Category: All About Guns
Benelli M4
The HK 421
Remington 870 Suppressed!
I had absolutely no shame at all & clipped it from “The American Rifleman”

How do I even begin this article? On the one hand, a straight-up history of various folding firearms would be a place to start, given that “FDP” stands for Folding Defensive Platform.
We could start with some of the flintlock and percussion-cap pistols of the 18th and 19th centuries that had folding triggers. There’s the Burgess folding shotgun of the late 1800s (a design we’re seeing coming back around in the Pak 12 introduced at SHOT Show 2026). There’s also the Russian PP-90 or the Ares FMG, and even more recently, the KelTec SUB2000, folding Glock G19 and Smith & Wesson FPC. Guns that fold are really not all that novel or new.
What about discreet firearms? There’s the Heckler & Koch MP5K Operational Briefcase or the Military Armament Corporation MAC 10 and 11 briefcase designs. The Lifecard looks like an oversize credit card until it is folded out to a single-shot pistol.
We could even toss the belt-buckle-riding North American Arms mini-revolver in the mix if we use the “hiding in plain sight” method of (non)concealment. These options are fewer and farther between than straight-up folding guns simply because of Any Other Weapon (AOW) considerations; basically, if a firearm doesn’t look like a firearm when it is capable of firing, it is considered an AOW and therefore falls under NFA regulations.
Even some wallet-style pocket holsters can run afoul of this burdensome regulation if they allow the holstered gun to fire when in the holster itself (in addition to not being exactly safe for carry).
It’s the rare confluence of folding design and discreet nature that make the FDP so interesting. Looking at the folded firearm, it looks like—well, it looks like a tool kit you’d see on “Star Trek” or something. It doesn’t look like a firearm, which was the original intention behind the predecessor to the FDP, the FMG-9.
Drake Clark, Magpul’s sales and business development manager, walked the floor of SHOT Show with a folded FMG-9 stuck in his back pocket (with the carry handle removed), taking time to show it to folks he knew who would be interested (which should be everyone, because it’s just that darn cool).
Per Clark, as a matter of fact, “Really what we wanted was the Russian folding gun, the PP-90, but that wasn’t happening. You can’t easily get your hands on an Ares folding gun like in Robocop [2] either. If we can’t get the cool thing we want, we build it. We like cool s**t and we like tinkering, key ingredients of the Magpul recipe.”
The funny part, though, is that the FMG-9 wasn’t even Magpul’s first foray into firearm prototyping. Two years before the FMG-9 caused a stir at SHOT Show, Magpul had unveiled the PDR, a futuristic bullpup that looked like the love child of a PS90 and an M4. Around the same time as the FMG-9, the Masada—the rifle that would turn into the Bushmaster/Remington ACR— was also revealed, aiming at the piston-driven market dominated by FN’s SCAR and LWRCI’s M6. Magpul reiterated with the FMG-9 that, while not a firearm company, it could certainly produce cool prototypes.
As mentioned, the FDP started life as the FMG-9, introduced at SHOT Show 2008—yes, that’s right, if it were a human, it would be old enough to vote now. In 2021, the project transmogrified into the FDP, which is finally hitting store shelves some 18 years after the first prototype wowed us. It’s been a long road, but the Magpul (and Zev) folding pistol-caliber carbine has finally moved past the cryptid-like status of other firearms like the revitalized Bren Ten or the resurrected AutoMag.
But, it hasn’t really been in production purgatory for 18 years, mind you. When the FMG-9 was displayed at SHOT, it was fully intended to be a “look what we can do” sort of thing, not a “we are going to have this for sale.”
After returning from a vacation abroad in late 2007, Mike Mayberry (the designer behind the PMag) took inspiration from the Ares FMG, sat down at his design table and whipped up what would become the FMG-9. Some late-night hustling with an early 3-D printer, and prototypes were ready for SHOT Show in January 2008.
Having the FMG-9’s likeness displayed in an extremely popular video game series in 2011 only intensified the mystique of Magpul’s folding carbine—but remember, it was never intended to go into production.
Think of it like the fantastic concept cars that GM and Ford roll out to drum up interest, but are never going to make, like the Cadillac Sixteen revealed in the early 2000s with four-wheel steering and a 13.6 liter, V16 engine. The Sixteen was never produced, but the four-wheel steering made it into production vehicles.
What jump-started the project and turned the corner into reality was a partnership with Zev Technologies in the late 20-teens. Zev’s OZ9 pistol and its chassis concept became the basis for the FDP, the successor to the FMG. Magpul would make the polymer bits, the stock, mags and carry handle/sight array; Zev would make the barrel, slide and fire-control assembly. In 2021, the FMG-9 morphed into the semi-automatic FDP, and the folding firearm project was officially underway.
Yes, it took a little bit of time for the concept to become a reality. Zev Technologies president Taylor Goode explained, “Inno-vation doesn’t happen overnight. The FDP is literally a gun that folds.
Not a chassis—a true folding gun. Getting it from concept to production took a lot of engineering, both on the “go-bang” internals and the folding shell from our friends at Magpul. We know folks waited a long time to see this one come to life, but we set out to create an entirely new platform that exceeds expectations, not a novelty. That requires a lot of due diligence. The result has been worth the wait.”
So, with all this information about the work that went into the design and eventual production of the FDP, what does it boil down to? It might be tempting to dismiss the FDP as a gimmick; after all, the party trick of the unfolding is pretty showy and attention-getting.
To be fair, that’s not a bad thing; as Tamara Keel has made the case—repeatedly—in her “From the Counter” column in this very publication, that shooting is and should be fun. Bring the FDP to the range, and I guarantee you will raise the interest of your fellow shooters. It is most decidedly different; no question about that.
More importantly, it is not a one-trick pony. It offers a lot more than just the novelty of “hey, this toolkit-looking thing turns into a pistol-caliber carbine”—it’s actually a quality, capable firearm as well. Granted, when you see the names “Zev Technologies” and “Magpul” as the two companies behind the FDP, it’s tipping your hand as to how the gun can be expected to work. Neither company is any slouch in the excellence department; combined, the result should be spectacular.
And the FDP really is great. While recording some video for social media, we ran a number of magazines through the FDP quickly (slow-fire, when recorded in slow-motion, is about as much fun to watch as paint drying). Not only were there no malfunctions, but the accuracy (even with the … ahem … rudimentary sights) was top-notch. At 25 yards, I think maybe a half-dozen rounds left the C-zone of a standard IPSC target—and I was not taking my time with a solid shooting stance and focusing on the basics.
The folding component is definitely more than just an attention-getting device, too. The careful, clever engineering that goes into the FDP allows it to look rather innocuous—if you were to transport it in a messenger bag, should someone peek inside, they’d see a nondescript black case. It’s not like a large-format pistol that will immediately alert others to the presence of a firearm. Also, it takes standard Glock magazines, so if you carry a Glock-based 9 mm handgun, you’ve got the added convenience of double-dipping in your feeding devices.
There are some drawbacks, to be sure. If you, like me, prefer red-dot sights on your defensive carbine, while it’s certainly easy enough to add one to the FDP, you lose the element of surprise. It will still fold, of course; however, when it is in the folded configuration, the red-dot sight will be clearly visible, thereby diminishing the “hiding in plain sight” aspect of the folded FDP. It’s also an SBR, which in and of itself isn’t a huge issue with the tax reduced to zero thanks to the efforts of your NRA.
However, there are certain rules currently in place with SBRs that make ownership less convenient than for suppressors—namely the requirement to alert ATF if you’re taking it to a different state. Efforts are underway to change this, but at present, it remains a consideration.
If you want to accessorize the FDP, it’s not as easy as a traditional carbine. There aren’t any M-Lok slots to add lights or lasers. There’s no section for accessories, nor any ARCA rail or sling swivel studs for a bipod mount. But again, that’s not why you’re buying the FDP. It’s the “foldy-boi” aspect, not the ability to trick it out, that gives the FDP its appeal.
Let’s talk about the folding part. It’s both ingenious and simple. To unfold the FDP, simply grasp the carry handle with the fold facing the ground. Depress the charging handle slightly, and the gun unfolds into its usable form.
Make sure that both the pistol grip and the cover plate at the top of the buttstock are locked into position, then insert a loaded magazine and use the charging handle to load. To fold it up, make sure it’s unloaded (check twice, just to be safe) and close the slide. Push the lever on top of the stock cover plate as well as the lever on the grip to unlatch both, and then the FDP can be closed.
Operationally, it’s basically an overgrown handgun. The magazine inserts in the grip, the barrel tilts up during firing (which makes it look odd when shooting with a suppressor attached, but I digress) and the controls are where you would expect them to be on pretty much any polymer-frame, striker-fired handgun.
The magazine catch is reversible, and the charging handle (which, of course, also folds) is mirrored on the right and left sides; the safety lever is right-hand only, as is the slide-release lever. There’s a vestigial loaded-chamber indicator built into the extractor that is flush with the slide when a round is inserted for additional peace of mind, too.
Since it uses a short-recoil-operated, locked-breech system rather than simple blowback, recoil is quite light, even for an already-gentle 9 mm SBR. The sights are functional and adjustable, and accuracy is about what you’d expect from such platforms.
You’re not going to win bullseye competitions with the FDP, but it’s certainly accurate enough for home- and self-defense scenarios, even those at more extended distances. At close ranges, the type you’d see for typical self-defense engagements, it’s easy to put rounds right where you want them pretty much as quickly as you can pull the trigger.

More critical is reliability—I wanted to give the FDP a workout, so more than 500 rounds were fired (It’s also crazy fun on the range, so I might have run a few more magazines than usual).
One single stovepipe was experienced, toward the end of testing when the FDP had gotten both rather hot and pretty dirty. I’m not terribly concerned, as it happened with a magazine of questionable vintage (a “pre-ban” Glock 33-round magazine I’ve owned for almost 30 years). One lone failure out of 500 rounds isn’t a dealbreaker in my opinion, especially if you clean and lubricate properly.
It’s hard not to love the FDP. Combining “cool factor” with a gun that actually functions well and can be used for defensive purposes is a fait accompli; there’s definitely cachet to having an eye-catching firearm that also serves a useful purpose.
Even if the FDP wasn’t great for self-defense—and it is great for self-defense—it would still be an important addition to the firearm market; the engineering that goes into the folding characteristics will almost certainly be carried over into future projects.
Useful, cool and reliable? That’s a trifecta of awesome in my book. If you want it because it’s neat, it certainly is. But, if you want it because it’s neat and you can actually use it, that’s its true beauty, because it simply works and works well.

What a tough choice to make !!

Smith & Wesson is reaching deep into its history books with two new additions to its Classics line: the Model 1917 Classic and Model 22 Classic.
Both are big, blued N-frame revolvers with walnut grips, six-round cylinders and military-style lanyard rings. They look properly old school, but Smith & Wesson builds them with modern materials and manufacturing.
The Model 1917 is the more historically faithful of the pair. The original revolver was developed during World War I when the U.S. military needed more .45-caliber handguns than manufacturers could supply with the M1911 alone. Smith & Wesson adapted its large-frame revolver to fire the rimless .45 ACP cartridge using half-moon clips.
The new Model 1917 carries that look forward with a 5.5-inch barrel, half-moon front sight and oversized ejector rod knob. Its six-round cylinder accepts .45 ACP ammunition using either half-moon or full-moon clips. Smith & Wesson says the revolver ships with five moon clips.
Basically, it is a modern-production version of a classic military wheelgun, complete with the long barrel, simple sights and lanyard loop that give the Model 1917 its unmistakable profile.
The new Model 22 Classic takes the same basic idea in a slightly handier direction. It uses a shorter 4-inch barrel and a serrated ramp front sight, which should make it quicker to handle and easier to pick up on the range.
The Model 22 also brings some useful caliber flexibility. Shooters can load .45 Auto using moon clips or place .45 Colt cartridges directly into the six-round cylinder. That makes it the more versatile option for anyone who wants the classic N-frame experience without being tied to a single cartridge.
Both revolvers feature blued carbon-steel construction, traditional-style walnut grips and the kind of hefty N-frame build that earned these guns their reputations in the first place. These are not lightweight carry revolvers. They are unapologetically large, steel-framed classics built for shooters who appreciate history, big-bore cartridges and a satisfying double-action trigger pull.
The Model 1917 Classic and Model 22 Classic each carry an MSRP of $1,299.

When it comes to finding a good concealed carry holster, it pays to hunt hard and be skeptical.
I would imagine when most millionaires purchase a holster, they just buy the best one they can find, even if they’re just buying it for their bodyguard. Unless you’re part of that 7.6 percent millionaire segment of the U.S. population, I’m guessing much of your life is governed by dollars and sense. Meaning, you apply all the sense you have, to most every dollar you spend, because your kids, gas and groceries come first. Given that lifestyle, how should you select a holster you’re going to use to carry a gun you’ll trust your life with every day?
There are a lot of holster makers out there and most offer various tiers of quality. They’ll offer entry-level holsters for new shooters and the financially challenged, and they’ll offer higher-quality rigs for the more discriminating buyer. We can’t cover them all here, but we can look at two nearly identical holsters from Galco that perfectly represent different price points and quality. Maybe that will help you see what you might give up if you buy the less expensive version, and what you might gain by spending more money.
According to Mike Barham at Galco Gunleather, they introduced the original Stow-N-Go IWB holster over 20 years ago. It was the first holster in their Concealed Carry Lite line, which is a budget-friendly series of concealed carry holsters that provide “everything you need and nothing you don’t.” Mike said the Stow-N-Go was an immediate hit and has been a best-seller.

The Stow-N-Go retails for about $69, and although Galco considers it budget friendly, it’s not cheaply constructed. It’s made of a single piece of center-cut steer hide that’s rough on both sides, double stitched along the rear edge and has a folded and stitched mouth to help keep it open for one-hand holstering. It also has a stitched-on panel for the polymer belt clip mount that’s sized to work with belts up to 1¾ inches.
Galco provided one for a Stow-N-Go for review, and I tried it with a steel-framed Colt Commander weighing about 40 ounces, loaded. Turned upside down, the holster would not retain the pistol, but this is an IWB holster and if worn as intended with the belt tight enough to secure it, the gun is not going to fall out. Fit—though not molded—was good and the rough leather sort of helped hold everything including my shirttail in place. However, that same rough leather was a bit grabby when inserting the holster inside the waistband. Though the holster’s mouth remains mostly open when the holster is worn, sometimes I had to wiggle the pistol’s muzzle a bit for insertion.

The other holster Galco provided is an upgraded Stow-N-Go from their Masterbilt line, and it’s called the Stow-N-Go Elite. Masterbilt holsters are crafted in small batches by Galco’s most experienced craftsmen. Galco decided to offer the Stow-N-Go Elite based on the decades-long success and popularity of their Stow-N-Go. The Elite version is crafted from lined premium steerhide, and it’s molded by the most experienced hands on Galco’s production team. It uses the same convenient and secure belt clip, it’s rigid enough to hold its shape for one-hand holstering, and even though it’s an IWB holster, no one will ever see how great it looks.

The old saying, “it fits like a glove,” is better used to describe the basic Stow-N-Go, because in that holster, the pistol—like your hand in a glove—will have some space around it. That’s not the case with the Stow-N-Go Elite, it’s perfectly molded to fit your pistol, and it will retain it in the upside-down position. However, drawing from the holster is butter smooth.

Galco Stow-N-Go Elite IWB Holster SIG-SAUER P365 X-MACRO
From the standpoint of quality materials, fit and finish, the Elite version of the Stow-N-Go is undeniably the better option. However, it’s going to rob your wallet of about 100 extra Washingtons. But there’s more to the Stow-N-Go Elite than just good looks. Its smooth finish makes it a bit easier to put on, it will hold its shape almost indefinitely and last longer, and the finely finished leather prevents perspiration absorbance. My only complaint was with the same slick finish that makes putting it on so easy sometimes allowed my tucked shirt to crawl up out of my pants around the holster if I did a lot of sitting and standing.

From a carry comfort standpoint, I could hardly tell any difference between the two holsters that are separated in cost by a hundred bucks. I also compared them on the range by drawing and firing 10 shots from each, at 10 yards, on a miniature silhouette target. The average time with the Stow-N-Go was 1.278 seconds, and with the Elite my average was 1.137 seconds. The Elite was faster by 0.141 second or 11 percent. That’s not an earth-shattering difference but it’s something.

I’d not hesitate to carry, trust—or recommend—the base model Stow-N-Go, though I prefer the Elite version because it feels more rigid/sturdier in my pants, will last longer and comes with more pride of ownership for whatever that’s worth. If I could swing the extra cash—though I might have to eat bologna sandwiches for a few months—the Elite version would be my pick. However, sometimes trusting the consumer provides a thing called a clue. Barham said the last time he checked, Galco had sold more than a half-million Stow-N-Go holsters, and I can see the appeal. That affordable holster works very well. Currently, Galco offers the basic Stow-N-Go for 204 different handguns, and the Stow-N-Go Elite is available for 62.
Some Hillbilly Holster Wisdom

Today, you can buy any holster you want online, and it’s at your doorstep in a day or two. But, if you wear it for a week and don’t like it, you’re stuck with it, and it goes in that box of holsters living in the dark recesses of your closet. Take it from a hillbilly who has carried a handgun on an everyday basis for most his life—don’t buy a holster you have not tried, or as a minimum, discussed with someone who has. Your holster is just as important as your underwear and jeans and should fit your gun and you just as well.