial shotguns he made for Winchester. Most people are a little more interested in his work with Britain’s Infantry Personal Weapon Program — which would lead to his development of the EM2 rifle.

EM2 TYPE RIFLE PROGRAM

While bullpups had been around for a while, the EM2 was one of the first bullpup service rifles adopted by any nation, albeit temporarily. It did receive a military designation following acceptance by the Brits and was known as: Rifle, 7mm, No.9 MK.1.

EM2 type rifles weren’t widely adopted by other NATO members, and the 7.62 NATO cartridge ultimately won out with the adoption of an FN FAL variant in the UK (the L1A1 Rifle, Self Loading), and the M14 in the U.S.

The Unit sight: a 1x optic with an etched reticle. It was unusual to see an optic mounted to a standard infantry rifle until the 1980s, so, in this way, the EM2 was ahead of its time. 

Many fans of the EM2 believe purely American politics are to blame for the rejection of the rifle. While the U.S. and the adoption of the NATO cartridge did play a role, it was in large part Winston Churchill’s decision to ax it. In fact, Ferguson’s research shows that the reasons for leaving the EM2 type rifles behind in history is far more nuanced than some realize. While the firearm did well in testing, in fact better in some trials than the FAL, it had pragmatic and practical issues.

Now, I keep writing “EM2 type rifles” and that’s because it’s more of a colloquialism for a series of similar rifles used in testing. The name was used in early prototypes, so it stuck. The predecessors to the EM2 were multiple EM-1s, including the Korsac and Thorpe design. Although, Janson’s first prototype, code named MAMBA, was introduced on May 27, 1947, at the same time as Thorpe’s EM-1.

There were many similarities between these prototypes. They were bullpups, meaning the pistol grip and magazine is forward of the action, which in turn makes the firearm shorter and lighter. Several were also equipped with similar magazines and an ahead-of-its-time Unit optic sight.

Janson worked on Korsac’s EM-1 and, in 1947, under the Infantry Personal Weapon Program, led a team using Korsac’s EM-1 to base his EM2 rifle. He eventually received two patents — 2,775,166 and 2,935,915 — and chambered the firearm in .280 — England’s contender in the fight for a standardized NATO cartridge. In 1949, the EM2 was pitted against the Fabrique Nationale Herstal Carabine Universell and the Birmington Small Arm’s Company’s prototypes. They were all chambered for the .280. They were tested against the M1 Garand as a control. During this testing, the EM2 did encounter stoppages, but not as many as the BSA and M1 Garand.

EM2 Rifle bayonette

In the U.S. Trial of February 1950, the EM2 was tested against FN and the American T-25, which was chambered in .30 Lightweight rifle. The EM2 did receive criticism, including that it couldn’t be fired from the left shoulder and the trigger heated to the point of causing blistering. In the end, the EM2 and the T-25 were declared to require significant improvements. While the EM2’s story was over in America, trials continued back in England. While briefly adopted, it was quickly overturned by Churchill. In the end, the EM2 was a good rifle. It, like the other trials guns, needed modifications but had it been adopted, cost could’ve been a prohibitive factor. It’s estimated that only five EM2s could be made for the same cost as six FALs, which adds up. Additionally, the U.S. wasn’t backing down on caliber. Despite the fact that some EM2 rifles diverted from the .280 norm and were actually chambered in 7.62 NATO, ultimately good ole Churchill was just a much bigger fan of the FAL. In fact, an engraved presentation piece made for him sits in the Imperial War Museum today.

AN EM2 TYPE RIFLE IN AMERICA

As I mentioned in the introduction, the Cody Firearms Museum has one of these EM2 type rifles from the Winchester collection. This firearm is a “Rifle, 30 inch, X2E1’ chambered in 7.62x51mm.” It was a part of a series built at RSAF Enfield, probably in the latter half of 1951. It’s serial number EN109. According to Ferguson, the rifle was gifted in May of 1960. While it’s conceivable that Janson was involved in the gifting process, it cannot be confirmed.

It never ceases to amaze me that, to most of the world, Winchester is the quintessential Western brand, thanks in part to Winchester’s marketing campaign after World War I. Yet somehow no matter what I study and where I go, it seems all roads lead back to Winchester — even something as British as a bullpup.

[Editor’s Note: Photography Courtesy of the Cody Firearms Museum. This Article First Appeared in RECOIL #56.]


EM2 Rifle
Did you know that the British don’t actually use the term bullpup? They used the term buttless rifle. Above you can see a bayonet mounted to this EM2, however, it also accepted a grenade launcher as an attachment. 

EM2 TYPE RIFLE (X2E1)

Make: Royal Small Arms Factory
Barrel length: 26 inches
Overall length: 35 inches
Weight: 7.7 pounds
Caliber: 7.62x51mm
Action: Gas-operated; Flapper Locked
Mag capacity: 20 rounds
Rate of Fire: 450-600 rounds/min

Categories
All About Guns

STAR becheverria eibare spana S.A CAL.22 LR Restoration

Categories
A Victory! All About Guns Well I thought it was funny!

A very Zombie Holiday!